It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Raelsatu
I'm going to pose a future situation; a hypothetical albeit realistic one if we follow this technological road we're going down. The situation I'm creating is a frame of reference to compare against the moral standing of monotheistic deities, most notably the god from Biblical scripture. My main question here would be, would you consider the perpetrator evil, or justified/righteous in action.
At some time in the next 5 decades humans create a near-perfect hybrid of classical and quantum computing technology, thereby allowing for simulations to be run. The simulations may or may not contain conscious beings, but in the case of Victario he decides to spawn a simulation where conscious beings (humans) populate a 'special' planet. Victario decides it would be in his interest to spawn a couple other alter dimensions that fit in with the narrative of his universe. Either one of these secondary dimensions is only accessible to entities living inside the simulation, following death; one is an experiential plane of utter bliss, and the other a plane of endless agony. He has foreknowledge that the majority of sentient creatures in his simulation will not abide by the rules, therefore for all intents and purposes being hell-bound. Despite being aware of the incomprehensible horror of the simulation he's set forth, he goes on with the plan.
So let's assume that you yourself live X amount of decades into the future, where simulations are run regularly; and the consensus is that conscious simulated humans are equally as aware as we are. Would you see Victarios decision to premeditate the design of a simulation where most creatures are tortured eternally to be good/perfect, or evil? If you choose the latter then I would ask in what situation would this ever be considered not evil? If you pick the former then why would you consider it to not be so?
edit on 23-2-2014 by Raelsatu because: (no reason given)
AfterInfinity
reply to post by JamesCookieIII
Rock on, man.
JamesCookieIII
Victarios would be cruel, no? unless they had no souls and thus didn't truely live - and even then, it would be pointless to torture them no? but the problem I have is that this analogy could not be our reality. we have a loving God, so he wouldn't make anyone suffer eternally. nah, he sent his only Son and chose to forgive us just cause he likes us.
AfterInfinity
reply to post by Raelsatu
Ever seen the Cube trilogy? Would you consider the creators and implementors of that facility to be evil?
JamesCookieIII
oh and Jesus - he died to show us that death is only the beginning. he was the ultimate sacrifice. It shows God's love I think.
He was willing to die a horrible death to show that love wins definitely. God never leaves someone as beautiful as an ATS member to burn. so to liken God to a less than 100% loving creator just don't float my boat. he has proven to me that if I ask I shall recieve. not what I want, but what I need.edit on 2/23/2014 by JamesCookieIII because: (no reason given)
AfterInfinity
reply to post by Raelsatu
Ever seen the Cube trilogy? Would you consider the creators and implementors of that facility to be evil?
JamesCookieIII
AfterInfinity
reply to post by JamesCookieIII
Rock on, man.
Will do. But if they were soulless, what would you think then?
CynConcepts
A creator can experience many aspects knowing that none of it is 'real', it is all simulated. This then would not be cruel or evil. New creations of simulations can be created over and over to observe and experience different realities. In other words, it in reality only has meaning for the creator's experiences, it's own consciousness divided amongst all of the simulations. This would be self analyzing and Good/evil would not even be in question then. It would simply be self experientialism at its most extreme. What do you think?