Michele Bachmann calls immigrant children ‘invaders’ and compares them to rapists

a reply to: blupblup

Well, some people DO give a crap.

Just like they pull the Race card everytime someone has an objection to some policy, I can see it now! Everytime someone objects to the illegal entry of people ---children, women, teenagers, gang members, etc. --- they are going to pull the "heartless" card. Sheesh!

a reply to: macman

Do you honestly believe that deporting 57 thousand children is going to help?

I understand the adults, that's fine, I'm in total agreement with you. We cannot punish these kids for the mistakes of their parents, that's not right.

We shouldn't be doing that either.

By comparison would it not cost much less to help these children attain proper housing with adoptive families or relatives?

I'm not disagreeing that the adults have all the options in the world to back to once deported when they are found to be in the US illegally.

NO problems there.

But the children, I mean, come one, isn't there some middle ground?

~Tenth

originally posted by: macman
The UN has no jurisdiction over the US.

The UN can kiss my white rebel dick.

Awesome... well done.
You're a kind soul really aren't ya? Just a big ball of hugs and rainbows!


Well the UN hopefully does give these kids status and then they WILL be coming in.

Suck it!

a reply to: tothetenthpower

If they are coming because of the drug war, why the exponential growth in numbers since President Obama's dream Act?

Why the difference from just last year to this year?

What happened in those countries that caused the mass exodus?

How can someone that is fleeing such horror, bypass countries to claim refugee status in America? Should they not claim that status in the first country outside their own? Or is it because they are fleeing poverty rather than a "prolonged drug war"?

Do we as a nation really need to import poverty? Do we not have enough of that here without adding more to the lines?

originally posted by: blupblup

originally posted by: macman
The UN has no jurisdiction over the US.

The UN can kiss my white rebel dick.

Awesome... well done.
You're a kind soul really aren't ya? Just a big ball of hugs and rainbows!


Well the UN hopefully does give these kids status and then they WILL be coming in.

Suck it!

No they won`t if I and millions of other Americans have a say(and we will).There will be no UN interference and the Gov that backs that interference will be gone once and for all.

originally posted by: 200Plus
a reply to: tothetenthpower

If they are coming because of the drug war, why the exponential growth in numbers since President Obama's dream Act?

Why the difference from just last year to this year?

What happened in those countries that caused the mass exodus?

How can someone that is fleeing such horror, bypass countries to claim refugee status in America? Should they not claim that status in the first country outside their own? Or is it because they are fleeing poverty rather than a "prolonged drug war"?

Do we as a nation really need to import poverty? Do we not have enough of that here without adding more to the lines?

It's the only way to fully ensure the nation and the republic are broken. From another perspective, Obama is fighting for his life. It's my prediction that he'll be impeached and possibly sent to prison, if the Republicans win both houses. The illegals are here to vote in an attempt to hold democrat seats.

originally posted by: Sunwolf

No they won`t if I and millions of other Americans have a say(and we will).There will be no UN interference and the Gov that backs that interference will be gone once and for all.

But you don't have a say? You elect leaders to have a say for you.
You're also a UN member state... anyway whatever.

You all think whatever you want.

Good luck.

a reply to: 200Plus

Immigration to the US from the southern border has been in decline since 2010. Some are reporting a Net 0 increase and that it may even be declining.

So I'm not sure we know there's been an 'exodus' so much as ICE and other agencies just simply haven't been dealing with this issue appropriately for years. Patch work legislation and talking point media obviously hasn't helped either.

How can someone that is fleeing such horror, bypass countries to claim refugee status in America? Should they not claim that status in the first country outside their own? Or is it because they are fleeing poverty rather than a "prolonged drug war"?

I don't have the answers to those specific questions. All I know is that America, land of free and equal opportunity, something you have marketed for decades, is a desirable place to go.

I said in part caused by, not entirely.

~Tenth

originally posted by: tothetenthpower


Do you honestly believe that deporting 57 thousand children is going to help?

Got to start somewhere. And yes, as if it weren't for them, there would not be a need to convert a resort for $50m to house said criminal juveniles.

originally posted by: tothetenthpower
I understand the adults, that's fine, I'm in total agreement with you. We cannot punish these kids for the mistakes of their parents, that's not right.

So, it is punishment to return them to their parents?

So, punish the US Tax Payer with added debt, importation of illnesses that are coming with them, and now basically the US Govt playing mommy & Daddy for them.

originally posted by: tothetenthpower

By comparison would it not cost much less to help these children attain proper housing with adoptive families or relatives?

That really is the lamest argument that continues to be brought up.
They don't belong here. They are not the responsibility of the US.

originally posted by: tothetenthpower
I'm not disagreeing that the adults have all the options in the world to back to once deported when they are found to be in the US illegally.

I guess that the juvenile criminals couldn't just turn around and go home, maybe once they were a couple blocks into this journey?
They were not forced to come here and break laws.

originally posted by: tothetenthpower
NO problems there.

But the children, I mean, come one, isn't there some middle ground?

~Tenth

No. No there is no middle ground.

They broke laws coming here. They don't belong here. They are not the responsibility of the US Tax payer. Their parents are disgusting for sending their kids away in this manner.

a reply to: Bilk22

The illegals are here to vote in an attempt to hold democrat seats.

Do you really think that Obama is in 'cahoots' with illegal immigrants to get them to come to the US and vote for democrats?

Really?

~Tenth

originally posted by: blupblup

originally posted by: Sunwolf

No they won`t if I and millions of other Americans have a say(and we will).There will be no UN interference and the Gov that backs that interference will be gone once and for all.

But you don't have a say? You elect leaders to have a say for you.
You're also a UN member state... anyway whatever.

You all think whatever you want.



Yep,I sure will and those elected leaders that buy into this illegal amnesty baloney will be gone.
Good luck.

originally posted by: blupblup

Awesome... well done.

Well...thank you. **Takes a Bow**

originally posted by: blupblup
You're a kind soul really aren't ya? Just a big ball of hugs and rainbows!

Never said I was.
I also don't force MY compassion on other countries or other people.

originally posted by: blupblup
Well the UN hopefully does give these kids status and then they WILL be coming in.

Suck it!

Again, even if the UN does, it has no authority over the US.

Double suck it.

a reply to: macman

That's just it, they didn't send them away. They escorted them here. If any party should be ashamed of using children, it's the democrats. They put these kids thru hell getting them here and now they're in a worse hell in many cases. This conspiracy will be exposed and those responsible will face jail time.

a reply to: blupblup

Let's look at the long road of the UN deciding America's fate under an Obama created crisis.

The Dems would lose EVERY election they ran in. Republicans would have a field day with "the Democrats surrendered America". With a Republican House, Senate, and President (combined with Obama's precedent of disregarding the Constitution), how long would Social Safety programs survive? What would the NEW immigration reform look like? What would America's foreign policy look like? How would the MIC benefit? Everything done in the last six years would be wiped away. Perhaps your ideas are what's best for America in the long run after all...............

We are Americans, We can be pushed and pushed and pushed. However, once we have had enough it gets ugly fast. This has the potential to get uglier than anything in recent history.

a reply to: macman

So, punish the US Tax Payer with added debt, importation of illnesses that are coming with them, and now basically the US Govt playing mommy & Daddy for them.

Immigrant children are actually more likely to be properly vaccinated and healthy.

The whole illness and disease thing is a myth.

No. No there is no middle ground.

No compromise then?

Alright I get it.

~Tenth

originally posted by: tothetenthpower

Immigrant children are actually more likely to be properly vaccinated and healthy.

The whole illness and disease thing is a myth.

So, all the reports of Scabies, parasitic pneumonia, TB and such are all fake.
All the reports of gag orders to medical personal are fake.

originally posted by: tothetenthpower

No compromise then?

Alright I get it.

~Tenth

Compromise on current laws and those that break the laws??

Why?

There is no middle ground whoever pushes this illegal alien amnesty will be gone.

originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: Bilk22

The illegals are here to vote in an attempt to hold democrat seats.

Do you really think that Obama is in 'cahoots' with illegal immigrants to get them to come to the US and vote for democrats?

Really?

~Tenth

Yes. This has been orchestrated and it's not even hidden from the public. Our dear leader met with the president of Mexico to fast track their delivery from Central America to our border. You want to dispute that?

a reply to: tothetenthpower

I cannot buy the "immigrants are more immunized than Americans" thing. Again it's a behind closed doors talking point. If that was the case why all the forced secrecy at the detention facilities? Why not allow the media in? Why not allow Congressman in when the facility is in their district? Why confiscate phones of workers? What are they hiding from the public?

There have been many compromises in the past. Each and every one of them was a trade. Amnesty for a secure border. Amnesty is given and the border is forgotten. How many times should the American people buy into the lie of "just one more time"?

originally posted by: 200Plus
a reply to: tothetenthpower

I cannot buy the "immigrants are more immunized than Americans" thing. Again it's a behind closed doors talking point. If that was the case why all the forced secrecy at the detention facilities? Why not allow the media in? Why not allow Congressman in when the facility is in their district? Why confiscate phones of workers? What are they hiding from the public?

There have been many compromises in the past. Each and every one of them was a trade. Amnesty for a secure border. Amnesty is given and the border is forgotten. How many times should the American people buy into the lie of "just one more time"?

The reason is they'll interview the illegals and discover they were coached and their passage here was paid for by the US taxpayer. They need to get them indoctrinated and dispersed into the population where they'll be harder to track down.