It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TDawgRex
reply to post by lostbook
Where does it say "Navy" in the article? I must have missed that.
Keeping track of all the debris is a huge task. Maybe some one will start to police it up for salvage someday. I thought I had heard of France thinking about this.
intrptr
reply to post by lostbook
So the military is sending up satellites to "monitor" other satellites. I thought they already do that. Then the ruse is "monitor" but more likely cover for intercept capability in case of war?
Disabling satellites is better done from a platform in space, no?
TDawgRex
reply to post by lostbook
I've read the article three times. I'm still not seeing "Navy". I even tried the find function.
Good thing I'm not looking for space junk...I guess I'm blind.
lostbook
There is rumored to be a secret Navy Space command, however.
A registry of launchings has been maintained by the Secretariat since 1962, in accordance with General Assembly resolution 1721 B (XVI)
binaryangel
Well I think its not their jurisdiction, but hey its not like any international agency is keeping tabs on what objects are launched into space:
intrptr
reply to post by lostbook
So the military is sending up satellites to "monitor" other satellites. I thought they already do that. Then the ruse is "monitor" but more likely cover for intercept capability in case of war?
Disabling satellites is better done from a platform in space, no?
Zaphod58
reply to post by Trillium
There is not a currently known system for scanning and monitiring geosynchronous orbit. The X-37B is in a lower orbit.
I think TPTB have been hiding things up there and now the cover is about to be blown, so they have to scramble to protect their secrets. It's just a hunch tho.