It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Waterdog1
Sremmos80
This was a protest
Looked to me like some retard making a lame Youtube video.
But you're right, people are free in amerika to make fools of themselves and go public with it
stargatetravels
Regarding the video, if this is a response by an ATS member to the crazies in the other flag thread, then its genius and bravo.
cuckooold
Does allowing the flag to be used to pick up dog poop equate to free speech, or should he be shot execution style for picking up dog poop with said flag?
Sremmos80
reply to post by onthedownlow
So if it were a different flag you would have no problem? That just since this item holds special value to you that it needs to share that value to others?
Why is this not a freedom of speech? They are expressing their views of what the flag stands for and they have every right to show it in the way they want.
That is what the flag stands for... Freedom
Sremmos80
They are exercising a right... But I guess that is considered retarded now a days...
txinfidel
reply to post by Sremmos80
I don't remember anyone in this thread stating this guy didn't have the right to do what he did except for the people who are in support of making a mockery out of the US flag, yes thats you and dozens of others.
No one else stated such a thing. But here we go again into liberal la la land.
I can't hear you. I can't hear you.I can't hear you.I can't hear you.I can't hear you.I can't hear you.I can't hear you.I can't hear you.
I suppose were all supposed to agree with you then it is acceptable. Otherwise under your definition of freedom of speech whatever is not agreeable with you is not freedom of speech.
You can't have it both ways.edit on 11-3-2014 by txinfidel because: (no reason given)
Waterdog1
Sremmos80
They are exercising a right... But I guess that is considered retarded now a days...
Okay, seeing how easily offended you were by me exercising my right to free speech.
I apologize,
Sremmos80
I merely asked you to explain what was "retarded" about what they were doing.
Waterdog1
Sremmos80
I merely asked you to explain what was "retarded" about what they were doing.
You're right, and again, I'm sorry I called the creator of such obvious Cinematic brilliance a retard.
Again my apologies