It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"High performance infrared cameras are crucial for space exploration missions," said Manijeh Razeghi, the Walter P. Murphy Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. "By studying the infrared waves emitted by cool stars and planets, scientists are beginning to unlock the mysteries of these cooler objects."
originally posted by: stormbringer1701
www.sciencedaily.com...
"High performance infrared cameras are crucial for space exploration missions," said Manijeh Razeghi, the Walter P. Murphy Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science in the McCormick School of Engineering and Applied Science. "By studying the infrared waves emitted by cool stars and planets, scientists are beginning to unlock the mysteries of these cooler objects."
i have read articles that say it is quite common for gas giant migration in the early life of star systems to launch terrestrial planets out into the void between stars. the articles i saw suggested billions of frozen worlds are roaming between stars but because of their size, distance from light and heat sources and non self emitter nature they are close to impossible to see with current instruments. so there could be quite a few of these just outside the solar system certainly in the Oort cloud. so potentially at a distance of far less than a light year away. some of these may have had time to develop life before getting the boot. perhaps these are within reach of our current propulsion tech or near future tech. maybe we can find and visit some of these. maybe we could find a frozen space cootie and bring it back.
originally posted by: igor_ats
Without any stars nearby to heat them up and wandering in the void of space not tethered in orbit to any other planets or stars than they would be:
1 - very cold, as cold as you can get without any sun - inhospitable to life (like pluto but worse).
2 - atmosphere destroyed?
3 - unlikely to be some sort of wellspring of life ppl think.
originally posted by: igor_ats
Without any stars nearby to heat them up and wandering in the void of space not tethered in orbit to any other planets or stars than they would be:
1 - very cold, as cold as you can get without any sun - inhospitable to life (like pluto but worse).
2 - atmosphere destroyed?
3 - unlikely to be some sort of wellspring of life ppl think.
originally posted by: igor_ats
Without any stars nearby to heat them up and wandering in the void of space not tethered in orbit to any other planets or stars than they would be:
1 - very cold, as cold as you can get without any sun - inhospitable to life (like pluto but worse).
2 - atmosphere destroyed?
3 - unlikely to be some sort of wellspring of life ppl think.
originally posted by: wildespace
originally posted by: igor_ats
Without any stars nearby to heat them up and wandering in the void of space not tethered in orbit to any other planets or stars than they would be:
1 - very cold, as cold as you can get without any sun - inhospitable to life (like pluto but worse).
2 - atmosphere destroyed?
3 - unlikely to be some sort of wellspring of life ppl think.
1 - A rogue planet maybe heated internally for billions of years by radioactive decay and left-over heat from its formation. Life can exist underneath the surface, such as in an underground ocean, or perhaps voids filled with gasses.
2 - Why would it be destroyed. Far away from any star, there won't be any solar wind to strip the atmosphere away.
3 - We know very little about where life can or cannot exist. Earth is our only known example of a habitable environment.