Beijing-bound MAS plane carrying 239 people missing as of 20 mins ago.

I couldn't help noticing that the search areas are getting closer and closer to the Naval Communication Station Harold E. Holt on the northwest cape of Australia. That's a rather sensitive and valuable asset to the U.S. The latest search area is only 700 miles west of that facility. Also I found this interesting fact in a Wikipedia article regarding interference from the Harold E. Holt facility and at least 2 Quantas flights in 2008.

Aircraft Interference Controversy

On 7 October 2008, Qantas Flight 72 made an emergency landing at Learmonth airport near the town of Exmouth, Western Australia following an inflight accident featuring a pair of sudden uncommanded pitch-down manoeuvres that resulted in serious injuries to many of the occupants.[11][12][13][14][15] The Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) identified in a preliminary report that a fault occurred within the Number 1 Air Data Inertial Reference Unit (ADIRU) and is the "likely origin of the event". The ADIRU — one of three such devices on the aircraft — began to supply incorrect data to the other aircraft systems.[14][16] The ATSB's continuing accident investigation will include assessment of speculation that possible interference from Harold E. Holt facility or passenger personal electronic devices could have been involved, although based on initial analysis, the Bureau believes these are unlikely to have been of any impact.[14][17][18] On 27 December 2008, another aircraft, Qantas Flight 71, also had a malfunction in its ADIRU. The incident again fuelled media speculation regarding the significance of the Harold E. Holt facility, with the Australian and International Pilots Association calling for commercial aircraft to be barred from the area as a precaution until the events are better understood,[19][20] while the manager of the facility has claimed that it is "highly, highly unlikely" that any interference has been caused.

en.wikipedia.org...-21


www.bangaloreaviation.com...

Naval Communications Station Harold E. Holt


If the U.S. is responsible for the disappearance of MH370, don't expect them to admit it.

reply to post by Mikeultra


And how did the communication station do it? There's no direct evidence they played a role in the Qantas fights, but both of them were flying close to the station at the time.

There are no communications stations near where MH370 went missing, so how did they reach out and only hit that plane and no others?

Zaphod58
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

And how did the communication station do it? There's no direct evidence they played a role in the Qantas fights, but both of them were flying close to the station at the time.

There are no communications stations near where MH370 went missing, so how did they reach out and only hit that plane and no others?

I'm not saying they did it with malice. If MH370 did fly south as the Immarsat liars say it did, then it may have over flown this facility and received interference from it causing a crash. Or it may have been considered a threat and fighters were scrambled and shot it down. Read the last line in the quote from Wikipedia. Of course the manager is going to deny his facility caused the interference with the Quantus flights. The Quantus pilots didn't just make this story up.

reply to post by Mikeultra


It wasn't just the manager. The AAIB also found no evidence outside interference could have caused it. No one has ever said the pilots made it up.

MH370 would have had to make it that far. There's no evidence they overflew or even got near the site.

reply to post by Mikeultra

Immarsat liars say it did

Inmarsat is probably the only truth in this situation. Maybe aliens will abduct the next flight out.

I just found this article that states Australia has taken over the Harold E. Holt Naval Communications Station from the U.S. as of 1992.

The Naval Communication Station Harold E. Holt, established by the U.S. in the 1960s, uses very low frequency transmissions to relay communications between Australian and American submarines. The U.S. Navy left the base in 1992 and it is now owned by the Australian Department of Defence. Boeing Australia Ltd., which operates and maintains the base for the Australian government, referred a call for comment to the defense department. Defense officials in Canberra didn't immediately respond to an e-mailed request for comment.

www.bloomberg.com...

If airlines are telling passengers to turn off certain electronic gizmos they may have on board for the safety of the aircraft, why is it so outlandish to think that the Naval Communications Station could affect aircraft electronics? Also notice that Boeing Australia Ltd. operates and maintains the base for the Australian government!

reply to post by Mikeultra


very good mike,, now one last clue too tye it all into perspective,,,should be relatively easy.

BobAthome
reply to post by Mikeultra

 

very good mike,, now one last clue too tye it all into perspective,,,should be relatively easy.

So you're saying this MH370 story is a hoax? I agree with you.

reply to post by Mikeultra


WT??? Hold Up! Wait a minute...

Sheesha...he's providing you with a document from the last century?

What do you "see" in this document?

Have to admit I am very confused, but what kind of evidence is this? Scanned? WT?

Thanks!

Mikeultra
I couldn't help noticing that the search areas are getting closer and closer to the Naval Communication Station Harold E. Holt on the northwest cape of Australia. That's a rather sensitive and valuable asset to the U.S. The latest search area is only 700 miles west of that facility. Also I found this interesting fact in a Wikipedia article regarding interference from the Harold E. Holt facility and at least 2 Quantas flights in 2008.

While I don't think the naval station had anything to do with mh370 I can attest to thee "stations" playing havoc with the autopilot. Years ago I was 150nm from Pine Gap, fat dumb and happy when my aircraft decided to bank 30 degrees and turn left, uncommanded. A week later on the same route it happened to a friend in the same spot.

reply to post by BurningSpearess


The Eldridge is the destroyer used in the Philadelphia Experiment. So this post means one of two things. Either another Philadelphia Experiment, this time using a commercial 777 (yeah right), or, it's a hoax since so many people believe that the Eldridge story is a hoax (especially considering she was sold to Greece after the US Navy retired her).

reply to post by BobAthome

Are you saying that the mainly urban myth based account of the Philadelphia experiment based VERY loosely on events that took place some 70 years ago is responsible for the disappearance of MH370?

reply to post by Zaphod58


Thanks for clearing that up!

Maybe it's my ignorance, or a generation gap...

I've heard of that experiment, but am not that familiar with it...Didn't know what to make of the random scam scan...

Search for MH370 BB in progress!!!

The underwater search is normally in an area where the plane most likely entered the water, said Houston.

But in this particular case, the last known position was a long way from where the aircraft appeared to have gone, he added.

I'm not investigator, nor am I even intelligent to a certain extent...
So maybe it's just me as I suspect...
But how can a Flight appear to be a "long way" from its last known position???


More importantly if they had such great intel that the could confirm it "ended" in the Indian Ocean why has it taken so long to search underwater for the BB???
5 days left and then they decide, a good 15 days after knowing where it should be???

They never wanted to recover the BB, IMO!!!

The search area is being constantly adjusted based on continuing groundbreaking and multi-disciplinary technical analysis of satellite communications and aircraft performance, passed from the international air crash investigative team, said Houston, the retired air chief marshal.

...
"Bull we have been force feeding the masses for nearly a month!!!"!!!


Peace MH370 xxx

reply to post by BurningSpearess


I don't know, I think Bob is taking the proverbial...

Heh.

Mikeultra
Also notice that Boeing Australia Ltd. operates and maintains the base for the Australian government!]

Just going to put it out there, but companies like Boeing and Lockheed Martin have their fingers in many international defense and space pies. It's nothing new. Nor surprising.

PS: Heh, base called Harold Holt. Amusing. You see, our Prime Minister Holt back in the 60s went out for a swim in the sea and never came back. His body never found and a conspiracy in itself. (for the time, ie cold war)

Listening to the aviation analysts on CNN while on the pc. It sounded like a Monty Python movie! Who is this Richard Quest? His accent is all over the place, sometimes he lays it on really thick. They are all joking about this now. And then I watched this video which caused me to be even more suspicious about this being real or not. Read the comments after the video. It's almost unanimous that people think it's a fake CNN propaganda program. Watch the video and look at the body language and what is said.


EDIT: You know the saying about considering the source of your information? Well I did a quick search on Richard Quest, and found this. CAUTION: Might be disturbing, yet it lets you know who is spinning this tall tale. Is he credible? I think not!
nypost.com...

reply to post by Mikeultra


A few years ago, the NY Post posted a story of RQ's arrest.

I watched the video...but the thing is, the girlfriend has lost so much weight (in her face, anyway) since the plane vanished. This makes me think she's been too worried to eat. (Tonight on CNN, she said she thinks the passengers are alive and that the Malaysians are hiding something.) Admittedly, a gaunt face could be chalked up to many other things. But how to explain the Asian families? Wouldn't that be a huge "Wag the Dog?" Wouldn't someone eventually talk?

That said, I would believe anything about 370. Whether or not it was real, the story around it is becoming mythic.

Meanwhile, the search continues. 13 planes. 11 ships. And a lot of deep water.

reply to post by Mikeultra


Now that story is a doozy, as my granny would have said.

reply to post by robbon2004


THE OUTBACK OF aUSTRALIA PERHAPS ????