It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: Answer
First of all, the earth is only 6,000 years old so phooey to all that "50 million, 30 million, 20 million" nonsense.
Secondly, it's obvious that the different elephant bones are proof that god couldn't make up his mind about the final design so he kept changing it. I mean, duh.
Once he came up with the elephant we all know and love, he said "ok, that one's just right" and tossed all the other ones into various layers of the earth's surface to confuse scientists so they'd look super stupid to us creationists.
Really, you want to post for me, isnt that a little presumptuous, a little arrogant, maybe a little rude.
Seriously you want to be that type of person, evidently
How about I post what I think you would say
Along the lines of how .......
No I wont become you
thats basically what creationists ARE saying though. they just like to dress it up in pretty bows and glitter before delivering it. i hope you'll forgive mr answer for skipping that step.
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: TzarChasm
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: Answer
First of all, the earth is only 6,000 years old so phooey to all that "50 million, 30 million, 20 million" nonsense.
Secondly, it's obvious that the different elephant bones are proof that god couldn't make up his mind about the final design so he kept changing it. I mean, duh.
Once he came up with the elephant we all know and love, he said "ok, that one's just right" and tossed all the other ones into various layers of the earth's surface to confuse scientists so they'd look super stupid to us creationists.
Really, you want to post for me, isnt that a little presumptuous, a little arrogant, maybe a little rude.
Seriously you want to be that type of person, evidently
How about I post what I think you would say
Along the lines of how .......
No I wont become you
thats basically what creationists ARE saying though. they just like to dress it up in pretty bows and glitter before delivering it. i hope you'll forgive mr answer for skipping that step.
It is really incredibly sad that you dont understand the creationist argument, no idea at all.
I mean any educated person is first taught to understand the opposing views, then consider it and find issues that can be tested.
There is no science in these arguments that is pertinent, just silly comments about what you postulate the opposing position believes
Evolution is the painted pig that scientists date, it has no repeatable testable observable data, yet you are in love.
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
(Facepalm) Oh please, tell me that you're serious and not pulling our legs?
originally posted by: borntowatch
originally posted by: AngryCymraeg
(Facepalm) Oh please, tell me that you're serious and not pulling our legs?
i could do a facepalm thing but
I am not calling my belief a science, know its not repeatable observable and testable.
The onus is not on me to prove anything, I am not using science, science by its very definition is data. Just show me the data
originally posted by: fixitwcw
a reply to: borntowatch
but there must be some truth to what you are saying to cause such blowback.
originally posted by: fixitwcw
a reply to: GetHyped
he was right about those terms being acceptable. which is what i said, and stand by, while you thrash about. disgusting.
originally posted by: fixitwcw
a reply to: borntowatch
i have no idea who you are.... but you have many enemies on here. lol. i believe in a "god/intelligent universe/karma/natural law/etc. but i believe religion of any sort is the scourge of the earth, as it gave rise to the state and all other of man-kinds ills. but there must be some truth to what you are saying to cause such blowback. i have two degrees in psychology, and am preparing to start on a bachelors in organic chemistry, i have heard these terms used, and in the exact same syntax for ALL of these types of evolution in the university community...... keep up the good work.
originally posted by: fixitwcw
i have heard these terms used, and in the exact same syntax for ALL of these types of evolution in the university community...... keep up the good work.
originally posted by: borntowatch
You only have links and you expect me to read them
originally posted by: borntowatch
All your science and logic is wrapped up in a few tardy little links that you provide.
I have asked you explain evolution and YOU cant.
You expect me to open them and read them and fall in to line and march along.
Evolution and its practitioners remind me of buddhists chanting their mantras.
If evolution is so well established why all the effort still, if its proven like gravity why all the theory still being thrown up, why all the study.
You only have links and you expect me to read them and become a drone like you. Doesnt work that way.
Now players, I am not asking for links, I am asking for reasoned logical discussion.
I have noticed you cant provide that, guessing you are all just a little to shallow minded in your theory to back up your angry attitudes.
See I believe that atheist evolution links have no valid science, just assumption.
The onus is on you to prove otherwise.
Or you can just walk away and accept I have a different opinion.
I guess that cant happen, you hate others believing something you dont accept, sheer minded bloody fundamentalists is all that is left.
originally posted by: borntowatch
The theory of cosmic evolution
www.extension.harvard.edu...
The theory of planetary evolution
www.umich.edu...
The theory of Chemical evolution
en.wikipedia.org...
I will stop there
So as you can see, these theorys are labelled as evolution, so when I say i dont believe in evolution I am not just talking about biological evolution.
Understand
All your science and logic is wrapped up in a few tardy little links that you provide.
I have asked you explain evolution and YOU cant.
You expect me to open them and read them and fall in to line and march along.
Evolution and its practitioners remind me of buddhists chanting their mantras.
If science proves some belief of Buddhism wrong, then Buddhism will have to change.
If evolution is so well established why all the effort still, if its proven like gravity why all the theory still being thrown up, why all the study.
You only have links and you expect me to read them and become a drone like you. Doesnt work that way.
Now players, I am not asking for links, I am asking for reasoned logical discussion.
I have noticed you cant provide that, guessing you are all just a little to shallow minded in your theory to back up your angry attitudes.
See I believe that atheist evolution links have no valid science, just assumption.
The onus is on you to prove otherwise.
Or you can just walk away and accept I have a different opinion.
I guess that cant happen, you hate others believing something you dont accept, sheer minded bloody fundamentalists is all that is left.