It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
doubletap
mOjOm
WTF are you talking about. Are you so unreasonable as to think that serving a gay couple for example means that it means they are allowed to have gay sex on the tables or something??? Are you afraid some gay guy is going to come into a coffee shop, not to order coffee but to float around the room redecorating the place and waving their Gay in everyone's face????
Are you really that messed up and delusional???? Because your stance is like something a 4 y/o would try and argue based off their wildly over active imagination.
Realistically, I don't even understand how the hell these business owners are going to know someone is gay anyway unless the person comes out and says it. Maybe everyone wearing a pink shirt gets assed out or something...I don't know...edit on 26-2-2014 by mOjOm because: (no reason given)
As a business owner, why should I not have the right to refuse service to blacks or gays simply for that reason? Its my business, my property, my money, my lost income, and my freedom to associate with whoever I choose.
No one, (gay, straight, black, white) has the right to compel someone to do business with them. I have been denied service because I was white. I didnt cry about it, I didnt sue, I simply went to their competition and gave them my money.
Darth_Prime
how are they going to say who is and who isn't gay? are they going to ask everyone? are they going to test everyone? that is the "Freedom" you want?
beezzer
mOjOm
reply to post by beezzer
Hell no. I don't support taking away guns from people. Not at all. Own all the guns you want. I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that if you are a gun owner and you have one on you, that you should leave it in the car while you come in my business to drink whiskey and watch the ball game though.
Nobody is removing your rights to a gun, but in some buildings or whatever you don't need to be packing heat. It is a deadly weapon after all. I don't think it's required to arm yourself while purchasing a mattress or some dining room chairs.
You're right.
The business has an individual right to determine who they want into their business.
Ooops.
The legal point is that taxpayer money pays for the utilities which serve the business, for the street repairs leading up to the business, for the police and fire protections which would be needed if something happened inside the business, and for lots of other everyday things.
doubletap
Darth_Prime
how are they going to say who is and who isn't gay? are they going to ask everyone? are they going to test everyone? that is the "Freedom" you want?
While certainly not every gay is identifiable by appearance only, a very large number of them are by sound and appearance.
mOjOm
beezzer
mOjOm
reply to post by beezzer
Hell no. I don't support taking away guns from people. Not at all. Own all the guns you want. I don't think it's unreasonable to ask that if you are a gun owner and you have one on you, that you should leave it in the car while you come in my business to drink whiskey and watch the ball game though.
Nobody is removing your rights to a gun, but in some buildings or whatever you don't need to be packing heat. It is a deadly weapon after all. I don't think it's required to arm yourself while purchasing a mattress or some dining room chairs.
You're right.
The business has an individual right to determine who they want into their business.
Ooops.
It's not the owner of the gun they are asking to leave. It's the GUN!!!! This isn't difficult to understand why are you trying so hard to twist what I'm saying. The gun owner is more than welcome to come in, but the deadly weapon which is just an object that the owner is carrying around has to stay out.
Some places don't let you bring in your Bike or park your car inside either, is that Driver Discrimination too??? No, the driver can come in, but he must park and leave his car outside.
neo96
reply to post by Aleister
The legal point is that taxpayer money pays for the utilities which serve the business, for the street repairs leading up to the business, for the police and fire protections which would be needed if something happened inside the business, and for lots of other everyday things.
The taxpayer pays for a business owners light bill ?
Since when?
The business owner does, and the business owners also pays property taxes too.
Lot more than individuals do by the way.
What angers me is Discrimination and wanting protection for it hiding behind "Religion"
LDragonFire
So will this law allow atheists to refuse service to Christians?
Why does ones religious right always seem to discriminate against other people?
LDragonFire
So will this law allow atheists to refuse service to Christians?
Why does ones religious right always seem to discriminate against other people?
Brewer just vetoed this bill.
edit on 26-2-2014 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)edit on 26-2-2014 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
mOjOm
The Federal Civil Rights Act guarantees all people the right to "full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin."
So no, actually you can't refuse service to someone just because you don't like them. Not if your business is one that serves the public. If you don't want to treat the populace which makes up the public then don't start up a business that serves the public. Start one that only serves private or select members only.
You can spin this new Discrimination Law anyway you want, it doesn't matter, it's discrimination of certain people of the public based upon one's personal bias and bigotry toward people you don't like, that's all it is. What's worse is that it's not going to end with Gay people either. Religious business owners will no doubt use Religion to justify all kinds of people to Discriminate against based on their interpretation of whatever religion they belong to. Do you realize how many various groups or individuals all the various religions have issues with??? Think about it. Muslims, Mormons, Catholics, Scientologists, Christians, etc. They all discriminate on basically everyone other then themselves but even discriminate against each other too for nothing more than differences in ideology.
LDragonFire
reply to post by neo96
Hmmm you and breez on the wrong side of public opinion again? Not for smaller government in this case? Not for saving tax payer dollars enforcing this?