It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Griff
reply to post by tep200377
Wow. Didn't know we had to run things by you first before we could ask a question.
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
Since I have sold pressure washers at work, I get that water can cut '"STUFF" line. And I am no troll. What am I trolling for? Please tell me because I don't even know?
There is a huge, size difference here too. Not to mention liquid versus solids.
Originally posted by tep200377
My thoughts is that you just troll around. There are over 100 posts about this OP. Why make one more?
To answer your question with another : How can water cut trough steel ?
science.howstuffworks.com...
Because water should be less solid than aluminium, doesn't it?? OMG ?!?
Google it before you make a post please ..
[edit on 20-11-2007 by tep200377]
[edit on 20-11-2007 by tep200377]
Originally posted by Blue_Jay33
When you watch the second plane hit and go through it so easily, it just doesn't seem possible. I know some people will say kinetic energy did it.
dont make me laugh you cant compare the two [edit on 20-11-2007 by h2owater]
Originally posted by jtma508
A far more intersting question is how did they get the plane to fly so fast at such a low altitude? The turbofans are not designed to fly fast at low altitudes. They're designed for the thinner air at their cruise altitudes (in the 30's). At low altitude the higher density air can't pass through the compressor blades very fast and they end up acting like to 50 sq ft barn doors.
Originally posted by jtma508
The turbofans are not designed to fly fast at low altitudes. They're designed for the thinner air at their cruise altitudes (in the 30's). At low altitude the higher density air can't pass through the compressor blades very fast and they end up acting like to 50 sq ft barn doors.
Originally posted by Haroki
That Q was raised here a while ago. A video was posted of a guy doing 350 kts (about 450 mph?) at 125 ft above sea level, and then pulling up into a 2g climb.
There's no problem.
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by Haroki
That Q was raised here a while ago. A video was posted of a guy doing 350 kts (about 450 mph?) at 125 ft above sea level, and then pulling up into a 2g climb.
There's no problem.
I'm not disputing you but was he in a 757 when he did this? I'm not an aviation expert so I have no idea either way.
Originally posted by tep200377
And why is that? Why cant i compare aluminium/steel with water/steel, when my example is much more far out?
Originally posted by Griff
Originally posted by Haroki
That Q was raised here a while ago. A video was posted of a guy doing 350 kts (about 450 mph?) at 125 ft above sea level, and then pulling up into a 2g climb.
There's no problem.
I'm not disputing you but was he in a 757 when he did this? I'm not an aviation expert so I have no idea either way.