It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
CB328
The obvious conclusion is that crime rates are not determined by gun ownership, as gun fanatics are constantly claiming.
The obvious conclusion is that crime rates are not determined by gun ownership, as gun fanatics are constantly claiming.
Its not gun "ownership" as you put it that "reduces crime". Its gun carrying that does
reckless accusations
CB328
reckless accusations
Yeah, because calling the President a muslim, usurper, communist who hates America isn't reckless (and false) accusations, but finding very obvious correlations in factual data is??
CB328
Its not gun "ownership" as you put it that "reduces crime". Its gun carrying that does
Right, so that's why so many of the worst states for violent crime are all conservative?? And how do you explain states that don't have as many gun people but have less crime? (like my state of Washington). It's obvious from the data that crowding, inner-city populations or having a lot of conservatives are the main causes of violent crime.
The ranks in some tables are based on estimates derived from a sample(s). Because of sampling and nonsampling errors associated with the estimates, the ranking of the estimates does not necessarily reflect the correct ranking of the unknown true values. Thus, caution should be used when making inferences or statements about the states' true values based on a ranking of the estimates. As an example, the estimated total (average, percent, ratio, etc.) for State A may be larger than the estimates for all other states. This does not necessarily mean that the true total (average, percent, ratio, etc.) for State A is larger than those for all other states. Such an inference typically depends on --among other factors-- the size of the difference(s) between the estimates in question, and the size of their associated standard errors.
In other tables, the ranks are based on a complete enumeration of the target population, or on complete administrative reporting from the population. In such cases, sampling is not used, and there is no sampling error component in the estimates. Still, care should still be taken when making inferences or statements based on the rankings. The table values may still exhibit nonsampling error originating from such sources as coverage problems (missing units or duplicates), nonresponse, misreporting, and others.
CB328
reckless accusations
Yeah, because calling the President a muslim, usurper, communist who hates America isn't reckless (and false) accusations, but finding very obvious correlations in factual data is??
CB328
I found this table while doing some research about gun violence. Granted this is from several years ago, but should still be useful for analysis since it compares all the states at that time. If you look over this listing what you will find is that there are gun-crazy states with high violent crime rates, and states not known for gun ownership with high and also with low rates of violence.
The obvious conclusion is that crime rates are not determined by gun ownership, as gun fanatics are constantly claiming. It looks to me that there are probably a few different factors for the differences, the most obvious or prevalent ones are population density, and population homogeneity (diversity). Notice that most of the most violent states are very conservative, though there are some conservative states with lower rates as well, so that is probably influenced again by population or maybe education.
www.census.gov...
benrl
MY right to a gun, has nothing to do with me protecting myself from crime.
Its soul purpose as a right, is to protect me from the tyranny of those in power.