It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Gunsnfreedom.com published a photograph of the sign on May 21, making "The Pit" restaurant a self-declared gun free zone--the same kind of zone Michael Bloomberg and Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America pressure other restaurants into becoming. According to Durham's ABC 11, around 9 PM "three men wearing hoodies entered the restaurant through the back doors with pistols, and forced several staff members to lie on the floor." The armed men "also assaulted two employees during the crime."
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit
So are we supposed to assume that if they didn't have that sign they wouldn't have been robbed?
originally posted by: macman
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit
They should have made the sign bigger, and in many different languages.....and put the words in red with underlining.
Does anyone know if the workers pointed out the sign to the criminals?
originally posted by: jhn7537
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit
So are we supposed to assume that if they didn't have that sign they wouldn't have been robbed?
originally posted by: tothetenthpower
So the prevailing wisdom here is that if you want to have a gun free environment, you're being an idiot because some ahole with a gun WILL eventually come in and shoot the place up?
Sounds a bit circular if you ask me.
Isn't the problem that criminals can get guns illegally in the first place? Which is true because of the AMOUNT of guns currently in distribution?
I know the vast majority of gun control laws do nothing, because they only hurt responsible citizens. The focus needs to be on making guns harder to get for those we all agree should not have them.
Sort of an impossible task, but blaming those who wish to have no guns in their environment isn't the answer.
~Tenth
originally posted by: roadgravel
The problem is that illegal guns are the easiest to get. Just pay some money. All the red tape and hoops to prevent a criminal from buying a gun doesn't work because the criminal system of gun distribution doesn't use them.
originally posted by: Aleister
a reply to: ScientiaFortisDefendit
Kind of like getting served while wearing no shoes and no shirt in a "No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service" restaurant. And just because the sign says 'no firearms' doesn't mean the clerks aren't packing a shot-gun behind the counter.
originally posted by: ScientiaFortisDefendit
originally posted by: roadgravel
The problem is that illegal guns are the easiest to get. Just pay some money. All the red tape and hoops to prevent a criminal from buying a gun doesn't work because the criminal system of gun distribution doesn't use them.
I disagree. I am a law-abiding citizen, I know no criminals, and I would not know the first place to go to buy an "illegal gun", which by the way is another liberal semantic construct to associate "guns" with "illegal", like "gun violence".