Michael Skrooch manages the Information Operations Red Team and Assessments (IORTA) group at Sandia National Laboratories.
Could your team, if you wanted to, take down the entire grid in the United States?
The IDART red team could demonstrate numerous vulnerabilities and system effects against U.S. critical infrastructure that are scenario-dependent and
adversary-dependent. We do this so that we can help improve the systems so that they can't be taken down in the future, and a cyber Pearl Harbor
won't affect the U.S. infrastructures.
But could you if you wanted to?
I won't answer that question. ...
Joseph Weiss, a control systems engineer with KEMA Consulting and a leading expert in control system security.
So just put it in all perspective. What's the worst-case power scenario, power we're talking here -- power lines, power grid?
Absolute worst? I won't even say absolute, but a very worst case could be loss of power for six months or more.
Over how big an area?
Big as you want.
Is that a possibility?
Yes.
How?
I'd just as soon not go into it.
But you believe, as an expert, a man who understands these systems, that indeed that is a possibility?
It's possible.
Why isn't Washington quaking in its shoes?
I can't tell you. I don't know. I don't know.
Couple this with latest MS bug and wow, the internet is still the wild, wild west.
Paraphrased: Anyone still caught uttering "electronic Pearl Harbor" in 1999 is either an ex-Cold Warrior trying to drum up
anti-terrorism funding through the clever use of propaganda, completely out of it, or a used-car salesman/white-collar crook of some type.
Like old Jacob Marley, Richard Clarke -- the broken record of the National Security Council -- is produced to rattle his electronic chains and
howl menacingly for the rubes.
" . . . Richard A. Clarke of the National Security Council, repeatedly warns them that 'cyberterrorists' could launch computer attacks 'shutting
down a city's electricity, shutting down 911 systems, shutting down telephone networks and transportation systems,' as he said in a recent
interview."
More accurately, Clarke has been stupefyingly repetitive on the subject through 1999, beginning with another Weiner-penned article on February
1