It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
3 So Peter went out with the other disciple, and they were going toward the tomb. 4 Both of them were running together, but the other disciple outran Peter and reached the tomb first. 5 And stooping to look in, he saw the linen cloths lying there, but he did not go in. 6 Then Simon Peter came, following him, and went into the tomb. He saw the linen cloths lying there, 7 and the face cloth, which had been on Jesus' head, not lying with the linen cloths but folded up in a place by itself. 8 Then the other disciple, who had reached the tomb first, also went in, and he saw and believed;
The authenticity of the shroud of Turin has no bearing on my faith whatsoever.
windword
reply to post by DeadSeraph
The authenticity of the shroud of Turin has no bearing on my faith whatsoever.
And yet, the title of your thread: Scientists Say Shroud of Turin Shows Jesus Was Crucified in 'Very Painful' Position
So what's that all about, if not to emphasize the brutality of Roman crucifixion and to fixate on the barbaric method of the torture and the muse about the pain that Jesus felt while dying?
reply to post by Aleister
I don't think any of the reenactors scourge their skin until it's falling off
This thread is in Conspiracies in Religion, not Breaking News, where you must use the breaking news article title in the title of your thread.
The emphasis in this thread is about Christians focusing on the method of torture and the amount of pain that we can imagine that Jesus felt while dying. Not on whether the Shroud is real.
This isn't new news, it's old news revitalized for the Easter Season when Christians love to fantasize about the pain and barbaric methods by which Jesus could possibly have been tortured and killed by the Romans, and finding proof for their fascination.
My reply to you, and my observation of how Christians love to talk about the ways and means of the barbaric torture and the horror of the supposed crucifixion of Jesus, at Easter time like clockwork every year blah blah blah etc etc etc ...
As Borrini told the New Scientist, this new crucifixion position would have been much more painful than the "T" shaped crucifixion, as being hung with one's arms above their head makes it very difficult to breathe. The scientists further suggested that one hung in a "Y" shape would likely die from asphyxiation
The authenticity of the shroud of Turin has no bearing on my faith whatsoever. Scientists could announce tomorrow that the whole thing is a fake and it wouldn't impact me one iota. I find it to be an interesting curiosity, but it has little to do with what I base my faith on.
Jordan River
Isn't the y significant when compared to the peace sign. I'm just saying, i think it isnt coincidence. Either way it dont matter
DeadSeraph
Danbones
me, I'm not so sure about this whole cross deal as you might notice if you go to my siggy thread
i think the cross as it is expressed in christianity and all the other religions where saviors were hung on crosses
kind of throws a wrench into the whole shroud of turin being Jesus idea
16 saviors hung on crosses
infidels.org...
I don't really want to get into a debate on the historicity of Jesus since I've done that a million times here. I'm sure this sort of comment will pop up a lot in this thread, and that's to be expected given the subject. But I do have a couple questions for you:
-Where are all the other crucified saviors from other religions? Can you provide a reliable source? I've looked into this accusation and it appears to be a completely bogus claim. Your source above is not at all neutral, or even remotely scholarly.
-Are you aware that crucifixion actually happened and the romans were famous for it? Are you also aware they crucified Christians by their own admission? One final thing to consider: Crucifixion didn't become a method of execution until around 600BC. How can there be all these ancient religions with crucified saviors when the practice didn't even exist until 600BC?edit on 8-4-2014 by DeadSeraph because: (no reason given)