It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It was an elusive planet that for 200 years appeared to explain Uranus's wobbly orbit. And there was the sister sun theorized to be near our solar system that caused asteroids to swerve toward Earth.
There is just one problem: neither "Planet X" nor "Nemesis" ever existed, researchers now say.....
"The outer solar system probably does not contain a large gas giant planet ("Planet X"), or a small, companion star ("Nemesis")," concluded University of Pennsylvania astronomer Kevin Luhman, who directed the study using NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) telescope.
The results were published in the most recent edition of The Astrophysical Journal.
Annunak1
reply to post by DJW001
Scientists think they know it all but they don't know $*
Annunak1
reply to post by DJW001
Just because people say something does not exist don't mean that it's true.
Some things just can not be proven by these man made researches. Scientists think they know it all but they don't know $*
hexillion
Annunak1
reply to post by DJW001
Scientists think they know it all but they don't know $*
They know the math for the gravity which an additional planet would impart on it's neighbours.
You don't. Therefor you get to be told. Just the same as every other piece of information from every other field of science, which you don't have a prejudice towards.
DJW001
Annunak1
reply to post by DJW001
Just because people say something does not exist don't mean that it's true.
Some things just can not be proven by these man made researches. Scientists think they know it all but they don't know $*
I should have known actual facts would not settle anything.
"The outer solar system probably does not contain a large gas giant planet ("Planet X"), or a small, companion star ("Nemesis")," concluded University of Pennsylvania astronomer Kevin Luhman, who directed the study using NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) telescope.
Catacomb
DJW001
Annunak1
reply to post by DJW001
Just because people say something does not exist don't mean that it's true.
Some things just can not be proven by these man made researches. Scientists think they know it all but they don't know $*
I should have known actual facts would not settle anything.
What fact, he says this:
"The outer solar system probably does not contain a large gas giant planet ("Planet X"), or a small, companion star ("Nemesis")," concluded University of Pennsylvania astronomer Kevin Luhman, who directed the study using NASA's Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) telescope.
Probably...how is that fact?
Annunak1
Like i said. Some things just can't be proven with man made laws. Science say this is fact right now. in a few years new facts arise and they change their whole stance on the subject. Therefore science is never factual because there are always new facts that are not discovered yet.
Annunak1Therefore science is never factual because there are always new facts that are not discovered yet.
The OP is just copying some ish some other guy found out. Just because they did the math don't mean it's correct.
edit on 16-3-2014 by Annunak1 because: (no reason given)
Oh and spaceships have cloaking devices so that's why we can't see them
edit on 16-3-2014 by Annunak1 because: (no reason given)
Annunak1
reply to post by DJW001
The fact only that they used a device created by NASA smells like BS. NASA is and always will be a big fat liar when it comes to space studies. They didn't prove crap. They just made a statement based on their biased research. You can say all you want but i am not buying a thing that is linked with NASA
DJW001
reply to post by Annunak1
The OP is just copying some ish some other guy found out. Just because they did the math don't mean it's correct.
edit on 16-3-2014 by Annunak1 because: (no reason given)
I am not "just copying some guy." I am citing research that has appeared in a peer reviewed journal. The peer review process means that other researchers have checked his math. This greatly increases the odds that it is correct, and his conclusions valid. Admittedly, absence of evidence is not necessarily evidence of absence, but there are what are technically known as "constraints." If there are other bodies out there, they must have a certain maximum mass and/or minimum distance.
Oh and spaceships have cloaking devices so that's why we can't see them
edit on 16-3-2014 by Annunak1 because: (no reason given)
How did you determine this "fact?"
Trueman
reply to post by DJW001
Many years ago, during a gathering with what you would call "mystic people" in Peru, I heard an interesting theory.
They told me that planet is in a parallel dimension, that would make it impossible to spot by scientists. It eventually would pass close to Earth, to retrieve all the people that couldn't reach a higher state of conscience. That world will be another opportunity to progress for them. After that "clean up", Earth will got to a higher dimension.
No due date was given.