It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
snypwsd
wmd_2008
reply to post by Arken
Seriously some members on here need to look more closely at images, they are not the same perspective and not taken from the same location, to be honest with these threads there are a certain group of members that are so desperate to find something they make silly assumptions about images this is a fine example!
And some people need to read comments before posting on threads.. if you did you would have seen that we all discussed it before you had time to put your 2 cents in.
wmd_2008
snypwsd
wmd_2008
reply to post by Arken
Seriously some members on here need to look more closely at images, they are not the same perspective and not taken from the same location, to be honest with these threads there are a certain group of members that are so desperate to find something they make silly assumptions about images this is a fine example!
And some people need to read comments before posting on threads.. if you did you would have seen that we all discussed it before you had time to put your 2 cents in.
So what !!!!!
My comment wasn't just about the obvious sorry VERY OBVIOUS change in perspective, it's about the simple FACT that many of theses threads are created by a group of individuals that SEEM to have spent there entire life on planet Earth with their eyes shut!
It so OBVIOUS that it was due to a change in perspective due to pictures taken at different locations so why was the thread done in the first place
I don't believe that anyone would not have seen this at some point during their life either in books,films or for themselves if they ever bother to look at the world round about them.
Seriously some of the things posted on here at times really makes me wonder what's happened to the education system world wide especially BASIC SCIENCE!
dlbott
wmd_2008
reply to post by Arken
Seriously some members on here need to look more closely at images, they are not the same perspective and not taken from the same location, to be honest with these threads there are a certain group of members that are so desperate to find something they make silly assumptions about images this is a fine example!
Wow someone needs a zanax and a warm cup of milk lol. The perspective does not change that much as to make those large rocks disappear lol.
The Bot
alienreality
wmd_2008
snypwsd
wmd_2008
reply to post by Arken
Seriously some members on here need to look more closely at images, they are not the same perspective and not taken from the same location, to be honest with these threads there are a certain group of members that are so desperate to find something they make silly assumptions about images this is a fine example!
And some people need to read comments before posting on threads.. if you did you would have seen that we all discussed it before you had time to put your 2 cents in.
So what !!!!!
My comment wasn't just about the obvious sorry VERY OBVIOUS change in perspective, it's about the simple FACT that many of theses threads are created by a group of individuals that SEEM to have spent there entire life on planet Earth with their eyes shut!
It so OBVIOUS that it was due to a change in perspective due to pictures taken at different locations so why was the thread done in the first place
I don't believe that anyone would not have seen this at some point during their life either in books,films or for themselves if they ever bother to look at the world round about them.
Seriously some of the things posted on here at times really makes me wonder what's happened to the education system world wide especially BASIC SCIENCE!
Part of the scientific method includes and allows that mistakes can be made. Mistakes in science are always made and this is what leads to learning and understanding by further experimenting and such. If the Image in this thread was never commented on here by anyone, people would not have seen it or the strange contents seen within. There is plenty more in these images than just 2 missing rocks, and I'm very glad I got to see these.
But what you are saying is actually discouraging the scientific method, did you realize that?
If you can explain the nature of the spherical disk inside the fissure in the big rock formation, I would like to hear it. I'm betting the scientists at NASA would also like to know..
wmd_2008
So what !!!!!
My comment wasn't just about the obvious sorry VERY OBVIOUS change in perspective, it's about the simple FACT that many of theses threads are created by a group of individuals that SEEM to have spent there entire life on planet Earth with their eyes shut!
It so OBVIOUS that it was due to a change in perspective due to pictures taken at different locations so why was the thread done in the first place
I don't believe that anyone would not have seen this at some point during their life either in books,films or for themselves if they ever bother to look at the world round about them.
Seriously some of the things posted on here at times really makes me wonder what's happened to the education system world wide especially BASIC SCIENCE!
alienreality
reply to post by wmd_2008
No no, lets not turn this into what I would have done or some other ad hominem attack on me. Let's just stick to productive things, or perhaps you might feel happier somewhere else entirely.. It appears you are feeling a lot of angst so maybe somewhere with a forum that Jerry Springer is hosting..
killianhgore
actually, has anyone found a Jesus face yet?! If I had five minutes to WASTE I'm sure I could find one!!!
Havick007
reply to post by Arken
Usually I am the last person to come in and try to debunk a thread like this!
I think this might be a perspective issue.
The MSL had moved further to the left of the main rocky outcrop and the smaller rocks have been hidden by the change in perspective.
Look at the difference in perspective view from the rock - circled in blue;
Then as the "rover" moves further on past the formation -
That is just my opinion though..edit on 25/2/14 by Havick007 because: Added images
jamesthegreat
The rock in the distance that you are making as a reference point has two smaller rocks behind it. If the camera angle has changed as much as you have indicated, wouldn't the position of the two rocks behind your reference point also have changed? They appear to be in exactly the same position, it is as if they have just been cut and pasted there.
The second photo does look as if it has been taken at a lower angle, which would account for the foreground difference, but the two disappearing rocks look to be large enough to still be seen. But then again, maybe not.