It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: kruphix
It seems like there is some mis-information going on. It isn't just that one hard drive crashed, it is how the IRS stores emails.
From what I've read, they have a very low limit on how many emails an individual can store at one time...something like around 2000 emails. Anyone that uses email for business can tell you that 2000 emails is very small. I probably get 2000 emails in a single month, and that is probably a conservative estimate. Once you hit that limit, your only option is to archive on your hard drive or delete them. So it is possible that if your hard drive crashes, then you will lose older emails. Remember, not all of her emails are missing...they have a large chunk of them...but they think that the smoking gun is in this group of emails that are missing. In my opinion, that is just the GOP wanting to give something for their supporters to cling onto.
The other thing I am hearing in this thread is that they should all be backed up. At one time they probably were, but a backup is not the same as an archive. A backup is a snapshot of the current state of the system to restore to. To save space, many backup systems overwrite older backups with the newer backups. So at any one point you can probably only restore back to a certain point, not the beginning of time. From what I have read, the IRS did not have an electronic archive system that archived everything.
Is it a poor system...yes, but according to all sources I have read...that is what the IRS had. And in a type of system like this, yes, a single hard drive crash could lose locally archived emails forever.
originally posted by: kruphix
Or are you just making things up on the fly with no supporting sources?
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: kruphix
It seems like there is some mis-information going on. It isn't just that one hard drive crashed, it is how the IRS stores emails.
Then why is the official story that Lois Lerner's hard drive had been 'recycled' after it crashed, and that is why her emails are lost forever.
I guess you didn't read the rest of my post that explains why.
The other thing I am hearing in this thread is that they should all be backed up. At one time they probably were, but a backup is not the same as an archive. A backup is a snapshot of the current state of the system to restore to. To save space, many backup systems overwrite older backups with the newer backups. So at any one point you can probably only restore back to a certain point, not the beginning of time. From what I have read, the IRS did not have an electronic archive system that archived everything.
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: kruphix
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: kruphix
It seems like there is some mis-information going on. It isn't just that one hard drive crashed, it is how the IRS stores emails.
Then why is the official story that Lois Lerner's hard drive had been 'recycled' after it crashed, and that is why her emails are lost forever.
I guess you didn't read the rest of my post that explains why.
I did read it.
The other thing I am hearing in this thread is that they should all be backed up. At one time they probably were, but a backup is not the same as an archive. A backup is a snapshot of the current state of the system to restore to. To save space, many backup systems overwrite older backups with the newer backups. So at any one point you can probably only restore back to a certain point, not the beginning of time. From what I have read, the IRS did not have an electronic archive system that archived everything.
The IRS is required by law to back every email up, by law.
I have already posted a link that shows that the IRS has a manual that indicates that all of their emails are in a Microsoft platform that stores the emails externally.
I work for a small company.... not the IRS. We back up everything to our server daily and everything is backed up on tape weekly.
It was seven hard drive crashes, the lack of a centralized archive, a practice of erasing and reusing backup tapes every six months, and an IRS policy of allowing employees to decide for themselves which e-mails constitute an official agency record.
The IRS would not comment publicly on its document retention policies, but information provided to congressional investigators points to systemic problems with records management at the tax agency.
Republicans have been over the available documents hundreds of times and they can't find crap that shows anything illegal was done. So this is their last desperate attempt at not looking like idiots...they will blame "missing emails"...and hold on to the notion that all the answers are in these missing emails even though they have thousands of other emails that show nothing.
originally posted by: kruphix
a reply to: howmuch4another
I'll share the same link I have with others, it was the first one I found in a google search.
www.usatoday.com...
This isn't secret information, most sources (besides Fox News) are reporting on this.
said Nancy Flynn, founder of the ePolicy Institute, a Columbus, Ohio, training and consulting firm.
said Melanie Sloan, the director of Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, a liberal-leaning watchdog group.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: kruphix
Republicans have been over the available documents hundreds of times and they can't find crap that shows anything illegal was done. So this is their last desperate attempt at not looking like idiots...they will blame "missing emails"...and hold on to the notion that all the answers are in these missing emails even though they have thousands of other emails that show nothing.
And you see nothing odd that there are missing emails for Ms. Lerner.
It all boils down to this: You will go to any length to support the administration.
Some people (like WH Press Secretaries) have to be paid handsomely to tow the line to such lengths.
originally posted by: TDawgRex
a reply to: kruphix
Total and complete BS saying that incompetence is an excuse. I used to work for the Gov't and they can get anything they want that was passed through their servers. I know...I experienced it. I was the one under investigation.
And a Congressman and his staff (whom I didn't vote for) did his job and found all the relevant emails. (I did keep back-ups of everything by the way)
My career was saved and I was allowed to retire and the two yabooheads that tried to implicate me in other shenanigans were canned.
ALL THOSE EMAILS EXIST!
originally posted by: whywhynot
a reply to: TDawgRex
Only course that would stop this is to throw them all out. Let them know who they represent.
It all boils down to this: Some people can't see through fake manufactured scandals and they eat them up like a soap opera. Some people need this in order to maintain their hate for the other side. I prefer to focus on the issues and not the fake controversies used to entertain the masses.
originally posted by: TDawgRex
a reply to: kruphix
No...I worked for the DoD, which is a hell of a lot bigger than the IRS. If a entity as big as the DoD can control it's servers and archive/back up everything, then so can the IRS.
You're using emotion in a rational argument. That equals...FAIL.
No objective lawyer who has been involved in “eDiscovery” — the discovery during litigation of emails and other electronic documents — will credit the Obama administration’s claim that, by accident, years of Lois Lerner’s emails were irretrievably lost. John explained why here.
Moreover, as Bryan Preston at PJ Media reports, a former IRS IT specialist is equally skeptical. The individual in question worked on the IRS’s contract with Computer Sciences Corporation to modernize the agency’s digital record-keeping system. He finds it difficult to believe that the IRS could have lost two years’ worth of Lois Lerner’s emails.
He notes first that U.S. law, specifically 44 U.S.C. Chapter 33, requires that agencies must notify the Archivist of any records that are destroyed and the reasons for destroying them. In addition, federal regulations establish strict recoverability and redundancy requirements. Disposal of records outside these standards requires permission in writing.
Lois Lerner’s emails — a former IRS IT specialist’s take