It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: beezzer
Kids make mistakes. This one has no chance to redeem himself.
If the homeowner had held the guy, he would have gone through the legal system and eventually been deported in shame. It may have allowed him a second chance.
From what I read, an unarmed youth was gunned down. Surely a single blast into his legs would have sufficed. Four blasts? That is wrong in my view! That is a deliberate taking of a human life, a young one at that!
P
originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
en.wikipedia.org... comparable case from 1992 where a japanese exchange student accidently went to the wrong house and was shot by the homeowner. the home owner was cleared in this case of criminal charges but did not win in civil court to the tune of 650,000 k in dammages to the boys family.(i think this was pre castle doctrine as i believe that keeps you clear of civil suits) but figured some members may want to see a comparable case and its out come . of note in the linked case above the homeowner seemed very remorseful about the whole event
billingsgazette.com... e91c5e7f2f.html
www.clickorlando.com... 2014 seems to be a bad year to be an exchange student in the usa
I'm kinda shocked by the blood thirsty nature of people on this.
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
originally posted by: BrianFlanders
I don't see the problem, really. People have no business breaking into other people's homes. Was it overkill? Obviously. Was the kid a victim? No. You don't commit a crime against someone else and then get to be the victim when they defend their lives or property.
I've missed where it was EVER established, even after the kid was blown apart with 4 close shotgun blasts, whether he was there to do more than ask for something or trespass? The story mentioned previous break-ins. Did THIS kid do them? Does anyone know? Did the area break-ins come to a stop with the execution of this one? Do we know that either way?
I'm kinda shocked by the blood thirsty nature of people on this.
I'm sorry, that's deliberate murder, not defense...
and the story clearly says the homeowner didn't know who he was..WHAT HIS INTENT WAS...or anything else.
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: Wrabbit2000
I'm kinda shocked by the blood thirsty nature of people on this.
You and me both. Here's what I see happening in many of these discussions, people are pro gun and pro self defense. People's brains trick them into thinking that they have to be pro any sort of self defense with a gun or else their other beliefs are wrong. I'm not saying everyone in this thread is having that issue, but I think a lot of people do.
Regardless of the law, you shouldn't be killing someone because you can. You should only start shooting if you are in REAL danger. Remember the guy with Alzheimer's that got shot when he was trying to enter someone's home?
Now I do agree that there are some very gray areas. People in here commenting that you have no idea the burglars intent are spot on, you really don't. I still don't think that justifies lying in wait with a gun and shooting someone that's rummaging around in your garage. Yeah if you make your presence known and they come at you shoot them.
The only things in my home that I'm willing to shoot someone over are me and my dog (and any young lady unfortunate enough to be in my boudoir). Come after a person or my dog (he's people) and you're done. You can have my stuff, it's replaceable.
I'd like more details. Were the burglaries on occupied homes or were people at work? Did the shooter stage it to look like no one was home?
I sleep with a Glock on the nightstand, have a kitchen gun in a drawer and an AR-15 under the bed. I'm all for defending yourself. Can't support laying in wait for someone and shooting them. Someone breaks into my place I'm going to make the biggest ruckus I can because shooting someone is one of my greatest fears. I know I won't freeze up if the time ever comes, but man I don't want it to ever come to that. I'm paraphrasing an Ayoob quote, "I pray that you never have to use it, but if you do don't miss."
Well, let's think about this rationally and try to read between the lines. How many times has your house been broken into in your entire life?
Jerome Ersland, 59, an Oklahoma City pharmacist at Reliable Discount Pharmacy, defended himself and employees against two armed robbers, who burst into the pharmacy with guns drawn and shooting on May 19, 2009. Jerome Ersland returned fire and hit one of the robbers in the head. That robber, Antwun Parker, collapsed. The second robber escaped out the front door. Ersland followed the second robber out the front door and confirmed that he left the scene. A security camera captured the incident on video. A third suspect, possibly in a getaway car, reached for a shotgun. Ersland aimed his weapon ‘right between his eyes’ and the third suspect fled.
Source
Ersland then returned to the counter and pulled out a Kel-Tec .380 and shot the unconscious, Antwun Parker, offender five more times.
originally posted by: Tidnabnilims
a reply to: HanzHenry
Where did I deny other countries have slavery in their past ? Not seeing them wistfully wishing for those days again though. But yes, I'm sure going back to a time when vigilante justice was the standard and blowing people away for minor rubbish must seem fun to you.
You forgot the whole genocide thing too, thats kinda the worst bit.
originally posted by: Tidnabnilims
a reply to: Meee32
Cool story bro. Your anecdote of a minor infraction will stand as testiment to the need for vigilantes. If only there had been someone who could have put one between the eyes of the evil paint scuffer in your tale, the world would be such a better place for it.
originally posted by: Tidnabnilims
a reply to: Meee32
I dont think I could drip more sarcasm than in my previous post if I tried so I wont.
Did you hear a whooshing sound just then ?
originally posted by: Tidnabnilims
a reply to: Meee32
Are you willing to assault someone for the high crime of their small child scuffing your paint ?
originally posted by: Wrabbit2000
a reply to: BrianFlanders
Okay, I'm going to reply once to cover a couple because the million little factors, what if's, what else's and what for's are nothing but distraction.
I carry a gun. Like millions of other Americans. I'm under laws very similar to what he was bound by when he murdered that kid. You do *NOT* fire on someone who is NOT a threat. No ifs...No ands...No buts. NO exceptions. EVER.