Is Weather Engineering Becoming Geo-Engineering?

a reply to: oldcarpy

Yeah.... still no answer... are you a politian?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

What question are you wanting an answer to?

a reply to: oldcarpy

Are you ok that they are/will spray aluminium in the sky?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

No. Messing with nature is generally a bad idea.

a reply to: oldcarpy

It is a shame that the rich and powerful do not feel the same way.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: oldcarpy

Are you ok that they are/will spray aluminium in the sky?

Will they?

Are they?

a reply to: InhaleExhale

Who knows?
I am only going on what oldcarpy linked me to.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

But no one is actually doing it - it's only "studies".

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: InhaleExhale

Who knows?
I am only going on what oldcarpy linked me to.

It doesn't say they will or are spraying aluminum but that in the future they may try aluminum oxide or even diamonds, this is an idea or plan of what to do and try after the things they are going to use like water and calcium carbonate that will tried by 2022.

I assume this is proposed if the experiment is still on going and not stopped by then, as its debatable if it would do benefit or more harm and if they haven't had any results with the other substances they first proposed to use.

a reply to: InhaleExhale

It was written over 2 years ago...... is there any results published? Any follow up at all to read?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Yes, if you look at the 2nd Guardian article I linked to that was March 2019.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: oldcarpy

Are you totally convinced that there is no geoengineering, via sky spraying, happening?

I wish I was....

The problem is that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever to suggest that geoengineering is underway via "sky spraying"

a reply to: mrthumpy

I get up and the sky is clear blue and then the slim streaks appear that spread out all across the sky and leave the sky overcast.

I see it with my own eyes..... that is evidence to me.

Condensation vapors should not do that.

If no clouds were present prior to the streaks/trails then why do the trails not evaporate?

Mike West has many replies to his explanation...... they do not agree with his answer.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: mrthumpy


Condensation vapors should not do that.

Because you say so. Physics disagrees however.


Let me ask you this though - if condensation can't spread out and leave the sky overcast, then how can a trail of chemicals?

a reply to: Itisnowagain

I get up and the sky is clear blue and then the slim streaks appear that spread out all across the sky and leave the sky overcast. I see it with my own eyes..... that is evidence to me. Condensation vapors should not do that.

Contrails are essentially the same as clouds so do clouds always evaporate? Why do you think they "should not do that"? Did you not read the simple explanations available on the site i linked to?

These are commercial aircraft carrying passengers, baggage and fuel. If you think that they are also spraying miles and miles of chemicals then where the hell do they store it all?

originally posted by: oldcarpy
a reply to: Itisnowagain

I get up and the sky is clear blue and then the slim streaks appear that spread out all across the sky and leave the sky overcast. I see it with my own eyes..... that is evidence to me. Condensation vapors should not do that.

Contrails are essentially the same as clouds so do clouds always evaporate?

This is the most obvious problem with the chemtrail claim and I really cannot understand how the believers do not spot it.

Their entire claim is based around their belief that condensation (CLOUDS) cannot grow and cover the sky yet somehow a trail of chemicals can.

originally posted by: Itisnowagain
a reply to: oldcarpy

Are you totally convinced that there is no geoengineering, via sky spraying, happening?

I wish I was....

there may be. If you do the real research into this, and look at science, and not Dane Wiggington, you can learn about what you see, and then learn that what you don't see, could be of great concern.

If you just want to believe in chemtrails, ignore everything, and enjoy that. But if you want facts and truth, look into things like atmospheric levels, conditions for persistent contrails, how incoming weather might be a factor.

Once you understand your fears are misguided, then you can focus on geo-engineering, understand what it is, and what atmospheric levels it's proposed to be used at, if it would even be visible to someone on the ground.

Remove the fear, and let common sense and facts in a bit. Or not.

I don't care what it is that is speading out across the sky..... I want natural blue sky.

Regardless..... all that extra clouding cannot be good for the planet.... it is not natural.

a reply to: Itisnowagain

Clouds are not natural, then?

a reply to: oldcarpy

Clouds are natural.

Trails from aircraft are not.

If there were no planes there would be no vapor trails. Am I incorrect?