It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Zcustosmorum
Screw the quotation marks, not even the point, the fact is he said it
Spiro
Zcustosmorum
Screw the quotation marks, not even the point, the fact is he said it
Or the fact that he ASKED it?
Big difference.
Cheers
Spiro
Spiro
The way I perceive what you are saying is that if there is not enough detail in the OP then all should attack the messenger? I'm not saying you are directly, but this is what I am perceiving
Also worth noting here before anyone starts to attack me. The OP is asking .... COULD this be the " Smoking Gun "? He's not claiming it is though a good few members seem to think otherwise.
How does it feel to be criticized more on how you write, then what you wrote about?
And you wrote about someone seeing a UFO, on a conspiracy site, started mainly for UFO's!
The irony of this is making my head spin.
Zcustosmorum
Pffft, regardless,
Soylent Green Is People
Well, when I asked him how it was a smoking gun (i.e., I questioned what evidence he had that this sighting was something special), he came back and told me he was being sarcastic about the smoking gun.
So then I asked him again what he felt was special about the sighting, plus I questioned what his phrase "Time to kill the thread and the messenger" had to do with the report. Why would he say that?
I simply want to know: "what does the OP feel is special about this sighting". He feels this sighting of strange lights is worth a thread, and worth talking about "self appointed skeptics" and "forbidden subjects", and I just want to know how he thinks "forbidden subjects" plays in to this particular report of strange lights.
I don't think that is asking too much.
Soylent Green Is People
Telos
Zcustosmorum
Smoking gun? Don't make me laugh, it's an opinion over something that he seen, it still doesn't automatically mean aliens
HELLO!!!!
Is got quotation marks which means doesn't really mean is the smoking gun. Have you heard about sarcasm?
Then I don't understand the point of this thread. What are you trying to say?
I understand it is an article about a sighting, but your inflammatory language made it seem you were approaching it from another angle (your words about "self-appointed debunkers" and "time to kill the tread and the messenger" and "forbidden subjects").
So do you or don't you feel this sighting is clear evidence (a smoking gun) as something otherworldy?
edit on 4/3/2014 by Soylent Green Is People because: (no reason given)
Unity_99
Well, there is that saying, if they let you see them, more occurred than the sighting. There was missing time....
but proof that we've been visited (if it was the case) wil never be proved.
Mianeye
reply to post by Telos
Is this the "smoking gun" or another saga to be debunked by the self appointed debunkers that lurk in this site in abundance.
No it's not the "smoking gun", it's just interesting but he really dosn't add anything else but more questions.
Don't pick on the debunkers, they are very usefull to this siteedit on 3-4-2014 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)
Well, this thread will go in to 10 pages of debating the " smoking gun " phrase and not that of the sighting in question
game over man
Glad to see some discussion of the irrational debunkers tearing apart OP's because they phrased something not to their liking.
Thank you for sharing this.
Point noted he doesn't rule out ET visitation.
game over man
Glad to see some discussion of the irrational debunkers tearing apart OP's because they phrased something not to their liking.
Thank you for sharing this.
Point noted he doesn't rule out ET visitation.