Two pics from Oilantaytambo that 100% defy evolution

And there is far more than these two pics from around the
world, that evolution doesn't begin to explain. I am against
evolution even more than I am atheism. Because with out
evolution? Atheism hasn't the boniest leg [snipped]
to stand on.

Look at this



What I see in this pic are saw marks. Or the absolute equivelant
diametrically. Even the theory of Ancient Aliens points to a flood,
or some " Great cataclysm "to have wiped away the inhabitants
and the tools, it would take to do this. Because not one tool that
could have achieved these grooves has been found. So how did they
get there?



And this pic I believe to be the most damaging evidence on the face
of the earth, when it comes to evolution. Notice how the rock has
sheared off after the rectangular blocks were tapped from the hill side.

I'll rest my case against evolution right here for now. And invite all who
may be displeased to express themselves.

I'm not understanding how these two pictures disprove the theory of evolution?

Those cut marks and that rock face could be only 3,500 years old.

a reply to: randyvs

I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. How do these disprove evolution? Is there a new way to date rocks I don't know about? How old are these?

More importantly, how do these things differ from some of the other ancient wonders?

a reply to: MystikMushroom

Im with you on this, im not sure what this has to do with evolution, it could be a good indicator of some prehistory we dont know about but.......

im not sure either

a reply to: randyvs

uhhh.. ok?

I don't see anything that defies evolution here...

The whole ancient alien theory holds more water then the idea of creationism... at least according to Christianity's idea of it...

Though I still say creationism and evolution go hand in hand...

Im thinking the case is still wide open.

what did the first or second picture have ti do with evolution?

A rock cutting denies science somehow and proves that the bible is right?

Maybe I'm not that smart to understand. But if course I'm an atheist so what do I know.

a reply to: randyvs

Dressing stone is a very old art. Inca Emperor Pachacuti built that city for goodness sake!

I don't know about you lot but if I was back in the day with basic tools and lack of sod all, then cutting out rocks perfectly would not be the first thing on my list.

As it stands though, this argument will go on for a long time because nobody at all has the correct answers with proof.

Like the others here. How the hell does this relate to evolution???? In what way does this disprove evolution???

Also, how the hell do you get 3 stars for a post that nobody as of yet even understands???

a reply to: randyvs

Because with out
evolution? Atheism hasn't the boniest leg in all of the holocaust
to stand on.

Well then,

It looks like you have it all figured out.

I was interested in your "thread", but i'm good.

Good luck with that.

IF Oilantaytambo dates back to at least 12,000 yrs. And
as we don't even understand in this day of technology
how the mountainside was carved of blocks. I think we can
easily ( more than many would like to ) assess that these
blocks were carved out of this mountainside, before the flood.

The flood that sheared of the top of the rock hillside. Whereby
the rest of the two rectangular block chasms were once intact.
And the machinery that carved those squares in granite was
obviously lost to the flood. Bye Bye evolution. Hello every
truth that is the Bible.

Ok i'm lost how is prove of a flood in the first place?

a reply to: liejunkie01

It looks like you have it all figured out.

No, I take no credit for the message.

originally posted by: randyvs
IF Oilantaytambo dates back to at least 12,000 yrs. And
as we don't even understand in this day of technology
how the mountainside was carved of blocks. I think we can
easily ( more than many would like to ) assess that these
blocks were carved out of this mountainside, before the flood.

The flood that sheared of the top of the rock hillside. Whereby
the rest of the two rectangular block chasms were once intact.
And the machinery that carved those squares in granite was
obviously lost to the flood. Bye Bye evolution. Hello every
truth that is the Bible.

Ye lost me bud... The "Flood" never happened... Theres no proof of it anywhere, and if it did it was most definitely a local one... not a world wide one that is described in the bible...

And even IF it did... that still doesn't disprove evolution...

You're logic went right out the window with the start of this thread... now you're just struggling to swim to the surface in an imaginary flood

Erm. Not to be a total jerk, but have you by chance had a few too many brewskies today, Randy? It's pretty telling when no one is following your line of thought that maybe your idea here is a bit half baked...

originally posted by: randyvs
IF Oilantaytambo dates back to at least 12,000 yrs. And
as we don't even understand in this day of technology
how the mountainside was carved of blocks. I think we can
easily ( more than many would like to ) assess that these
blocks were carved out of this mountainside, before the flood.

The flood that sheared of the top of the rock hillside. Whereby
the rest of the two rectangular block chasms were once intact.
And the machinery that carved those squares in granite was
obviously lost to the flood. Bye Bye evolution. Hello every
truth that is the Bible.

Lol

What?????

First of all, you make the massive assumption of a "Flood Myth" as being Fact. Then using that "Myth as Fact" as your proof you again make another assumption stating it too as fact. Still not showing how this disproves Evolution.

Let's say a flood really did happen for argument sake. That alone isn't proof of the bible accuracy. Only that perhaps some reference exists for it within the bible.

So if like you say, it was carved before a great flood by some ancient machines and then lost to the flood, this disproves evolution how again???

Even more importantly, how would this prove the Bible entirely true as well???

What about perhaps just some evolved people with better tech than we know of carving these blocks and no flood at all???

a reply to: Akragon

you're just struggling to swim to the surface in an imaginary flood

That's merely a wrong assumption on your part. And ignorant to say the least.
It's obvious that the post you quoted is exactly in line with my premise.
So take that.

a reply to: randyvs

Well its only obvious to you... no one else has a clue what you're on about brother...

a reply to: Nyiah

Not to be a total jerk,

I'll try to help out when I can.
It's only those who I expect to pretend not to understand this
basic communication.

originally posted by: randyvs
a reply to: Nyiah

Not to be a total jerk,

I'll try to help out when I can.

No problemo there
I was serious, though. I've come up with what I thought were awesome theories after a few beers too many. Except in hindsight everyone's o.O looks indicated they were more WTF than anything.