It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Infrastructure..
The U.S. ranked 25 in this category, falling behind countries like Saudi Arabia, Spain, and South Korea.
None of that means anything in the context of infrastructure spending. It's just hyperbole to prove your point that this is all bad because Obama's Admin are the ones doing it.
No, it's not.
Yes, the majority of infrastructure at the local and state level can fall under that, but the state has neither the time nor the resources in most cases to develop proper infrastructure strategies and then subsequently deploy them
There's the other point to mention here, which is that the proposal isn't even on the table yet, and you've already dismissed it.
Indigo5
Infrastructure..
The U.S. ranked 25 in this category, falling behind countries like Saudi Arabia, Spain, and South Korea.
www.businessinsider.com...
Hell...Obama should have made a speech saying he refuses to invest in Infrastructure!! The GOP would have had an Infrastructure bill on the house floor the same afternoon.
I honestly don't know what to do with people so addled by partisanship that they shout "Yay!!! Crumbling bridges!"
Indigo5
Infrastructure..
The U.S. ranked 25 in this category, falling behind countries like Saudi Arabia, Spain, and South Korea.
www.businessinsider.com...
Hell...Obama should have made a speech saying he refuses to invest in Infrastructure!! The GOP would have had an Infrastructure bill on the house floor the same afternoon.
I honestly don't know what to do with people so addled by partisanship that they shout "Yay!!! Crumbling bridges!"
BritofTexas
Why has this Thread not been thrown into the Rant forum where it belongs.
It's just one big whine by an OP who (for their own reasons) does not like the POTUS or anything that they do. There is nothing of substance here, even by U.S. Political Madness standards. Just one of the worst "Obama smells of Poo" Threads.
Indigo5
Infrastructure..
The U.S. ranked 25 in this category, falling behind countries like Saudi Arabia, Spain, and South Korea.
www.businessinsider.com...
Hell...Obama should have made a speech saying he refuses to invest in Infrastructure!! The GOP would have had an Infrastructure bill on the house floor the same afternoon.
I honestly don't know what to do with people so addled by partisanship that they shout "Yay!!! Crumbling bridges!"
Indigo5
reply to post by Krazysh0t
And it is rational thinking like that which makes me pay attention to your posts even when we disagree.
neo96
What happened to the near 900 billion for "shovel ready" work in 2009?
Indeed what happened to it ?
pavil
neo96
What happened to the near 900 billion for "shovel ready" work in 2009?
Indeed what happened to it ?
Well our neighborhood got fancy Wheelchair accessible curbs on every street corner that I have NEVER seen a wheelchair on in almost 2 years..... That's progress. Never mind actually prioritizing road construction projects to benefit the most citizens.
And... the roads that have been redone by such expert construction companies, well it's been two years, you can't expect a road to last that long now, can you? They seem like they were built as sturdy as any Chinese Dollar Store Trinket.
Let's face it, our Government (Both Parties really) are incompetent boobs..... No offense to all the competent Boobs that are out there. You shouldn't feed them more money.
oblvion
They already had 800 billion at the start of Obama's first term for infrastructure spending, what was the result of that?
How did this happen? States and local governments are the biggest part of the story here. They've historically provided the vast majority of spending for roads, highways and bridges, and they've been pulling back on spending since 2008 as a result of the economic downturn and requirements to balance their budgets. California’s transportation spending declined by 31 percent from 2007 to 2009, for instance. Texas's fell by 8 percent.
teamcommander
reply to post by neo96
They have been working on the interstate highway system since the 1950s.
The work was to be funded by the taxes on fuel used for traveling over the roads.
I would be willing to bet these funds have been diverted to other "uses" over the past several years and we now have to find a way to raise the money which should be already available for the maintance of this infrastructure.
It's just to bad we will never know what other "pork, I mean pothole" it has been used to fill.
neo96
teamcommander
reply to post by neo96
They have been working on the interstate highway system since the 1950s.
The work was to be funded by the taxes on fuel used for traveling over the roads.
I would be willing to bet these funds have been diverted to other "uses" over the past several years and we now have to find a way to raise the money which should be already available for the maintance of this infrastructure.
It's just to bad we will never know what other "pork, I mean pothole" it has been used to fill.
Back in the day.
Wanna know what states did to build their projects ?
They issued bonds.
Now there 'go to' answer is a hand out to the feds.
Something seriously wrong there.
neo96
reply to post by oblvion
Or Obama instead of blowing money create a federal lottery to pay for it.
Like what the states did.
Federal Powerball, or Megamillions.
Both the state, and feds get a cut off the top.
Half of the jackpot.
oblvion
reply to post by Indigo5
If they were going to pass the money off to state and local governments to do the job I would be all for it, but I just dont see that happening.