It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ErosA433
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Wow that doesn't even work as a logical argument
So your 'evidence' or 'proof' that Dark matter falsifies the big bang theory is because electricity is plasma? Yeah, now thats what I call out of the box thinking.
Deny ignorance and all that right?
There's a lot more evidence of dark matter than evidence of electric currents powering the sun. At least with dark matter we can show things like galactic rotation curves, so there is evidence. Now are these curves the result of dark matter or something else like MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics)? There has been some debate about this but MOND can't seem to explain bullet cluster observations, so dark matter is hypothesized. If someone has a better explanation for the galactic rotation curves, gravitational lensing, etc, now would be a good time to present it. Note plasma is not proposed as a mainstream alternate explanation to either dark matter or MOND because it doesn't have any explaining power that fits the observations in any logical way. Some scientists haven't completely given up on MOND either, which I can understand since we haven't found dark matter directly yet, at least not the WIMP kind...we are finding more baryonic dark matter all the time (exoplants) but not enough.
poet1b
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
At least we know, will a great deal of evidence, that lighting, plasma, and momentum exists.
Dark matter on the other hand?
Eros just doesn't know you as well yet...it was obvious to me but I've probably seen more of your posts to help me interpret it.
DenyObfuscation
Now this is interesting. I can't blame you for not realizing my comment was extremely sarcastic
poet1b
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
At least we know, will a great deal of evidence, that lighting, plasma, and momentum exists.
Dark matter on the other hand?
If you knew anything about
If you knew anything about electrical theory then you would know that both potential and current exist as a result of ions.
No, plasma is not an ionized gas, or anything like a gas. This is well proven.
Plasma is considered the 4th state of matter and comprises more than 99% of the visible universe. Most often, it is defined in terms of a gas.
Arbitrageur
Eros just doesn't know you as well yet...it was obvious to me but I've probably seen more of your posts to help me interpret it.edit on 16-3-2014 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
Arbitrageur
There's a lot more evidence of dark matter than evidence of electric currents powering the sun. At least with dark matter we can show things like galactic rotation curves, so there is evidence. Now are these curves the result of dark matter or something else like MOND (MOdified Newtonian Dynamics)? There has been some debate about this but MOND can't seem to explain bullet cluster observations, so dark matter is hypothesized. If someone has a better explanation for the galactic rotation curves, gravitational lensing, etc, now would be a good time to present it. Note plasma is not proposed as a mainstream alternate explanation to either dark matter or MOND because it doesn't have any explaining power that fits the observations in any logical way. Some scientists haven't completely given up on MOND either, which I can understand since we haven't found dark matter directly yet, at least not the WIMP kind...we are finding more baryonic dark matter all the time (exoplants) but not enough.
poet1b
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
At least we know, will a great deal of evidence, that lighting, plasma, and momentum exists.
Dark matter on the other hand?
Eros just doesn't know you as well yet...it was obvious to me but I've probably seen more of your posts to help me interpret it.
DenyObfuscation
Now this is interesting. I can't blame you for not realizing my comment was extremely sarcasticedit on 16-3-2014 by Arbitrageur because: clarification
A NASA educational website tells us that “mass is a measure of how much matter a planet is made of.” It shows that the confusion of mass with quantity of matter infects astrophysics.
The consequences are profound for cosmology. The mass of a celestial body cannot tell us about its composition. . . .
What is gravity?
Gravity is due to radially oriented electrostatic dipoles inside the Earth’s protons, neutrons and electrons. . . .
www.holoscience.com...
poet1b
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
Plasma might be defined as gas, which is nothing more than old concepts that are dying away.
The fact remains that plasma has very little if anything, in common with gas.
poet1b
reply to post by DenyObfuscation
No, I disagree with your interpretation. I posted one thing, and you claim I posted another.
So is it your claim that plasma is just a gas, or is it the fourth state of matter?
Or do you see a considerable amount of difference between gas and plasma?
No, I disagree with your interpretation.
I posted one thing, and you claim I posted another.
What is in a fluorescent light?
Is it gas or plasma?
Does the light switch being on or off affect the answer?
poet1b
reply to post by dragonridr
I explained how it is the plasma/ions.
Sorry you don't understand.
poet1b
reply to post by dragonridr
Except I have actually posted accurate descriptions of how electricity works, and on other issues involving plasma science.
Often with links and quotes from respected sources.
While you have posted hot air.
And several times you have been proven flat out wrong in your claims.
edit on 17-3-2014 by poet1b because: typo