It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
...on Thursday, August 11, 2011 Health Canada removed nine supplementary fixed point detectors that were installed in British Columbia and the Yukon in response to the Fukushima nuclear incident. In addition, on September 15, 2011, Health Canada will end its weekly data postings...
Measurements from these networks have confirmed that the quantities of radioactive materials that reached Canada as a result of the Japanese nuclear incident were very small... The very slight increases in radiation across the country, observed during the first few weeks following the onset of the incident, were smaller than the normal day to day fluctuations from background radiation.
You know those were air monitoring stations, right? You know there are other (permanent) stations in BC, right? They are listed on the page you provided. Those temporary stations were there to monitor atmospheric levels of contamination from Fukushima, not seawater. Since radiation measurements never rose above background levels there was no reason to continue using the supplemental stations.
my question is why would the Federal Government remove 9 monitoring stations in BC and Yukon...the closest stations to the wave of radiation coming from Japan
I can't. But these guys can and they aren't using "testing kits."
Why don't you go out and prove me wrong?
You said you were sure that contamination had reached the west coast. Why are you sure?
Actually there are two main types of radiation; electromagnetic and particle.
They absolutely bank that people think all radiation is the same - and harmless.
www.plosone.org...
After this manuscript was originally submitted, similar gamma-ray counting measurements were performed on samples of weeds collected in Oakland and on vegetables and milk sold commercially in the San Francisco Bay area. In some of these samples, low levels of the same fission products observed in the rainwater were also detected. The levels of activity observed in these samples also pose no hazard to the public.
This is my last post on anything related to Fukushima as I have wasted enough time trying to calm the alarmists down and I am tired of swinging the sword.
Phage
Are you munching on seafood just the same as before the Fuku disaster?
Yes. But then, I've never eaten seafood from the Fukushima region.
Do you only eat seafood from the Atlantic or is it Pacific and arrived with an all-clear, no Fukushima itinerary and a stamped passport? Lots of fish have huge migration patterns or are shipped from Asia.
Sorry for the sarcasm, but could you clarify?
I ask because I can't always get a clear answer out of supermarkets and restaurants. I'd love to be that confident and as I look out my window where the Pacific sits about sixty feet from my window I can't help but wonder.
Mamatus
Talk about beating a dead horse....... I am so over people ignoring reality. What is the reality?
1. Fukushima radiation is being tracked and monitored by organizations not associated with Government or the Nuke industry.
2. Radiation off of California has been tracked to the Farallon Islands nuke dump and zero isotopes from Fukushima have been found.
3. Starfish are not dying from radiation, this has also been proven.
Fukushima Alarmists are just like Birthers and 911 Truthers in that they will ignore any proof whatsoever to protect their beliefs.
Lots of people on this site so badly want to believe that Fukushima is poisoning us all and that there is a giant coverup. Yet they flat out refuse to do the research. So many here are embracing Fukushima stupidity that I have lost interest in interacting with them any longer.
Fukushima Alarmists are like the knight fighting the black knight in Monty Pythons Holy Grail. No matter how many limbs they lose in the fight, they still think they can win. This is my last post on anything related to Fukushima as I have wasted enough time trying to calm the alarmists down and I am tired of swinging the sword.
edit on 22-2-2014 by Mamatus because: added content.
igloo
Phage
reply to post by wishes
Actually there are two main types of radiation; electromagnetic and particle.
They absolutely bank that people think all radiation is the same - and harmless.
Mostly what we are talking about with nuclear contamination is particle radiation. While different radioactive materials emit different levels of radiation, the radiation is pretty much the same and results in the same effects on living things.
Whether or not a living think can cope with radiation depends upon the amount recieved in a given period of time. We are exposed to radiation all the time and it is "harmless" because it is at low levels.
We are also "breathing in" contamination from Chernobyl and atmospheric atomic testing, and have been for years. The levels of radiation produced by this contamination is harmless. People living in Denver get more radiation than those living in Los Angeles but both get background levels.
- It had a major explosion that went up into the atmosphere and prevailing winds come my way (British Columbia). What was in that explosion is 'not' harmless and we're all now breathing it in.
What is your source of evidence that increasing levels of contaminated water are being released into the ocean?
- They continue to pour 24/7/365 thousands of tons of radioactive water directly into the ocean and Tepco continually 'corrects' the official amounts of water and radiation levels 'actually' being released in ever increasing volumes and toxicity.
Yes.
- The prevailing currents from Japan travel towards Alaska and down the west coast.
Yes. If the rate of influx of radioactive material exceeds the rate of efflux from an organism. If levels of radioactive contamination are low, bioaccumulation does not occur.
- radiation is bioaccumulative
Unless, of course, the source of the leak can be discovered.
- They have NO END date for the radiation "leaks/gushes/outpourings/storage/etc." so it is going to continue for at least decades if not centuries
They are?
- They are burning radioactive waste which is also going into the air and 'coming our way'
Good thing there are sources other than TEPCO.
- They have been caught lying again and again so no, I don't believe ANY reassurances from them.
It was?
even in animals when 100 years ago it was very uncommon?
I don't think Fukushima is no big deal. I also don't see the point in waving my arms and saying "We're gonna die!" Does it make you feel better to do so?
Anyone who thinks Fukushima is no big deal simply doesn't understand or see the bigger picture.
www.geigercounters.com...
Since Fukushima, much interest has developed in the application of checking food and water for possible radiation contamination. Here are your options:
Rely on government agencies, such as the EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration) in the US, or
Procure the same equipment used by those agencies and conduct your own tests. These include specialized devices like Multi-Channel Analyzers for Gamma Spectrometry, etc. which are quite thorough and able to detect very low levels of contaminants, along with which isotopes are present.
Or, acquire a personal radiation detector which, while not as effective or thorough as the above alternatives, is readily available to the lay person and easy to use.
In the end, the effectiveness of a Geiger counter in detecting contaminated food and drink, in my opinion, comes down to a matter of degree. Heavily contaminated food is potentially detectable by many Geiger Counters of reasonable sensitivity. Weakly radioactive food might be detectable by some pancake GM tube models in combination with a timed count process. But there could theoretically be a minimum amount of radiation particles missed by any Geiger counter. So anyone using a Geiger counter for this purpose needs to take responsibility for that decision, versus other alternatives.
As a matter of interest, I have scanned everything from milk to soy sauce to sake, and the only radioactive item I have found so far is a batch of captured Arizona rainwater. Specifically, I detected 6 CPM (Counts per Minute) of radiation from the sample, using the Digilert 100 Digital Geiger counter, a standard-tubed (not pancake) model, so that instrument is still pretty sensitive to have achieved that feat. I would add, though, that a momentary scan itself of the captured rainwater failed to reveal any contamination - the radioactivity become apparent only through a 20 minute timed count.
In another example, a Canadian customer used the Inspector to determine that his imported Japanese tea leaves were contaminated. He conducted a 30 minute timed count, showing a total reading of 53 CPM from the tea, versus background alone of 35 CPM. The difference of 18 CPM over a 30 minute period is not only statistically significant, but conclusively points to radioactivity from the food.
Phage
I have not seen anything about more water leaking into the ocean. I have seen that earlier measurements of radioactivity in waste water were in error. I have also seen that contaminants in non-bottom feeding fish, well as seawater in the Fukushima region have been declining in spite of the leak.
Recent information from Tepco talked about more water and higher levels than previously 'thought'.
The large atmospheric release from Fukushima was short lived. I have seen nothing about continued large atmospheric release from Fukushima.
Chernobyl was short lived and dealt with (relatively speaking).
"Tesla's free energy"... Never mind.
Is insane they are using nuclear power instead of Teslas clean and free energy.
wishes
crankyoldman
I'm not scientist, so I am not allowed to have an opinion that matters but I'll rant anyway.
This testing is for last year of "some" fish. There is still at least 40 years more of radiation hell coming the pacific. Or maybe not as TEPCO is under no legal, or moral obligation to state any facts in the matter. I'll say that again, TEPCO is under no, zero, none, no legal or moral obligation to be either truthful or factual on the matter.
But... If I were a PR person, and I have known more then most, I would say this: "Canada scientists, health officials and concerned politicians have tested fish from the pacific for nuclear radiation from Fukashima and have found no detectable traces. We feel the fish is safe to eat." BTW, I'd say this even if I found plutonium in Tuna headed for the local sushi bar.
Then I'd have the science class simply hammer on this "study" to prove there is no issue. I'd be careful to never say there will never be an issue, but this will be assumed via the PR campaign because one study said there was no issue.
Then any one who insists that testing from 2013 isn't enough I will have the scientist use the old "deconstructionist" method to ridicule everything out of their mouths, even if it is as stupid as saying " they misspelled radiation using two "a's" so how can you believe this guy. I will make sure the scientists never, ever, touch the moral problem, the consciousness problem or anything other then sticking to computer data and personal attacks on naysayer.
If all else fails I'll simply change the metrics on the people. I'll say there are more fish, less water, or more water and less fish, or that people don't eat those fish, or that, only good radiation makes it to the fish.
When you know PR people, you'll know the are the lowest form of human on the planet, when you know scientists who rely on corporations and universities you'll know they are more then willing to whore themselves out to anyone who will pay in order to become a PR person for their employer.
Yes, exactly! They are experts at talking and saying nothing yet people walk away feeling like they've been reassured! I get really frustrated how many people don't realize how easy it is to get scientists, politicians, anyone say what they're told to say rather than what's right because if they don't, they lose their job or their family is threatened or they're simply taken out.
Unity_99
I would be questioning how they get their random samples. One of my closest friends knows quite a few natives fishing the west coast for herring. And what is alarming the native villages is that all the herring have melted eyes.