It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: Moresby
Clearly this statement isn't true:
lol In reality i couldn't care less about 9/11... Im over it, so that statement isn't true
originally posted by: hgfbob
yet WTC7,NOT hit by a plane OR falling tower debris,
Captain Chris Boyle Engine 94 - 18 years Boyle: ...on the north and east side of 7 it didn’t look like there was any damage at all, but then you looked on the south side of 7 there had to be a hole 20 stories tall in the building, with fire on several floors. Debris was falling down on the building and it didn’t look good. Firehouse: When you looked at the south side, how close were you to the base of that side? Boyle: I was standing right next to the building, probably right next to it. Firehouse: When you had fire on the 20 floors, was it in one window or many? Boyle: There was a huge gaping hole and it was scattered throughout there. It was a huge hole. I would say it was probably about a third of it, right in the middle of it. And so after Visconti came down and said nobody goes in 7, we said all right, we’ll head back to the command post. We lost touch with him. I never saw him again that day.
Deputy Chief Peter Hayden Division 1 - 33 years ...also we were pretty sure that 7 World Trade Center would collapse. Early on, we saw a bulge in the southwest corner between floors 10 and 13, and we had put a transit on that and we were pretty sure she was going to collapse. You actually could see there was a visible bulge, it ran up about three floors. It came down about 5 o’clock in the afternoon, but by about 2 o’clock in the afternoon we realized this thing was going to collapse. Firehouse: Was there heavy fire in there right away? Hayden: No, not right away, and that’s probably why it stood for so long because it took a while for that fire to develop. It was a heavy body of fire in there and then we didn’t make any attempt to fight it. That was just one of those wars we were just going to lose. We were concerned about the collapse of a 47-story building there. We were worried about additional collapse there of what was remaining standing of the towers and the Marriott, so we started pulling the people back after a couple of hours of surface removal and searches along the surface of the debris. We started to pull guys back because we were concerned for their safety.
originally posted by: Flatcoat
a reply to: Xcathdra
People need to understand that when buildings are constructed, they are done so in manner that will equalize / distribute the weight of the building evenly. All it takes is the failure of one support column to cause a shift in weight balance. That will overburden other support columns, eventually leading to a failure.
Right..because it's happened so many times before..ever heard of redundancy? "OSers" are always asking "truthers" for proof, so show me proof of this alleged girder walkoff at column 79. And I don't mean some crappy, totally unrealistic computer sim.
originally posted by: Revelations29
Same thing with the 9/11 commission report. I have a copy right here and there is no mention of a 47 story building collapsing! How does an investigative report not mention a skyscraper collapsing?!?!?
9/11 was a MOSSAD operation
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: Moresby
Well...You are kind of right, i'm just tired of the same BS being posted again and again when clearly there is no proof of WTC 7 being demolished on purpose but there is clearly evidence of the opposite , but i have made up my mind based on facts not on theories so therefore i am over it but will still participate in discussions.
What about the rest of my post...Don't you have a comment on that, i asked you to provide some counter proof??
Part 3: After 9/11
The culminating chapter of the historical exhibition takes visitors from the immediate aftermath of 9/11 to the present moment, exploring the character and challenges of the post-9/11 world. From presentations on collective grief, global responses, and the search for the missing in the immediate days and weeks after the attacks, the exhibition will explore the prodigious efforts of recovery and rebuilding at the three attack sites, describing innumerable acts of compassion, volunteerism and public service. A final alcove presents the ongoing questions arising out of 9/11, and the evolving nature of how we understand its significance and place in history.
Those who believe in the conspiracy promoted by the government are very scared of the WTC7 evidence.
two words ...dancing israelis. If wtc7 is the smoking gun, then the 5 israelis who were 'documenting' the event are the smoking cannons.
@hellobruce...
Yes, there is always at least one.... "Blame the Jews"!!
originally posted by: Mianeye
a reply to: Moresby
Those who believe in the conspiracy promoted by the government are very scared of the WTC7 evidence.
What evidence, because there is no factual evidence, there are just theories from conspiracist picking things out of content.
the Government thinks that omitting building 7 falling they can conceal the truth
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: RocksFromSpace
I don't think anyone died in the collapse of bldg 7.