It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
my apologies Randy I didn't intend to derail your thread. I'll quietly back out now.
Why would ancient man having more advanced tech than we currently think was possible disprove evolution???
because certainly that is occurring. I'm talking about the 'religion' of evolution.
If you believe in the biblical flood and Noah you almost have to believe in evolution as all earth animals could not come close to fitting on the ark. So explain the bio diversity around the world.
originally posted by: randyvs
I'll say it so you can't eacape understanding.
The marks in the rock disprove evolution if they don't fit
the theory. Period. Now what? Make em fit ?
And as far as your own beliefs about such matters I have no problem.
But I believe if mans history is more cyclical than linear. It definitely
works full bore in the defiance of evolutionary theory.
originally posted by: wtbengineer
Not just beyond what we think they had, but beyond what we have today was the statement. I am open to this possibility, and if it were true that would defy evolution since in this case we have obviously devolved since then.
originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: mOjOm
Even then, changes in Evolution aren't really considered to be simply positive or negative, they are just changes.
Well then where does this fit in what with what you're saying?