LRS-B (new stealth bomber) speculation

yf-24??
www.stormclimb.com...

a reply to: kingofyo1

That looks a lot like this post, which still isn't it.

a reply to: Zaphod58

yall mentioned something about the 24 being boeing based, and it looked promising.. lol back to drawing board/google images!

BTW Missed ya Zaph!

Its got tails on it...just a hint

a reply to: boomer135

If it was publically sourced would you be in violation of your NDA by pointing them in its general direction or giving them a search term?

a reply to: boomer135

is it a swept wing design or fixed?

I'm not gonna take the chance. Because its not labeled if I point it out then I might be. Like whoever posted it in the first place didn't point it out so its a fine line.

originally posted by: kingofyo1
a reply to: boomer135

is it a swept wing design or fixed?

The main thing wrong with that is the dates on there...

Edit: its also missing a key feature

The only purpose and practical use of such a long range bomber would be to deliver nuclear weapons.

originally posted by: libertytoall
The only purpose and practical use of such a long range bomber would be to deliver nuclear weapons.

Where did you come up with this?

a reply to: libertytoall

You mean like the B-2 only delivers nuclear weapons? Oh....wait......

a reply to: boomer135

you mean the EW feature laser? or is there something else i'm missing... and Boom, I've got no idea what else you would be referring to otherwise haha gimme some rope to hang myself, another way to go looking... and yeah, by those dates this should have been out and about for damn near a decade

No its a rather large part of the jets design. Very noticeable. Maybe someone will guess what it could be. Think control surfaces. And that's all I'm gonna say...

a reply to: boomer135

Oh! Oh! I know! I know!

a reply to: Zaphod58

oh what the hell im feeling generous tonight.....

so it borrowed the forward canards from a sukhoi design?? wtf! or did the suk pull em from the 24 design first?

a reply to: kingofyo1

Take a closer look.

a reply to: Zaphod58

his mod to the pic is (i think) showing that the canards swing out and back to fold in?

a reply to: kingofyo1

Zaph, on the details I'm seeing the nozzles listed as thrust vectoring 2-d... Is this supposed to be mainly a navy craft???

a reply to: boomer135
This pic is for a fighter not a bomber ? or is it the same technology but bigger ? may be the same design but with a delta wing I feel Boeing will win the contest