'Al-Qaeda' is a Manufactured Intelligence Front

Americans need to understand just what exactly we are dealing with here. If you go back to the Carter administration and the beginning of our involvement with Afghanistan's Mujhadeen, you will begin to see just how "al qaeda" actually came about. (The CIA and Pakistani ISI created it.) They use it as a false front. Why? After the end of the cold war our ravenous military-industrial complex was left without a legitimate enemy to fight. Presto! "Al Qaeda" steps into the vacuum just in the nick of time. Do the research. It's out there for anyone to find.

One of the most curious aspects of al qaeda to date is that everything they seem to do benefits the Bush administration and the puppet masters.
THINK ABOUT IT!

Here's an article on the subject.

The terrorist event of New York 11 September 20001, and the terror event of Madrid on 11 March 2004, and other terror events commonly connected to Islam, are clearly not related to Islam if we consider that the Al-Qaeda terror organization was established by the C.I.A in the 1980s. Al-Qaeda is nothing but a conveniently "Islamic" front which enables the C.I.A. to commit crimes in the name of Muslims. It is well known that the Mujahadeen terrorists of Afghanistan were organized, trained and funded by the C.I.A. using the Pakistani ISI as a "cut-out" in order to lure the Soviet Army into Afghanistan at the end of 1979. The Mujahedeen can be seen as C.I.A. terrorism with an islamic name and "islamic" perpetrators. Afghanistan has, for all purposes, been destroyed by these fanatics in furtherance of American interests.

The Al-Qaeda terror organization has caused immense damage to Islam, to Moslems worldwide and to the interests of the peoples of all Arab and Muslim countries. The actions of Al-Qaeda have only served to promote the interests of the U.S. and Israel, which are clearly interested in "reshaping" the Middle East in such a way that they can more easily rape and plunder the region at will.

In fact the C.I.A is using the terrorist actions of its proxy Al-Qaeda in order to give the U.S. an excuse to extend their power into and invade the Arab countries, first countries with rich plunder (Oil) like Iraq, Iran, Saudia Arabia, and second any country which is a "threat" to Israel, or more exactly which Israel dislikes for whatever reason. The third objective for which the C.I.A. is using its proxy Al-Qaeda is to engender fear and hate of Islam and Muslims worldwide. This corresponds to an old and tried ploy of colonizers: to slander and denigrate the target population so that it is acceptable and even called for to commit genocide against them. The peoples of Ireland, Africa and the Americas have all suffered this tragedy, and these regions have been colonized. The next obvious victims are Arabs and Muslims by extension because they live in geographic areas rich in oil and other resources, and because Muslims as a collective are not white enough to be respected as full humans by the criminals in London, Washinton and Tel Aviv.
prisonplanet.tv...

anythings is possible I guess. I read this same theory over & over & I still cant help but wonder why so many people give Israel so much credit? IF your theory of the US wishing to colonize the Middle East is correct I seriously doubt Isreal would be anything more than a puppet much like the Mujahadeen was.

"The next obvious victims are Arabs and Muslims by extension because they live in geographic areas rich in oil and other resources, and because Muslims as a collective are not white enough to be respected as full humans by the criminals in London, Washinton and Tel Aviv."

so the Israeli's are white? sounds more like some inferiority complex coming out to me. reverse racism anyone?

The United States needed a new external enemy to justify its massive budgets after the fall of the Soviet Union. Investigate PROBLEM - REACTION - SOLUTION. You will find the truth.

Israel is using the US as its proxy army - a first for the world. (small country having a super power do its bidding.)

[edit on 19-09-2003 by EastCoastKid]

Amen to the notion that Al-Qaeda is exactly the CIA. I can see no other way around the ingenuity of this organization that purports to be an army of Islam when it was actually funded and created by the CIA.

It is one large criminal organization that will stop at nothing to further create the enemy the U.S Administration needs.

so the Israeli's are white? sounds more like some inferiority complex coming out to me. reverse racism anyone?

Actually, the Israelis in power are white. They are not the Biblical Jews as you are lead to believe. The Israelis in power are Khazarian Jews from the Caucusus mtns. in Russia. The Khazarian Jews also made and still make up 90% of Jews around the world. The Khazars converted to Judaism and moved from the Caucusus region following invasion about 1000 or so years ago. Apparently the Khazars are even racist to the Biblical Jews, they are called Sephardic and make up the remaining 10%. The Biblical Jews have lived throughout many Arab countries even when there was no Israel and wouldn't be inclined to fight the Arabs who have been nice and peaceful to them for much of history. But the Khazars in power, they have no notion of the brotherhood with the Arabs. There is so much variation within the Khazars, they don't represent any kind of blood line of Biblical Jews, rather they just share the same religion. And yet, they generally oppress the Sephards...

Here's an essay by John Kaminski. It's brutal but accurate in its assessment. Before I get flamed, let me just say, one more time, I have always supported the state of Israel, its right to exist and its right to defend itself. That doesn mean, however, that I will turn a blinde eye to what I and others see happening. Israel would do well to get rid of Ariel Sharon and his Likudniks - just as the USA has GOT to get rid of the Bush administration. They are leading the world straight down the path to annihilation.

The Deepening Darkness
US-Israeli Mercenaries Pose As al-Qaeda And
Carry Out Staged Beheadings
By John Kaminski
[email protected]
6-24-4

It's truly saddening - and frightening - to see so many people from the 9/11 truth movement and the nominally intelligent sectors of American society duped by the new government fairy tales that Americans Nick Berg and Paul Johnson and Korean Kim Sun-il were beheaded by al-Qaeda terrorists when in fact the perpetrators were international mercenaries who draw their paychecks from the subterranean murder bureau run by the United States Central Intelligence Agency, Israel's Mossad and the hired henchmen of morally bankrupt and Bush-connected Saudi Arabian royalty.

Now that Ashcroft's fake terror alerts within the U.S. fail to draw even a ripple of attention - except for honest intelligence analysts who quickly debunk them as calculated fantasy - the forces of evil run by Dick Cheney and his Soviet-style hit men within the Bush administration have resorted to actual grisly performances of preposterous violence overseas in clumsy attempts to deflect attention from embarrassing news on the homefront and build a case for their incipient invasion of oil fields in eastern Saudi Arabia as their brutal rape of Iraq continues unabated.

But as usual Americans are kept in the dark by their mindlocked mainstream media, surely more warped than the state-controlled Soviet press ever was, and are spoonfed magical tales of evil al-Qaeda deeds from newsrooms that have CIA censors coordinating their vomitous expectorations.
www.rense.com...


By the way, some will say that Rense is full of shizit and this should not be taken seriously. The essay merely appears at Rense. It was also emailed to me by Kaminsky. He knows what he's talkin' about.

I agree 100% that Al-Qaeda is a CIA creation. It should be spelt Al-CIAda from now on by anyone who believes it.

Also, as it is true that Al-Qaeda is basically as CIA terror group then, as I have long believed, it was the CIA and therefore the US government that carried out 9/11.

"Al Qaeda" is what we used to call the Afghanistan Mujahdeen. The CIA and Pakistani ISI created them to help bleed to death and drive out the Soviet Union. It began under the Carter administration and was carried on with the Reagan admin.

How convenient!
After the fall of the Soviet Union and the death of the cold war, the military-industrial complex was in dire need of an external threat to justify its massive defense budgets. PRESTO! Somebody got the bright idea to take those "low-life" ragheads from Afghanistan and make them out to be this big terrorist organization, led by none other than CIA super asset Osama Bin Laden, a/k/a Tim Osman. (Do a google search on that, see what you get).

Look through the smoke mirrors. Ask yourselves the most important question: WHO STANDS TO GAIN? Thus far, just about every terrorist act committed by Al CIAda from the Cole bombing on has benefitted Bush and Sharon.

Here's something I just saw concerning the upcoming Olympics (If something happens at the Olympics, do not be surprised. The Neo-Cons are desperate at this point and will do anything):

Rumors swirl of pending Olympic � False Flag � by Israel



Major concerns over Israel�s role in uncoming Olympics have countries worried.


Countries react

Spanish officials bring up the possibility that Israel was behind the Madrid train bombing . Indonesia refuses to participate after the massive attack that killed 200 people at a Bali resort. Arab countries say � We won�t attend �. They have suffered years of Israeli attacks from Luxor to Egyptair 990 to the recent spat of bombings.

Israel is shocked at such slanderous accusations. Israel's Shin Bet security agency will protect the Israeli team - guarding Israeli quarters in the Olympic village.


Un-named sources say

Israel is bringing in IDF snipers , Shin Beth , private contractors and every gun toting pyscho in Israel. They will combine with NATO, the US and Greece. The fear here is Israel will use this worldwide coverage to pull off a spectacular attack and an Israeli led retaliation ( similar to the staged Entebbe raid )



Officials speculate it will be an air attack







Ex-CIA personal

say they would expect an air attack of sort. Possibilities range from an airliner, to the Goodyear blimp to even a Micro Nuke similar to the one Israel used in Bali.
www.libertyfo... rum.org/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=news_members&Number=292733426&page=&view=&sb=&o=&vc=1&t=-1#Post292733426

I'm Santa Clause btw

Maybe the CIA created humans too...
With all the stuff you claim they're responisble for and all the power they have, I'm thinkin' maybe they're gods, right?

If you go back to the Carter administration and the beginning of our involvement with Afghanistan's Mujhadeen, you will begin to see just how "al qaeda" actually came about. (The CIA and Pakistani ISI created it.) They use it as a false front. Why? After the end of the cold war our ravenous military-industrial complex was left without a legitimate enemy to fight. Presto! "Al Qaeda" steps into the vacuum just in the nick of time. Do the research. It's out there for anyone to find.

One of the most curious aspects of al qaeda to date is that everything they seem to do benefits the Bush administration and the puppet masters.
THINK ABOUT IT!

Or at least have god-like foresight.

Funny how they knew during the Carter administrator that Bush jr. would be President now.


Everything Al Q. has done has benifited the administration? Care to explain? Besides kill a few thousand people they (Al Q.) have done nothing. So how is doing nothing helping Bush out?
Oh, and Bush's approval rating is at it's lowest point...so either you don't know what you're talking about or they're not doing a very good job helping him.

Unplug and do some research.

Here's an excellent place to start:

According to this 1998 interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the CIA's intervention in Afghanistan preceded the 1979 Soviet invasion. This decision of the Carter Administration in 1979 to intervene and destabilise Afghanistan is the root cause of Afghanistan's destruction as a nation.

M.C.

The CIA's Intervention in Afghanistan
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski,
President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser


Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998
Posted at globalresearch.ca 15 October 2001
www.globalresearch.ca...

Un-named sources say

Israel is bringing in IDF snipers , Shin Beth , private contractors and every gun toting pyscho in Israel. They will combine with NATO, the US and Greece. The fear here is Israel will use this worldwide coverage to pull off a spectacular attack and an Israeli led retaliation ( similar to the staged Entebbe raid )

Here's a quickie historical reminder. Do you recall any other country besides Israel having its athletes murdered during an Olympic Game while most people stood around and allowed it to happen? Oh I didn't think so.

Israel has grown a bit since 1972's Munich fiasco and if you have a problem with them wanting to keep the animals away from their athletes, frankly that's too bad.

In case the memory of this incident escapes some of you here's a BBC Archive of it: news.bbc.co.uk...

It bothers you that Israel feels the need to send their own protection of their athletes instead of relying on people who don't like them all that much? Now there's a problem with Israel participating at all? Oh well.

[edit on 6-29-2004 by Djarums]

I hate to break it to you, but there just a few other significant events that happened in Afghanistan before Carter signed that presidential directive. For example:

April 27, 1978 - Hafizullah Amin stages of coup against the existing Afghanistan government, resulting in the death of the former head of state, Mohammed Daoud Khan. The communist People's Democratic Party of Afghanistan (PDPA) takes control. Nur Mohammed Taraki is named President, Prime Minister, and General Secretary of the PDPA. Amin and Babrak Karmal are named deputy prime ministers. The country is renamed the Democratic Republic of Afghanistan (DRA).

Spring 1978 - Traditional tribal resistance (insurgency) begins.

Late Spring 1978 - Soviets begin discussions with Amin about possible removal of Taraki.

December 5, 1978 - The PDPA signs a friendship treaty with the Soviet Union.

February 15, 1979 - The U.S. Ambassador Adolph Dubs is abducted by insurgents and killed during a rescue attempt ordered by Amin. The U.S. accuses the Soviet Union of initiating the gunfight leading to his death. No replacement Ambassador is appointed.

March 1979 - The Soviet Union begins massive military aid to Afghanistan, including 500 military advisors (with families, implying a long-term commitment) arriving to provide assistance.

March 10, 1979 - Afghan military units located in Herat mutiny, killing 350 Soviet citizens. By March 20, the mutiny is quelled, with great loss of life.

May 1979 - Soviet advisors begin taking over operations at Bagram air base from Afghan government technicians. Diplomatic dispatches and articles in Pravda begin referring to Afghanistan as a �member of the socialist community�. Many take these public statements to mean that the Soviet Union now regards Afghanistan as falling under the Brezhnev Doctrine.

So, as you can see, President Carter's decision to begin arming and training the forces who would eventually be called the Mujahadeen was well based in logic and the anti-communist politics of the time. There were alot of factors involved which motivated Carter. He knew that a Soviet-controlled satellite state of Afghanistan would mean Russian troops on the Iranian border. At the time, Iran was an ally and a massive buyer of our military goods and supplier of crude oil. Keeping the Soviets as far away as possible from the Persian Gulf (and it's oil and warm-water ports) was paramount.

Sorry, but Afghanistan was well destabilized before Carter even knew there was a problem. All Zbigniew Brzezinski indicated was that by getting the Soviets involved up to their necks with Afghanistan, it would be an excellent way to bleed them slowly of money, resouces and men.

And the strategy apparently worked to perfection.

One thing the CIA doesn't have is a working crystal ball. If they could have foreseen the monster (Taliban / Al-Qaeda) they would have played a part in creating, I'm sure they would have thought twice about aiding the Mujehadeen. But sometimes you have to pick the lesser of two evils.

ECC, I respect your right to believe in what you want. But if you think the CIA created the Mujahadeen simply so they could have a credible enemy to fight in the future to drive our military-industrial complex.......well, I think you are all wet.

As I said earlier, I support Israel. But I do not support the current government. They are just as nefarious as the Bush administration. In posting that I was simply pointing out what others are thinking and saying, with regard to this subject. Other countries are growing uneasy about it and are threatening to pull out. Are their concerns not legitimate?

The situation in Saudi Arabia is not looking good. There is an effort being undertaken to destroy the House of Saud. Qui Bono? (Who benefits?) The U.S., of course. Once they get to a certain point of destabilization, the U.S. military will have to move into the kingdom to "re-establish" security. More oil boys!

This from the Telegraph - UK:

Saudi Envoy Claims Zionist
Link To Al Qaeda
By Christopher Hart
The Telegraph - UK
6-27-4

The Saudi ambassador to London has reinforced controversial claims by the kingdom's royal family of a link between "Zionists" and recent al-Qaeda terror attacks in the country.

In a television interview, to be broadcast today, Prince Turki al-Faisal is asked about comments made by Crown Prince Abdullah, Saudi Arabia's de facto leader, that "Zionist hands" have been behind the attacks.

The ambassador replies: "When you're under attack by people who come and kill your countrymen and visitors to your country, and you see at the same time an attack on the kingdom from the outside, from Zionist circles, it is natural to make a connection."
As I said earlier, I support Israel. But I do not support the current government. They are just as nefarious as the Bush administration. In posting that I was simply pointing out what others are thinking and saying, with regard to this subject. Other countries are growing uneasy about it and are threatening to pull out. Are their concerns not legitimate?

The situation in Saudi Arabia is not looking good. There is an effort being undertaken to destroy the House of Saud. Qui Bono? (Who benefits?) The U.S., of course. Once they get to a certain point of destabilization, the U.S. military will have to move into the kingdom to "re-establish" security. More oil boys!

The most important thing to understand regarding Zionism is that it refers to a POLITICAL ideology, NOT to the Jewish race. For example, Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld are Zionists and are NOT Jewish. Do not confuse the two!

Link to the above article:
www.rense.com...



[edit on 19-09-2003 by EastCoastKid]

Originally posted by Pyros
ECC, I respect your right to believe in what you want. But if you think the CIA created the Mujahadeen simply so they could have a credible enemy to fight in the future to drive our military-industrial complex.......well, I think you are all wet.

It's quite a bit deeper than that.

What, the water your standing in? On that I will agree..

I don't see why anyone else would feel uncomfortable because Israel is protecting their athletes who have previously been murdered by Islamic Militants. I think every athlete participating in the Olympic Games has a right to feel that they don't have to sleep with one eye open because they have a big red bullseye on their back. If a rule such as the Israeli Security people have to stay only where their athletes are, so be it. But you can't read the story of Munich and tell me they don't have a right to protection especially because the situation now is even more volatile than it was in '72.

As for other people's security personnel... hey maybe I was uncomfortable about having foreign security working a mile from my house... can I kick them out? Oh... wait... there's some of them snapping photos of the Empire State Building and Brooklyn Bridge. Yet Iran would have less trouble bringing security for their athletes than Israel would. I don't think the Israelis would snap pics of the Acropolis for future plans though.

It's mindboggling what these people are getting away with. In fact, everything has seemed off since 9/11...like we're just watching them get away with things, even if they are made obvious. It's been sort of surreal every since this crap started. I'm not the only one who has this feeling that it's fake. My instincts have always been good, and they tell me that there is something very suspicious and very wrong about this whole thing. Of course, trying to tell people of this is like screaming at the deaf, as usual.

[edit on 29-6-2004 by Damned]

Here's some more False Flag articles to chew on:

FAKE TERROR - THE ROAD TO WAR AND DICTATORSHIP

It's the oldest trick in the book, dating back to Roman times; creating the enemies you need.
www.whatreallyhappened.com...


did CIA fake terror bombings i philippines?


remember lavon affair in 1954? Has US done something similar here?

A DISTURBING PIECE OF NEWS We GOT IN THE MAIL:

From: [email protected]
Date: Sun Nov 10, 2002 12:23 am
Subject: CIA CAUGHT FAKING TERROR IN PHILIPPINES!

The following set of three articles below unmasks both the Bush-Cheney
regime and its principal local partner, the Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo-Angelo
Reyes government, of their lies that they are seriously fighting terrorism
here in the Philippines. For these articles show that *they themselves are
the ones coddling the terrorists in our midst.*
la.indymedia.org...




What were they doing?

Five Israelis were seen filming as jet liners ploughed into the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 ...




Were they part of a massive spy ring which shadowed the 9/11 hijackers and knew that al-Qaeda planned a devastating terrorist attack on the USA? Neil Mackay investigates



THERE was ruin and terror in Manhattan, but, over the Hudson River in New Jersey, a handful of men were dancing. As the World Trade Centre burned and crumpled, the five men celebrated and filmed the worst atrocity ever committed on American soil as it played out before their eyes.

Who do you think they were? Palestinians? Saudis? Iraqis, even? Al-Qaeda, surely? Wrong on all counts. They were Israelis � and at least two of them were Israeli intelligence agents, working for Mossad, the equivalent of MI6 or the CIA.

ww1.sundayherald.com...


The truth is out there ... right?
At first, it all seemed so obvious. It was those Islamic terrorists. Osama bin Laden. Mullah Omar. George W. Bush had nothing to do with it ... did he?

Ian Mulgrew
Vancouver Sun
Saturday, February 23, 2002


AP Files / President George W. Bush continued speaking to kids after the attack ... hmm.
�

Reuter Files / The World Trade Center towers explode and burn after being hit by planes Sept. 11.


"The right wing benefited so much from September 11 that, if I were still a conspiratorialist, I would believe they'd done it."

Norman Mailer
homepage.mac.com...

What were these guys up to?

Mossad Agents Arrested
In Attempt To Bomb
Mexican Congress
From www.kosmos.uni.cc...
11-26-1

Interview with Journalist Hector Carreon on 11-30:
www.broadcast.com...

From the PGR (Mexican Department Of Justice) official web site comes an interesting story.

As reported in La Vox De Aztlan, two men, one of them a former Israeli Colonel and Mossad agent, were arrested INSIDE the Mexican congress carrying 9mm pistols and dynamite, but were released following intense pressure from the Israeli Embassy.
www.rense.com...



Another example of state-sponsored terrorism:

According to Samraoui's insider knowledge, the state-run terrorists were recruited from existing Algerian opposition Islamists, who were turned around after arrest, and then run by such entities as the CPO operations department of the secret services.
www.pegmusic.com...



'Al-Qaeda' is a Manufactured Intelligence Front

Kawther Salam | June 25 2004

During the past weeks, two American hostages have been killed and decapitated in Iraq and in Saudi Arabia. The media say that these crimes were comitted by Islamic Terrorists.

I have never read any Islamic Rule in the Koran which allows the decapitation of people whether they are Moslems, Christians or Jews, for any reason whatsoever.
prisonplanet.tv...

For many years, terrorism was perceived as a contest between two sides: on the one hand, a group of people or an organization, and on the other, a sovereign state. However, during the course of the second half of the twentieth century, various countries began to use terrorist organizations to promote state interests in the international domain. In some cases, states have established "puppet" terrorist organizations, whose purpose is to act on behalf of the sponsoring state, to further the interests of the state, and to represent its positions in domestic or regional fronts. In other cases, states sponsor existing organizations, on the basis of mutually interests.
www.ict.org.il...


There is much more out there on this subject. Fake Terror is the oldest trick in the book as Mike Rivero pointed out.

No one said the Koran advocates beheading people for political gain. And CERTAINLY no one believes that the Islamic Militants are following the true teachings of Islam. It's called perverting religious beliefs in order to gain followers and it's nothing new. Nothing is more effective when trying to do something than telling people it's their religious duty to do it.

You can either believe that the loony clerics promoting these things are CIA tools or you can believe that they are maniacal extremists using "religion" to accomplish their goals. I find myself believing the latter. This is not a new concept.