It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The New York Times reported today investigators discovered the jet had not soared and swooped as they believed earlier, but remained in controlled flight for hours after contact was lost, until it ran out of fuel over the southern Indian Ocean.
It said they concluded this after a re-examination of the military radar data and the pings the aircraft exchanged with an Inmarsat satellite over the Equator showed that the radar's altitude readings appeared to be incorrect.
An international review found Malaysia's radar equipment had not been calibrated with enough precision for the readings to be accurate, the NYT said.
originally posted by: aLLeKs
The New York Times reported today investigators discovered the jet had not soared and swooped as they believed earlier, but remained in controlled flight for hours after contact was lost, until it ran out of fuel over the southern Indian Ocean.
It said they concluded this after a re-examination of the military radar data and the pings the aircraft exchanged with an Inmarsat satellite over the Equator showed that the radar's altitude readings appeared to be incorrect.
An international review found Malaysia's radar equipment had not been calibrated with enough precision for the readings to be accurate, the NYT said.
Malaysian military radar data on MH370 wrong, says report
Ok, seriously after 4!! months they find out, that the radar data is wrong?
I mean come on, what do they reveal next? That they still had contact?
Every week we get reports that reveal that we have been lied to. This can't be a coincidence. It show a totla lack of professionalism by the Malaysian authorities.
We will never ever know what happened to the plane, because it seems they don't want us to know.
originally posted by: lightedhype
I just do not get the purpose if this is the case. Why on earth would any hijacker, simply fly over the ocean until running out of fuel? Makes absolutely no sense, for anybody.
and Yes the plane was hijacked, be it by the pilot or a third party but it was hijacked. Some people still do not seem to know that!!
If the plane is going the wrong way, turned off transponders, and is not responding to radio contact the damned thing is hijacked! Whether the pilot is still flying or not....sheesh.
It didn't take them 4 months, I think it took less than a week to figure that out. Maybe you've been asleep for the last 4 months if you missed it, but it was widely known by the middle of March that the altitudes on the Malaysian military radar had to be wrong because it showed an altitude that was above the plane's maximum ceiling.
originally posted by: aLLeKs
Ok, seriously after 4!! months they find out, that the radar data is wrong?
After falling off of civilian radar, radar signals from the Malaysian military appear to show the Boeing 777 climbing above the plane's maximum ceiling to 45,000 feet
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
It didn't take them 4 months, I think it took less than a week to figure that out. Maybe you've been asleep for the last 4 months if you missed it, but it was widely known by the middle of March that the altitudes on the Malaysian military radar had to be wrong because it showed an altitude that was above the plane's maximum ceiling.
originally posted by: aLLeKs
Ok, seriously after 4!! months they find out, that the radar data is wrong?
Here's an article from March 14:
www.businessinsider.com...-5323af22eab8e a03111ad617
After falling off of civilian radar, radar signals from the Malaysian military appear to show the Boeing 777 climbing above the plane's maximum ceiling to 45,000 feet
Actually that was my first thought too but at that time in the flight, it still had too much fuel to reach that altitude. Maybe later in the flight after burning off some fuel it would be possible.
originally posted by: Psynic
Contrary to your statement, the MH370 was capable of reaching the altitude of 45,000' and therefore the radar was NOT "widely known to be wrong' on that basis.
originally posted by: lightedhype
I just do not get the purpose if this is the case. Why on earth would any hijacker, simply fly over the ocean until running out of fuel? Makes absolutely no sense, for anybody.
and Yes the plane was hijacked, be it by the pilot or a third party but it was hijacked. Some people still do not seem to know that!!
If the plane is going the wrong way, turned off transponders, and is not responding to radio contact the damned thing is hijacked! Whether the pilot is still flying or not....sheesh.
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: aLLeKs
Inmarsat said this early in their investigation, they are professionals in their field and have carefully examined all the data before releasing any details.
Some people are just looking for a government conspiracy and are refusing to listen to the facts from Inmarsat, instead
inventing their own theories based on media speculation and inaccurate information from the likes of the Malaysian authorities.
originally posted by: smurfy
originally posted by: theabsolutetruth
a reply to: aLLeKs
Inmarsat said this early in their investigation, they are professionals in their field and have carefully examined all the data before releasing any details.
Some people are just looking for a government conspiracy and are refusing to listen to the facts from Inmarsat, instead
inventing their own theories based on media speculation and inaccurate information from the likes of the Malaysian authorities.
There are some in 'the field' who frankly feel that Inmarsat have got it wrong. Yes, I've just made a blank baldy statement like yours.
So I could ask a couple of questions, like where was the satellite when MH370 was waiting for take-off, and what was MH370's motion at the time, they should all be known..since it hadn't taken off.