It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Chamberf=6
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
Just because the answers were found apart from religion does not mean they cannot provide evidence for religious claims.
Where is the evidence, though? I see a reaching speculation that "god did it".
In a vacuum (the void before "god" spoke), there would be no sound, vibrations-- okay, sound-- no.edit on 2/25/2014 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
ServantOfTheLamb
Chamberf=6
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
Just because the answers were found apart from religion does not mean they cannot provide evidence for religious claims.
Where is the evidence, though? I see a reaching speculation that "god did it".
In a vacuum (the void before "god" spoke), there would be no sound, vibrations-- okay, sound-- no.edit on 2/25/2014 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Your speaking as though you absolutely know what was there before all was there.....can I see some proof?
Chamberf=6
ServantOfTheLamb
Chamberf=6
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
Just because the answers were found apart from religion does not mean they cannot provide evidence for religious claims.
Where is the evidence, though? I see a reaching speculation that "god did it".
In a vacuum (the void before "god" spoke), there would be no sound, vibrations-- okay, sound-- no.edit on 2/25/2014 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Your speaking as though you absolutely know what was there before all was there.....can I see some proof?
Are you saying you can hear sound in a vacuum? Jump on up to space on a golden chariot and yell.
Chamberf=6
Also if the Earth hadn't been formed in Gen. 1:2, then how could the spirit of god hover over the waters? The waters of what?
It also said that all was in darkness when the Earth was finally formed. so the planet came before the sun?
This geologist happens to think that continental drift is the result of a sudden axial shift rather than a long drawn out process: www.axialshift.com... What will you say about him? Are his ideas not scientific enough?
BELIEVERpriest
Chamberf=6
Also if the Earth hadn't been formed in Gen. 1:2, then how could the spirit of god hover over the waters? The waters of what?
It also said that all was in darkness when the Earth was finally formed. so the planet came before the sun?
The earth was restored in 6 days, not created. God created the universe, then earth became desolate and god restored the earth in 6 days.
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
Chamberf=6
Also if the Earth hadn't been formed in Gen. 1:2, then how could the spirit of god hover over the waters? The waters of what?
It also said that all was in darkness when the Earth was finally formed. so the planet came before the sun?
When these verses are read in the original language a gap of time between the two verses implied. So, "God created the heavens and the earth..." something the text doesn't tell us occurs, and then"...the Earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep."
What you are reading there is the re-creation of the Earth after that event.
Grimpachi
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
This has all been gone over many times before. Science says NOPE.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Chamberf=6
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
When these verses are read in the original language a gap of time between the two verses implied. So, "God created the heavens and the earth..." something the text doesn't tell us occurs, and then"...the Earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep."
So in that implied gap, it's ok to just speculate about this "gap" and then tell others "Something happened and so the Earth had to be restored, but it doesn't say that. You just have to fill in the blanks and gaps of god's word". ??
What you are reading there is the re-creation of the Earth after that event.
Says who? Not this word of god book.edit on 2/25/2014 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Chamberf=6
Grimpachi
reply to post by ServantOfTheLamb
This has all been gone over many times before. Science says NOPE.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
That's a good choice of a post to point to.
So in that implied gap, it's ok to just speculate about this "gap" and then tell others "Something happened and so the Earth had to be restored, but it doesn't say that. You just have to fill in the blanks and gaps of god's word". ??
Grimpachi
reply to post by Chamberf=6
So in that implied gap, it's ok to just speculate about this "gap" and then tell others "Something happened and so the Earth had to be restored, but it doesn't say that. You just have to fill in the blanks and gaps of god's word". ??
Like I said the mental gymnastics that must be performed are a feat unto themselves. Once you get to the part where a guy lived inside a fish then it is an entirely different level of cognitive dissonance.