100's of Muslims protest Muhammad cartoons in London…But how many protest terror?, page 11


Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 10:19 AM by skippytjc
More developments on this subject:

Five die in Afghan cartoon furore

news.bbc.co.uk...


Two people died when protesters turned on the American airbase at Bagram, even though the US has had no involvement in the cartoons' publication.

In Somalia, a 14-year-old boy was killed and several others were injured after protesters attacked the police.

Rallies have also taken place in India, Thailand, Indonesia, Iran and Gaza.


And some images borrowed from Drudge:






The bottom line is that some Muslims, enough to cause riots on many continents, are making cartoons depicting their prophet enough of an issue to bring negative attention to their faith. Attention it does not need. I think this energy is better spent of fighting the extremists within rather than against non Islamic artists portrayals of their prophet


[edit on 6-2-2006 by skippytjc]



reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 11:23 AM by Freedom_for_sum
Originally posted by skippytjc
I think this energy is better spent of fighting the extremists within rather than against non Islamic artists portrayals of their prophet


I would agree skippy, except for one thing: Arab Muslims, in general, believe the west (US, UK etc) is at war with Islam. Saudi Arabia's Grand mufti
called for Islamic unity in the face of the West's war on Islam in his sermon during the Hajj.

He urged Muslims to unite, return to the essence of Islam and shun terrorism as well as Western ideas aimed at destroying their religion under the guise of women's and human rights. "What's known as terror is forbidden under Islamic doctrine," said the Mufti. "Islam is being unjustly targeted through an effort to attribute the philosophy of terror to this religion."


Clearly, this Mufti is feeding into the belief that the West intends to destroy Islam.

Despite the fact that we are fighting "extremism" in the war on terror, Muslims perceive that we are instead fighting Islam.

"Oh, Muslim nation, there is a war against our creed, against our culture under the pretext of fighting terrorism. We should stand firm and united in protecting our religion," he said. "Islam's enemies want to empty our religion from its contents and its meaning," said Sheikh Abdul Aziz. "But the soldiers of God will be victorious," he said. The faithful called out: "Amen."


So what is the answer to the question: Why, when extremists decapitate the heads off their kidnapped victims or blow themselves up in crowded place, killing innocents, including children, are Muslims relatively silent on the matter that you can hear crickets in the background; yet when cartoons satirize the Prophet Muhammed the Muslim world suddenly rises up in a deafening roar out of anger to protest, destroy property, and even kill?

Where is the outrage that these extremists are hijacking Islam by misinterpreting its teachings? Where is the puplic display of anger and destruction that this minority of misunderstanders of Islam cause destruction and murder in the name of Islam?!?

My answer: I'm beginning to believe that Muslims, in general, want these extremists to succeed in the hopes that Islam will become the dominant religion in the world. The actions on the part of Muslims world wide seem to be the best spokesmen on Muslims true desires and intentions.



reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 11:26 AM by Souljah
I have read in the Local Newspaper that some Muslim Group published a Charicature of Anna Frank and Hitler togather in Bed. They said it not ment as an insult or provocation, but as a Test of Freedom of Speech.

Muslim cartoon provokes fury among UK Jews

Independant

An anti-Semitic cartoon in a Muslim paper, which depicts Israel's acting Prime Minister, Ehud Olmert, as a hook-nosed figure wearing a giant Star of David, last night drew protests from MPs and Jewish groups.

For days, Muslims across the world have been protesting about European newspapers that published drawings showing the Prophet Mohamed. One MP accused the editors of hypocrisy.

Yesterday a newspaper published cartoons that Jewish groups say they find offensive, and US generals protested about a cartoon in the Washington Post. It showed Donald Rumsfeld, the Defense Secretary, beside a limbless soldier, but the generals said, on behalf of the normally robust Mr Rumsfeld, that the drawing was "tasteless".


But I don't know if this is the Case I read about.

I guess this is just still the RE-action and a replay to Danish Cartoon.

[edit on 6/2/06 by Souljah]


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 11:34 AM by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Souljah
I have read in the Local Newspaper that some Muslim Group published a Charicature of Anna Frank and Hitler togather in Bed.


www.fransgroenendijk.nl...

Hitler and Anne Frank after having sex.

Of course they are missing the point. The Muhammad cartoons were
a political cartoon telling a 'truth' as the cartoonist saw it. They were
crass (in my opinion) ... but the cartoonist and the publications had
a right to print them.

Having Anne Frank and Hitler having sex .. well ... what truth
could there possibly be found in that? It's just junk.
And it doesn't say anything of political value. At least I don't
see anything.

But of course the Muslims go and hit up the Jews ... not the
Danes where it all started, eh?

It's a whatever.

[edit on 2/6/2006 by FlyersFan]


reply posted on 6-2-2006 @ 11:35 AM by Beachcoma
Originally posted by AceOfBase
They were conducted in the spring of 2005.
That's only one year ago.

I gave you the figures for Britain and that wasn't enough so I gave you figures for other muslim countries and that's still not enough. I can't give you data for every muslim country or every muslim population living in the west.


[edit on 6-2-2006 by AceOfBase]


My mistake, I saw a whole row of 2003s and 2002s and thought otherwise.

I suppose what I'm driving at is this -- do you notice a pattern there? Maybe it's not obvious, but to me, it seems like countries like Jordan and Lebanon, owing to their proximity to Israel, which we all know the Arab countries don't like, well that factor may have weighed into their support for violence. I'm not saying it's right, I'm just saying that the reasons probably have less to do with "kill the infidels" and more to do with a vengeance/blood feud.

Also if you noticed, in other countries where the violence is escalating such as Indonesia, Phillipines or Thailand, standards of living are not so great. On a special note, Indonesia may be muslim in name, but they don't really practise it the way it should. I know for a fact because of my country's close proximity and also because we have plenty of Indonesian immigrants working here. Even my maid is Indonesian.

Yes, my family has had plenty of Indonesian maids (they work on a 3 year contract basis) and of the dozen or so maids that we've had, only one of them knew what their religion was about. Imagine that, just one! The others had to learn about it from us.

Look, I'm not trying to deflect the blame or anything here, but I'm just pointing out what I see, what I perceive. There's no doubt that there are elements in the "muslim" communities that are undesirable. But to say that we are just biased and only see what we want to see is a little harsh, when the same can be said about any group of human beings on the planet.

I've mentioned this on another thread, but I'll point it out again. This is what I think is going on with elements in the aforementioned countries --

Imagine you live in, say Indonesia (coz that's the easiest for me to personally visualize..). Your government's pretty crooked. It's getting better, but crooked is still crooked. Your life is deplorable. You have no prospects. Unemployement is close to 50% (it's true, that's why they look for employment in Malaysia). Education-wise you were lucky you finished high-school (most don't, better work on the farms/factories to help the family's financial situation) The situation appears hopeless.

And then you come in contact with a charismatic religious figure. He tells you stories about the afterlife (true or untrue I leave it up to you). You're thinking "My life is crap! Listening to this guy may not be such a bad idea. At least he can guide me in my preparations for the afterlife." And so you start listening to this imam. And it so happens this imam is one of the fundamental types. Whether that is by choice or whether it is because that's what this imam was taught, who can say? Now you just found religion. You become passionate about it (like all born-again people are). You hear another story about what appears to be more Western insensitivities (be it true or not, at this point it hardly matter). This further reinforces your believe in the fundamental teachings. And so you declare your vendetta against the West and all it stands for.

My point is, desperate and uneducated masses, no matter from what culture are dangerous. They are easily swayed.

I hope this gives you a better understanding of the dynamics involved.
Pages: <<  8    9    10    11    12    13    14  >>    ^^TOP^^