posted on Mar, 1 2014 @ 04:47 AM
reply to post by whatsecret
I came across this Italian blog about 9/11 by Enrico Manieri that claims that NIST report is correct.
too bad it's NOT the report that is the problem, 2005 NIST found NO REASON why these three buildings fell on 9-11......it's the LATTER 2008
HYPOTHESIZED claims PUSHED as the official story that IGNORES the official report.....that are the problem....
lol....oh, and HOW con one SCIENTIFICALLY prove when NO DATA concerning the official claims has EVER been released outside the authors?????
"NIST is withholding 68,246 files. These records are currently exempt from disclosure. All input and results files of the ANSYS 16 story and the
LS-DYNA 47-story global collapse model that were used to simulate sequential structural failures leading to collapse."
NO PEER REVIEW!
so how can one possibly corroborate , unreleased data??????
(an engineering firm run by Leslie E. Robertson, the designer of the World Trade Center)
DUH-bunker site LIES!!!!!
Robertson DID NOT design the towers, he started a company AFTER he left Skillings Company whom BUILT the towers. His only involvement with NIST was
the LYING 2008 NIST HYPOTHESIS crew used HIS server farm to HYPOTHESIZE their scenario they REFUSE to verify, validate, PEER REVIEW! to the public
from this PUBLIC investigation..
he as HIRED as a Mechanical Engineer by J.Skilling, lead Structural Engineer of the towers, AFTER the project started...Worthington, Skilling,
lol.....tell me another story!!!!!!