It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: Kalomar
and
a reply to: XPLodER
I admit to being somewhat out of my element in regards to network technology, so my concerns may be baseless. I just have read enough about issues like the Silk Road takedown, bitcoin theft from that one bitcoin "bank manager" (don't know how else to describe the guy), and the general fact that while Bitcoin claims anonymity, the blocks where the transaction data is stored is fully open. I just don't understand how that works. It seems to me like you can either have data safety and anonymity or you can have transaction transparency, but not both.
My other issue revolves around the fact that, regardless of what proxy DNS you're using or so-called "Deep-Web" you're directing your information through, on the ends you're still using some manner of regulated ISP. I don't think the FBI stumbled upon the Silk Road, I think they simply waited a few blocks away from it, watched people go down the street with full wallets, and then watched them return with bags full of stuff... so to speak. That's not going to change. The ISPs will continue to serve as government watchdogs and censors. If anything, I see the open transparency of this block chain stuff to serve as an even more accurate tool for agencies to track online activities of an individual over multiple networks.
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
a reply to: burdman30ott6
if anybody thinks they are safe and secure on the internet, they are just plain wrong.
It's like quantum physics, you find or prove something works a certain way and all you get back are more questions.
Even the best of hackers and network guys these days have a hard time staying secret. If they really want to find you, they can.
~Tenth
originally posted by: UKWO1Phot
a reply to: PhoenixOD
Google.. LOL..
Just out of interest Xploder, have you run a sim to see what happens when ALL the coins are mined in the bitcoin algorithm?
originally posted by: Richardus
Here's an article about it: www.businessinsider.com...
originally posted by: UKWO1Phot
a reply to: XPLodER
Looks like thy've just made it public on github
Link
Yes and no. Almost everything in this BIP is quite literally truthful. Only the two sarcastic statements (Satoshi's. C++ mastery and the PHP fib) betray the BIP as April 1st material.
Particularly, the code as implemented today will do what the BIP says it will do. The reward will fold back to 50 BTC per block. Yes, the code as written has this behavior. It's just that this cluster# will happen around every two hundred years or so.
In other words, we have been quite literally mistaken all along -- Bitcoin isn't actually a finite supply currency pegged at 21M base units. That the author of the BIP decided to refer to this phenomenon as "Satoshi modeling the discovery of four mines every mibilenium" which is a valid inference based on the code is an absolute stroke of genius.
That's what makes this BIP the bestest of April Fools' jokes in the Bitcoin community.