It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
If I said an invisible man in the sky holds galaxies together, how is that any different than claiming dark matter does the same thing?
originally posted by: Another_Nut
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
Fail
You cannot say a stealth made the attack
Yiu can only say A detonation occoured
If you knew it was a plane then it is know
Dark matter/energy and god for that matter
Is not known
If it cant be observed or experimented on then it is not science
You saw stealth
Now show me darkmatter/energy
originally posted by: Another_Nut
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
How do those smart people know there is a plane when all they have is an explosion
You really did fail in your attempt
A smart person wouldnt rule out any possibilities when there is no proof
And without seeing that stealth there is no proof
The explosion could be from hundred s of different things
Its the ignorant who would assume it was a plane
originally posted by: Another_Nut
a reply to: OccamsRazor04
You are now trying to change the subject
So if an explosion occurs anywhere smart people will automatically believe a stealth dropped it?
No
another fail.
This paper claims some proof:
originally posted by: Another_Nut
A smart person wouldnt rule out any possibilities when there is no proof
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
If I said an invisible man in the sky holds galaxies together, how is that any different than claiming dark matter does the same thing?
A stealth bomber makes an attack.
The scientist says the plane was there and launched a missile, but we can't detect the plane.
You are suggesting an invisible plane is religious nonsense and instead electrical effects caused an explosion.
One of those sounds like religious nonsense at least ....
TB condemns my pointing out that a similarity in appearance of certain objects might indicate they have a common cause, e.g., the Grand Canyon and Lichtenberg patterns formed in grass by lightning strokes.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
originally posted by: grey580
So the question then begs.
What is gravity really?
Given that gravity obeys an inverse square law, it's most likely an electrical property of matter. That also means there is probably some way to manipulate the field.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
a reply to: Mon1k3r
Blacklight just released another video, again demonstrating they can achieve 100 billion watts per liter power production from a water based fuel.
The nay-sayers can scream it's a scam all day long, but the results speak for themselves.
originally posted by: mbkennel
If it were so, then gravity would be related to electrical & isotopic properties of matter, but it doesn't appear so, it is determined by mass and mass alone as far as anybody can find.
originally posted by: mbkennel
Yeah. Blacklight is releasing another video, and not a product for purchase. That does speak for itself.
Haven't they been saying that for decades? HydroCatalysis Inc., the original incarnation of Blacklight Power, was founded in 1991, which was 23 years ago.
originally posted by: AnarchoCapitalist
it shouldn't be too much longer before their generator hits the market.