It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A drug dealer and a gang member want the court to rule that the searches of their cellphones after their arrest violated their right to privacy in the digital age.
The Obama administration and California, defending the searches, say cellphones are no different from anything else a person may be carrying when arrested. Police may search those items without a warrant under a line of high court cases reaching back 40 years
Source
Librarians, the news media, defense lawyers and civil liberties groups on the right and left are trying to convince the justices that they should take a broad view of the privacy issues raised when police have unimpeded access to increasingly powerful devices that may contain a wealth of personal data: emails and phone numbers, photographs, information about purchases and political affiliations, books and a gateway to even more material online.
originally posted by: butcherguy
If you have a locked box on your person or in your car, can the police rifle through it without your consent if they have no warrant?
The cell phone is no different than a locked box containing personal information.
Even when information is subpoenaed for a trial, it is only the subpoenaed info that is used in a trial, not all info that a person has in their possession.
This is a very important decision coming up, IMO.
originally posted by: rival
a reply to: Pilgrum
Right now it does take a legal warrant to search a PC.
And it should take a legal warrant to search a cell phone...period.
Likewise it should take a search warrant to listen to private
phone calls.
Right now the government is out of control with unlawful surveillance
and wire-tapping. Wire-tapping laws are in place--the problem is
that they are only being enforced on the general population.
We have a Constitution that expressly prohibits this type of
blanket government surveillance...lets hope we have a
SCOTUS that CAN READ!
originally posted by: VoidHawk
I doubt those who are doing naughty things would be silly enough to keep data on their phones, stupid them if they are!
Personally I dont think anyone should have the right to search anothers phone without very good cause, but lets face it, even if the law said they cant, they still would!
Dont keep sensitive data on your phone or pc!
originally posted by: VoidHawk
I doubt those who are doing naughty things would be silly enough to keep data on their phones, stupid them if they are!
Personally I dont think anyone should have the right to search anothers phone without very good cause, but lets face it, even if the law said they cant, they still would!
effects
ef·fects [ih-fekts]
plural noun
goods; movables; personal property.