It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
They used napalm? Ok.......its illegal, you say? How is that? Napalm is used for fire bombings. What is the problem here? Its part of warfare. I still fail to see what is so bad about it. it has been used alot. Illegal by whose standards?
Originally posted by Skadi_the_Evil_Elf
But napalming a bridge, well, bridges dont care if they get incinerated. No reral harm done, just a strateigic descision, thats all.
Originally posted by Mokuhadzushi
Well, Napalm doesnt conform to the chemical weapons ban treaty definition of chemical weapons. It is nevertheless a chemical agent causing "unnecessary harm" to those affected, and is therefore a war crime, as the above link on international law amply demonstrates.