It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
DeadSeraph
reply to post by JadeStar
Thanks for the detailed response. Do you think that there could be breakthroughs that will allow us to determine or at least infer the makeup of a planets atmosphere in the relatively near future (say in the next 20 years)?
I'm curious if there are any methods (even in theory) that could allow us to determine these important facts from earth,
or if we will pretty much be in a sort of limbo until we are able to get probes to other star systems to study the makeup of these planets? Given that even the closest stars are still staggeringly far away, it would seem we could be hundreds of years away from actually seeing an earth sized planet in another star system (or being able to actually measure it's atmospheric qualities).
TiedDestructor
reply to post by JadeStar
Post of epic proportions! Thank you.
A planet-hunting project is snapping pictures of alien worlds and other objects orbiting nearby stars in an effort to give scientists a better understanding of these intriguing exoplanets.
ANTONIO M. ROSARIO/GETTY IMAGES
Project 1640 is designed to probe the atmospheres of exoplanets to create new, low-resolution images of the planets and their stars. By understanding the atmosphere of the planets and the composition of the stars, scientists working with the project could potentially learn more about how they formed.
Scientists working with Project 1640 — an imaging system at the Palomar Observatory in California — are using the specialized system to survey about 200 stars looking for a range of planets and other objects, project scientist Ben Oppenheimer said at the American Museum of Natural History event on Feb. 5. According to AMNH officials, Project 1640 is "the most advanced and highest contrast imaging system in the world."
stormbringer1701
the size of this planet does not make the ability to detect what they did noteworthy. it's easier to determine stuff about gas giants in general but what is notable is they were able to detect water in a planet that was not a fit for the two most often used techniques which involves the planet being the right distance from the star or being a transiting planet. Instead they used an unrelated technique and that means that being able to gather intelligence on any planet not just special ones has been advanced.
www.sciencedaily.com...
GaryN
Just keep in mind that astronomers may not be seeing what they think they are.
Rife with hype, exoplanet study needs patience and refinement
phys.org...
As there are no decent images yet of Alpha Centauri, let alone any possible planets, all this talk of detecting planets around stars thousands of light years away really makes me doubt their claims. A.Cent A and B are most likely planets IMO, and anything around them moons. When we can see A and B with the same detail that we see our Sun, through SOHO, then I'll believe they are Suns.
stormbringer1701
statistically, red dwarfs have a 1/6 chance of having an earth sized planet in it's rather snug life zone.
alpha proxima; the closest star to us is a red dwarf. as are Barnard's star and wolf 359. We have Three of them within 6 light years with the closest one being just 4.26 ly away. and within ten LY there are even more.edit on 25-2-2014 by stormbringer1701 because: (no reason given)
And yet some of these indirectly detected planets have been subsequently imaged optically. so there is that. also the pessimistic writers there neglect the fact that these indirectly detected planets have spawned a rapid increase in our capability to detect them by different means. i remember when it was commonly said that to detect a planet around another star would take a telescope larger than the planet. is that true now? no. we can resolve planets with relatively small terrestrial based instruments. in conclusion i think the authors of that article went way too far in their pessimism. we already know that some of these detections are likely false. these guys want to throw cold water and they do not care that any water throwing is totally unnecessary. by gum they're gonna throw that water. in short. they are nerd hipsters.
GaryN
Just keep in mind that astronomers may not be seeing what they think they are.
Rife with hype, exoplanet study needs patience and refinement
phys.org...
As there are no decent images yet of Alpha Centauri, let alone any possible planets, all this talk of detecting planets around stars thousands of light years away really makes me doubt their claims. A.Cent A and B are most likely planets IMO, and anything around them moons. When we can see A and B with the same detail that we see our Sun, through SOHO, then I'll believe they are Suns.
douggie60
reply to post by JadeStar
Excellent, a planet twice the size of Earth. We can screw that one up twice as much.. send a prob..edit on Tue20140000005553America/Chicago60 by douggie60 because: spelling
Rezlooper
Thanks for the heads up JadeStar. Realistically, the universe is too vast and it's probably not too far off in our distant future that we find out there are many Earth-Twins, and not too far off from that time, we may find they are booming with life. Interesting times indeed!