It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
SALMON, Idaho (Reuters) - Hundreds of low-level and medium-sized earthquakes have struck central Idaho since last month, puzzling geologists who wonder whether the ruptures portend a much larger temblor to come or are merely the rumblings of a seismic fault previously thought to be dormant.
Such earthquake swarms typically are associated with the movement of molten rock below ground, which geologists credited for the recent quake cluster at Yellowstone National Park, or they are linked to an active fault, he said on Tuesday.
LightSource
Could all this activity be lava moving towards Yellowstone for a larger event?
TrueAmerican
LightSource
Could all this activity be lava moving towards Yellowstone for a larger event?
Yes. Since they've twice now revised the estimated size of the magma chamber under Yellowstone, little did they realize that it actually extends beyond the confines of the earth and solar system, and stretches all the way into oblivion. Therefore, we're all gonna die.edit on Wed Apr 16th 2014 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)
TrueAmerican
When magma breaks rock, it does so in such a way that differentiates itself from tectonic or faulting based quakes. The problem is this is not determined in an instant, and hence the reason for them moving a portable seismic network into the area- to better assess these things. It will probably be a while before there is any determination. But to give you an idea, it took Yellowstone scientists nearly five years to determine that the quake swarm at the lake in 2008 was likely caused by a magmatic intrusion.
Given though that the magma chamber under Yellowstone comes nowhere near 300 km away from the park, where these quakes are occurring in Idaho, I'd sooner believe your dog is an alien, than believe these quakes have anything at all to do with Yellowstone. It's probably just a previously unknown fault acting up, or a new fault extension from the previously known faults that caused seismicity in the past there.
It's possible that it could be resurgent volcanic activity from the ancient, extinct Challis volcanic field, but the chances of that aren't near as good as me winning the Megamillions lottery. So to answer your question in one word: no.edit on Wed Apr 16th 2014 by TrueAmerican because: (no reason given)