It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ADDIS ABABA, Ethiopia (AP) -- Scientists in northeastern Ethiopia said Saturday that they have discovered the skull of a small human ancestor that could be a missing link between the extinct Homo erectus and modern man.
The hominid cranium -- found in two pieces and believed to be between 500,000 and 250,000 years old -- “comes from a very significant period and is very close to the appearance of the anatomically modern human,'' said Sileshi Semaw, director of the Gona Paleoanthropological Research Project in Ethiopia.
Archaeologists found the early human cranium five weeks ago at Gawis in Ethiopia's northeastern Afar region, Sileshi said.
LiveScience.com
Originally posted by iori_komei
I hope that I get to see the day that the human evolutionary tree is complete.
Comments, Opinions?
Originally posted by Rasobasi420I foresee IDers complaining about not having the "missing link" between modern man and this particular skull.
Rasobasi420
I foresee IDers complaining about not having the "missing link" between modern man and this particular skull.
Source
In contrast, the theory of intelligent design holds that there are telltale features of living systems and the universe that are best explained by a designing intelligence. The theory does not challenge the idea of evolution defined as change over time, or even common ancestry, but it does dispute Darwin's idea that the cause of biological change is wholly blind and undirected.
Source
Delson said the fossil found in Ethiopia "might represent a population broadly ancestral to modern humans or it might prove to be one of several side branches which died out without living descendants."
Intelligent Design is not Creationism by: S. Meyer
By contrast, ID holds that there are tell-tale features of living systems and the universe that are best explained by a designing intelligence. The theory does not challenge the idea of evolution defined as change over time, or even common ancestry, but it disputes Darwin's idea that the cause of biological change is wholly blind and undirected.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Now can you imagine if Christians claimed, "Creation proof found", based on a couple of fragments of skull they had for 5 weeks?
I have to wonder about the mind'set' of many posters, in the way they jump to support anything that seems to give weight to a Godless view of life and yet use belittleing, insulting language to answer those of an opposing view.
posted by Jamuhn: “My understanding of ID is that they do not deny evolution, but rather they believe that evolution is a directional process. But, it's good to see that science is progressing (which should not be confused with faith in God declining, they can very easily be complementary). Jamuhn]
Rasobasi420 ID’ers complaining about not having the "missing link" between modern man and this particular skull.
Originally posted by Rren
Bit early to be calling this a "missing link" but interesting none-the-less... nice find
[edit on 26-3-2006 by Rren]
Originally posted by iori_komei
This thread is about a scientific discovery of a fossil that fills one of the gaps in our evolutionary history, it is not a place for people to argue whether evolution is true or not.
Thank you.
Originally posted by suzy ryan
Well if you don't want arguments about evolution being true or not, then maybe you shouldn't all but declare it as fact, in the way you structure your sentences.
Asking people of faith to withhold their views, is the same 'crime' 'science' (falsly) accusses Bible believers of. Isn't science about 'testing'? Can't you test your ideas against those of Bible believers.