Grand Army of the Republic newly created in Maine

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: stumason


What a load of bollocks... She was in Scotland on the 4th naming the new Carrier, she was in France in June and Italy in April. Let me guess, your a "Freeman"?

OT - This "Grand Army", is it just a a couple of dozen redneck types who hate the "guberment"?

What I was thinking.

Wanna bet they have big scruffy beards and ware dirty scruffy camo jackets

I put money at least one lives in a trailer

Yeah cuz angry white mountainmen are the only people disgruntled with our government. LOL! Thats how they attempt to marginalize the opposition. Anyone opposed to the agenda is treated like some country bumpkin who refuses to move along with the times. Completely ignore the fact that all the statements about the usurpation of power from the american people are true. Some people deserve the amount of tyranny they get. Mainly the ones who criticize others for being discontent and having the gall to speak out about it. People who have probably never stood up for anything in their lives seem to always have the most to say about someone else doing it. People like you are no better than the people we are trying to kick out of office. What makes you any better than one of those bearded men in camo jackets? What gives a person who lives in a house more credibility than someone who lives in a trailer? Your point of view is a total joke. FYI id rather have someone who can rebuild a motor and survive in the woods than some suburbanite who probably cant even fix his lawnmower. Just a thought.

Just as an aside, Kevin Arnette is a Canadian, he was a minister (religious) and his initial research was into the 18th, 19th and 20th century genocide and abuse of North American Indian children. As far as I know he has no legal standing in the US, either directly or by proxy. Even though that is the case it appears he is trying to whip up a new "brand" or meme of some kind for society. As far as being able to arrest perps and execute legal orders, it's wishful thinking. He can prosecute them however, anyone can have a kangaroo court, whether its actions are based in the legitimate or the delusional.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: rustyclutch

I assume your one of those fore mentioned people.

Hey when you actually stop talking more than BS and put your money were your mouth is and Civil war 2 actually kicks off in the USA il happily come over and help you guys.

But all it is is big man talk.

No one takes you seriously! Thats the problem!

It your point of view thats a joke. That a few weirdo old woodmen will actually be taken seriously in any capability!

a reply to: crazyewok

I'm actually a 33 year old Black Male. Ironic isnt it. Which is my point. Anyone who doesnt like whats going on has to be some racist living in the woods according to shills like yourself. In actuality there are lots of people who are disillusioned including young black males that one might think would be his greatest supporters. So keep shilling. Keep making generalizations about the types of people who oppose the status quo. Keep getting egg on your face.

originally posted by: rustyclutch
a reply to: crazyewok

I'm actually a 33 year old Black Male. Ironic isnt it.

Well then wake up.

A revolution is more than a few weird old men talking smack.

You need respectable, educated people behind your cause before anyone takes it even slightly seriously!

Those weirdy beardies in camo jackets may have there uses but wont last 10 seconds if if they tried something and they were the only ones then nothing will happen, they will just ended up isolated and laughed at best at worse the Fed will just round them up and lock em up as domestic terrorists.

originally posted by: rustyclutch
has to be some racist l

Your whole argument is therefore void for pulling the race card when I never even mentioned it.

a reply to: crazyewok

im not saying it is but if it actually is something put out by General Ham, he's not one of those weird old moutainman redneck crazies you speak of.

originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
a reply to: crazyewok

im not saying it is but if it actually is something put out by General Ham, he's not one of those weird old moutainman redneck crazies you speak of.

IF

And even then you need a few Generals and SANE politicians.

I would love to see a western version of Arab Spring.

BUT

It needs TWO things.

1) To start in the USA
2) A charismatic leader
3) A foreign backer who will supply arms
4) Money

a reply to: crazyewok



You dont even know whats going on behind the scenes. You are the one talking smack. Trying to discredit and derail something that you have no clue of instead of supporting someone for trying. Hardcore shilling. This is the reason nobody accomplishes anything because of haters such as yourself. You dont have agree with everyones methods but the least you could do is respect the people resisting. Its not like anyone is asking you to take up arms or finance anything. You could just sit back and see. Its the hater in you that wont let you. Or you work for the enemy.

a reply to: crazyewok

"if" is the key word and i do agree with your reply but to write it off as ridiculous before it has even been validated is error. I'm waiting to see what the General has to say about this on monday, if he has anything to say

originally posted by: CloudsTasteMetallic

I wonder how many folks took the initial words of the Founding Fathers as "a bunch of boobies making claims?"

Declaration of Independence, 2.0

The Founding Fathers were formal delegates appointed or elected by the governments of the thirteen original colonies and invested with the full power and authority to make declarations, govern the infant country, and prosecute the war. They were given the authority by the future states. These folks (or is it just one?) have not and do not, and that makes ALL the difference!

Sounds like folks who expect a civil war ... or want a civil war ... and they have stated clearly and in public which side they expect to be on. I don't know if anything comes of this or not. I'm thinking nothing will.

a reply to: Chiftel

the future can only be socialist or dystopian
this person understands what's going on

a reply to: crazyewok

Everyone knows what the doublespeak for bearded people that live in trailers is. Dont be coy. Sometimes insinuations and generalizations are more offensive than outright racism. Nobody played any race card. You threw out a stereotype and then implied that i fit your generalization. I simply pointed out Im the opposite of a bearded white man. Typical shill. Create arguments to redirect from what the original topic was all about. Stop trying to marginalize the opposition.

originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
a reply to: crazyewok

"if" is the key word and i do agree with your reply but to write it off as ridiculous before it has even been validated is error. I'm waiting to see what the General has to say about this on monday, if he has anything to say

I doubt it.

A General with even half sense would know now not the time. Theres a lot of work needed.

If it real? Well he obviously has no sense. I wouldn't follow such a man.

The best time is to wait until the next financial cluster F and its coming.

originally posted by: rustyclutch
a reply to: crazyewok

Everyone knows what the doublespeak for bearded people that live in trailers is. Dont be coy. Sometimes insinuations and generalizations are more offensive than outright racism. Nobody played any race card. You threw out a stereotype and then implied that i fit your generalization. I simply pointed out Im the opposite of a bearded white man. Typical shill. Create arguments to redirect from what the original topic was all about. Stop trying to marginalize the opposition.

Anyone that use the term shill for someone in disagreement in a debate arguments invalid too.

originally posted by: Montana

originally posted by: CloudsTasteMetallic

I wonder how many folks took the initial words of the Founding Fathers as "a bunch of boobies making claims?"

Declaration of Independence, 2.0

The Founding Fathers were formal delegates appointed or elected by the governments of the thirteen original colonies and invested with the full power and authority to make declarations, govern the infant country, and prosecute the war. They were given the authority by the future states. These folks (or is it just one?) have not and do not, and that makes ALL the difference!

Didn't stop the Confederates did it?

a reply to: crazyewok

While i respect your opinion I don't think you're in any position to dictate what is or isn't foolish in the field of military tactics

originally posted by: crazyewok

originally posted by: Montana

originally posted by: CloudsTasteMetallic

I wonder how many folks took the initial words of the Founding Fathers as "a bunch of boobies making claims?"

Declaration of Independence, 2.0

The Founding Fathers were formal delegates appointed or elected by the governments of the thirteen original colonies and invested with the full power and authority to make declarations, govern the infant country, and prosecute the war. They were given the authority by the future states. These folks (or is it just one?) have not and do not, and that makes ALL the difference!

Didn't stop the Confederates did it?

Sorry, but the Confederates were made up of elected officials at the very beginning of the American Civil War

Do some reading on our history first before you start commenting on it.

originally posted by: crazyewok

Didn't stop the Confederates did it?

Not sure what you are on about here. The confederate government was made of representatives of the several confederate states, appointed or elected by their state's government as well. They were also given the full authority of the states they represented to form a government just as the original founding fathers were.

The members of this group are not representatives of the state governments, and so do not have the authority to appoint a lunch committee, let alone an "army".

Follow me here?