It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BAGHDAD (AP) — A contentious draft law being considered in Iraq could open the door to girls as young as nine getting married and would require wives to submit to sex on their husband's whim, provoking outrage from rights activists and many Iraqis who see it as a step backward for women's rights.
The measure, aimed at creating different laws for Iraq's majority Shiite population, could further fray the country's divisions amid some of the worst bloodshed since the sectarian fighting that nearly ripped the country apart after the U.S.-led invasion. It also comes as more and more children under 18 get married in the country.
"That law represents a crime against humanity and childhood," prominent Iraqi human rights activist Hana Adwar told The Associated Press. "Married underage girls are subjected to physical and psychological suffering.
Iraqi law now sets the legal age for marriage at 18 without parental approval. Girls as young as 15 can be married only with a guardian's approval.
The proposed new measure, known as the Jaafari Personal Status Law, is based on the principles of a Shiite school of religious law founded by Jaafar al-Sadiq, the sixth Shiite imam. Iraq's Justice Ministry late last year introduced the draft measure to the Cabinet, which approved it last month despite strong opposition by rights groups and activists.
The draft law does not set a minimum age for marriage. Instead, it mentions an age in a section on divorce, setting rules for divorces of girls who have reached the age of 9 years in the lunar Islamic calendar.It also says that's the age girls reach puberty. Since the Islamic calendar year is 10 or 11 days shorter than the Gregorian calendar, that would be the equivalent of 8 years and 8 months old. The bill makes the father the only parent with the right to accept or refuse the marriage proposal.
who see it as a step backward for women's rights.
Trueman
reply to post by Spider879
I was reading about that about 2 days ago. It's just sick in the worse way. No excuses.
Don't want to see posts telling me that I have to respect it because "it's another culture".
Don't want to read downplaying posts showing examples of primitive behavior in other countries like USA.edit on 16-3-2014 by Trueman because: (no reason given)
jazz10
The only way I can imagine any religious people to accept this as a law is if both of those getting married are of the same age.
Not a young girl and someone grave dodging because that is obviously an attempt to hide paedophilia by dressing it up as something else.
so if some deem it necessary to do so, don't forget the part of samr ages.
Other than that because of immaturity I wouldn't allow it, kids been kids they will have a divorce list the length of their arms
So......No.
Spider879
jazz10
The only way I can imagine any religious people to accept this as a law is if both of those getting married are of the same age.
Not a young girl and someone grave dodging because that is obviously an attempt to hide paedophilia by dressing it up as something else.
so if some deem it necessary to do so, don't forget the part of samr ages.
Other than that because of immaturity I wouldn't allow it, kids been kids they will have a divorce list the length of their arms
So......No.
But that's the problem Jazz, this law will make it legal for bearded smelly old farts to marry 8 yr ols, and don't get me wrong the set back for women is as bad as it gets,but at-least she would theoretically be able to stab her rapist husband through the heart with a dull knife,but what chance does an 8yr old have.
andy1972
Spider879
jazz10
The only way I can imagine any religious people to accept this as a law is if both of those getting married are of the same age.
Not a young girl and someone grave dodging because that is obviously an attempt to hide paedophilia by dressing it up as something else.
so if some deem it necessary to do so, don't forget the part of samr ages.
Other than that because of immaturity I wouldn't allow it, kids been kids they will have a divorce list the length of their arms
So......No.
But that's the problem Jazz, this law will make it legal for bearded smelly old farts to marry 8 yr ols, and don't get me wrong the set back for women is as bad as it gets,but at-least she would theoretically be able to stab her rapist husband through the heart with a dull knife,but what chance does an 8yr old have.
Well, In Afghanistan raping 10 year old dancing boys is a national sport in within the police force and marrying 8 year old girls to grandfathers is the norm..
In Iraq they've still got it good..edit on AM7Sun20141972 by andy1972 because: (no reason given)
andy1972
Iraq is now a democratic country thanks to the U.S..now they can vote for shi+ like this when they want.
You can take the arab out of the middle ages, but not the middle ages out of the arab..
]n the whole, the American people can say we did a noble thing," he tells FRONTLINE. "… We put the Iraqis on the right path, politically, to a better political future, and they now have got, certainly, the right plans...
en.wikipedia.org...
Though subject to the authority of the CPA administrator Paul Bremer, the council had several key powers of its own. Their duties included appointing representatives to the United Nations, appointing interim ministers to Iraq's vacant cabinet positions, and drafting a temporary constitution, the Transitional Administrative Law (TAL). The TAL spelled out the provisions which were to govern the Iraqi Interim Government, and the timeline for holding elections to a National Assembly, drafting of a permanent constitution to be voted on by the Iraqi people, and elections to a permanent government.
Despite having to answer to the CPA, different factions took on controversial stands. Religious hardliners won a solid victory when Directive 137 was passed on December 29, 2003. Passed by the council in less than 15 minutes, it replaced Iraq's former secular family law code with Shari'a family law. This move met with wide protest among many Iraqi women fearful of how it will affect their freedom to make their own decisions about marriage, divorce, alimony, and many other issues where Iraq used to be a leader in the Arab world for women's rights. Other legislation passed by the council included declaring the day that Baghdad fell to be a national holiday, voting to establish a tribunal to try former government leaders, and banning television stations which are deemed to be supportive of the resistance.
Trueman
reply to post by Spider879
I was reading about that about 2 days ago. It's just sick in the worse way. No excuses.
Don't want to see posts telling me that I have to respect it because "it's another culture".
Don't want to read downplaying posts showing examples of primitive behavior in other countries like USA.edit on 16-3-2014 by Trueman because: (no reason given)
en.wikipedia.org...
There is an ongoing problem with sexual assault in the U.S. military which has received extensive media coverage in the past several years. The Department of Defense estimates there are about 19,000 sexual assaults in the military per year but according to the latest Pentagon statistics (2013), only 1,108 troops filed for an investigation during the most recent yearly reporting period and during that period, only 575 cases were processed. No outside audit has been conducted of the military's numbers. Of the cases processed, only 96 went to court-martial.[1] Another investigation found that only one in five females and one in 15 males in the United States Air Force would report having been sexually assaulted by service members.[2]
Incidents which have been publicized include the Tailhook scandal in 1991, the Aberdeen scandal in 1996 and the 2003 US Air Force Academy sexual assault scandal. In an attempt to deal with this problem the Defense Department has issued the Department of Defense Sexual Assault Response policy. A provision in the fiscal 2004 National Defense Authorization Act required investigation and reporting regarding sexual harassment and assault at the United States military academies. A report was published in the New York Times magazine in March, 2007 which surveyed women soldiers' experience in the Iraq War showing significant incidence of post traumatic stress syndrome resulting from the combination of combat stress and sexual assault.[3] 15% of female veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan who have visited a VA facility have screened positive for military sexual trauma.[4]
Danbones
reply to post by andy1972
I agree
thats my problem with the US led invasion
eta "barbaridad" lol good one
edit on Sunam3b20143America/Chicago13 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
edit on Sunam3b20143America/Chicago35 by Danbones because: (no reason given)
mysterioustranger
reply to post by Spider879
Wouldn't be for me. I don't live n that society. When we disagree its not about "their culture" and don't wanna hear it...we are citing OUR culture used to decry theirs. That's a two-sided coin. You support yours but don't support theirs?
I am wondering though...if we are to accept its in their culture ok....but what does the average Iraqi living and raised in that culture...feel about this?
If the world were to live in harmony with each other as we've been trying to all along...arent we supposed to accept each other and their cultures...no matter how different... so we can?
edit on 09-22-2013 by mysterioustranger because: (no reason given)