It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Amethyst
Basically the reasons you state are SELFISH ones. If a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she should keep her legs closed, 'cause contraceptives are not 100% effective!
Originally posted by lmgnyc
But rigid morals aside, there are valid reasons for keeping abortion legal. There are too many exceptions--medical reasons, rape, incest, severe birth defects--that make the need to terminate a pregnancy necessary. Yes, there are people that opt to terminate pregnancies for reasons that some may not deem valid, but it is not our place to dictate how another person should live their life. I'm sure that you would strongly object to rules that restricted your freedoms, like being told that you weren't allowed to have more than one child or weren't allowed to go to church. Being forced to bear children is the same deal--your solution to live your life without sex doesn't really cut it for most people.
Originally posted by lmgnyc
What about women who shouldn't have children--like women who are severely diabetic who will die because of the stress that child bearing will but on their kidneys? Even if married, do you believe that they should never have sex even using contraception for fear of getting accidentally pregnant? Do you honestly believe that these women should live their entire lives without having sex? And if these women should accidently get pregnant because the contraception fails, do you think that they should carry to term, even though it will most definitely kill them in the process (and potentially the fetus also)..or is that just her punishment for not "keeping her legs closed"?
Sorry to set your bible on fire, but you are in the small minority of the world that only has sex for procreative purposes. And I'm not saying that it isn't your right--go live your life as you wish, but the majority of the world, thank goodness, doesn't only have sex for the purpose of making babies. I couldn't even imagine how bad the overpopulation problem would be if that was the case.
But rigid morals aside, there are valid reasons for keeping abortion legal. There are too many exceptions--medical reasons, rape, incest, severe birth defects--that make the need to terminate a pregnancy necessary. Yes, there are people that opt to terminate pregnancies for reasons that some may not deem valid, but it is not our place to dictate how another person should live their life. I'm sure that you would strongly object to rules that restricted your freedoms, like being told that you weren't allowed to have more than one child or weren't allowed to go to church. Being forced to bear children is the same deal--your solution to live your life without sex doesn't really cut it for most people.
But this aside, abortions need to be legal to everyone because otherwise, someone like a judge would decide who gets an abortion and who doesn't, and that just isn't a good idea. A woman shouldn't have to file a motion to determine whether or not she is worthy of terminating her pregnancy, especially in such a time-sensitive situation. It should be left up to the woman to decide what to do with her body.
Originally posted by KrazyJethro
Originally posted by curme
I'm just glad I'm a guy, and there isn't all of this fuss over my appendix!
(I'm glad too), but I don't think it really changes much in the abortion debate. I certainly think the removal of men's rights in abortion was either a result of men's disinterest in responsibility, or, more likely, a cause of men's disinterest in responsibility.
Absent fathers are a serious problem too.
Originally posted by Mahree
]This is definitely a problem for men also. The man is the father of this child and should have a say in whether the child lives or dies. Men cannot ignore the responsibility just because the baby is not inside their body.
Originally posted by intrepid
Originally posted by Mahree
]This is definitely a problem for men also. The man is the father of this child and should have a say in whether the child lives or dies. Men cannot ignore the responsibility just because the baby is not inside their body.
Should? Yes but the pro choisers would say that the father has NO opinion because it isn't his body in question. What a conundrum.
Originally posted by Psychoses
Posted by Amethyst
A child is not part of the mother's body.
Of course they feel bad about it, but what is better, the child to suffer a childhood and possible lifetime of misery, or nothing at all?
Amethyst, as a mother I know that you would never want your child to suffer. If the only way you could guarantee that your child would not suffer because of the circumstances you were in was to abort, what would your decision be?
scientifically there is absolutely no question whatsoever that the immediate product of fertilization is a newly existing human being. A human zygote is a human being. It is NOT a "potential" or a "possible" human being.
Source
Originally posted by Amethyst
Autonomy. Riiggght. If a woman gets pregnant by screwing around, hey, you play, you pay.
The definition of "health" is pretty broad. Should I have aborted my son because I might get a gray hair (which I got a year later)? You know, I was tired my whole pregnancy and was diagnosed with gestational diabetes. But you know what? He is more than worth it!
Basically the reasons you state are SELFISH ones. If a woman doesn't want to get pregnant she should keep her legs closed, 'cause contraceptives are not 100% effective!
The woman and the unborn child are equally valuable.
It's a woman's choice whether or not to have sex. But if sex results in the conception of another human, it's a different ballgame. She has the moral obligation to carry that child to term. Considering that a woman's body was DESIGNED to carry an unborn child, I find it hard to believe that there are all these cases of pregnancy endangering the mother's life. The only one I can think of is ectopic pregnancy--the child has to come out. He or she will die, yes, but he or she would die if the tube burst and the mother died as a result.
Other than that, a good doctor would try to save both mother AND baby. Pregnancy complications in second/third trimester? You don't have to kill the child--just induce labor or do a C-section. The baby has to come out, but there's no good reason to kill him or her!
Originally posted by Mahree
This is definitely a problem for men also. The man is the father of this child and should have a say in whether the child lives or dies. Men cannot ignore the responsibility just because the baby is not inside their body.
Originally posted by edsinger
So just what is your definition of poverty? In the US? In the world?
Now, the United States gives more money and food to the world than any other country..........what about that?
So because the child is born into poverty in the US means that it should be murdered?
I would argue that the poor in the United States has a totally different meaning that say the poor in India? Brazil? China? African nations?
See it is how you and I would define poverty. The poverty line in the US would be considered very rich in some countries.
But that is not what we are discussing here Deep, so you say that to kill the child is best for the child in the long run?
Here in the US many a rich person has started VERY poor. It is called opportunity, and it gets not better than the US.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
You plan to support all those starving babies, ed? You gonna support them and their moms from your paycheck? you gonna take care of em?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_ElfTo correct your most incorrect "arguement" against abortion, plants can live without human care, so can animals, they can live independantly of us. Look outside your window. (provided you are not a total conservative, and havent poisoned your land to where nothing will grow).
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_ElfYou support death penalty and war, both stop human heartbeats. This is very hypocritical.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_ElfTake the death penalty. Its funny how conservatives support the state sanctioned death of a fully grown human. Yet reject a measure to prevent their birth in the first place. Shows what a bunch of control freak sadists conservatives are.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_ElfYou are yet to make any logical sustainable argument against abortion. You have no working knowldge of the female body, do you? if you did, youd know a fetus is just that: a fetus. It is a collection of tissue that is a potential human, but not a human. Many times, a womans body will abort the fetus itself, and reabsorp the tissue for nutrients. because at that stage, its little mroe than a growth. Its not a life. Not by scientific standards.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_ElfAnd being a male, as far as Im concerned, abortion is none of your business, period. Since its not your body that has to carry the fetus for 9 months. Unless youre volunteering your body as a surrogate for aborted fetuses, I strongly suggest to you and your conservative pals to get into a cause that is your business. A womans body is not.
Originally posted by riley
Problem is there are many women who are told to get abortions from would be fathers.. the very fact that the role of fathers is usually left out of this debate shows women are left with sole responsibilty. How many women are coerced? Alot. I rarely see anyone mention these 'evil' men that do the coersion that results in abortion though.. are they excempt from moral judgement?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
You plan to support all those starving babies, ed? You gonna support them and their moms from your paycheck? you gonna take care of em?
And being a male, as far as I�m concerned, abortion is none of your business, period. Since its not your body that has to carry the fetus for 9 months. Unless youre volunteering your body as a surrogate for aborted fetuses, I strongly suggest to you and your conservative pals to get into a cause that is your business.
A woman�s body is not.
Originally posted by edsinger
Now this is something to ponder and Western nations wonder why they will soon be in the minority? This is sad as we are killing ourselves out deliberately.