It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
TKDRL
reply to post by HomerinNC
They should be able to, unless stated otherwise in a parole agreement. Once parole is up, then that is that. Turning people into second class citizens after they have "paid their debt to society" is ridiculous. Especially with the ridiculous mountain high book of "laws" meant to feed people to the for profit prison industry.
stirling
More prick waving-vote grabbing-voter pandering-but meaningless legislation.....
beezzer
reply to post by eLPresidente
Don't get me wrong. I applaud this.
But I worry that this sets the stage for division within our fragile, broken country.
In recent threads, I've seen a further desire to separate, divide, rather than unite.
Madison clearly expected the states to serve as a check on federal power. He laid out the blueprint. And when the people of states have followed it, they’ve found success. But sadly, states seldom follow Madison’s prescription. Why? Because the people don’t demand it. Too often, they grovel in marble hallways along the Potomac and beg federal officials to stop abusing their authority, instead of demanding that they stop. The power ultimately lies in us – the people.
We can’t blame the Constitution for our failure to enforce it.
Far too many Americans view any resistance to federal authority as rebellion. They need to recognize that the true rebels are elected officials, federal bureaucrats and functionaries in Washington D.C. who refuse to respect the constitutional limits of their power. It’s time for us to take on our proper role in this system and put down the rebellion.
As Madison said, the means are “powerful and at hand.”
alienreality
reply to post by Indigo5
Although state efforts to nullify federal laws generally have been tossed out by courts, Missouri and other states have decided to try anyway.
This is just wording by some MSM to hold to their mandate of propagandizing everything they publish so it reflects the current administration.
I say this because nullification by states does NOT depend on any court rulings to implement in the first place.
Nullification is simply eradication of an illegal federal law and it doesn't require any court trial to "pass"
The illegal law is already in the garbage dumpster. If their is a trial over it, those attending the trial are just putting on a circus act for the media.
A similar gun rights bill passed the [Missouri] Legislature last year, but was vetoed by Democratic Gov. Jay Nixon. A veto override attempt failed in the Senate after the chamber's two top Republicans voted against the measure because of concerns over several provisions.
The Montana law already met a major legal blow. In 2009, Montanan Gary Marbut sued to be able to make and sell his .22 caliber rifle, the “Montana Buckaroo”, without federal interference. The Ninth Circuit Court ruled on Aug. 29 of this year that federal laws requiring licensing fees and government inspections preempt Montana’s law. “[E]ven if Marbut never sells the Buckaroo outside of Montana, Congress could rationally conclude that unlicensed firearms would make their way into the interstate market,” Judge Richard R. Clifton wrote for the three-judge panel, citing the 10th Amendment’s so-called Commerce Clause. Mabut said he will appeal the decision to the Supreme Court.
When Nixon vetoed Missouri’s nullification law, he cited a different rule: the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause, which gives precedence to the laws of the nation over those of respective states. The Supreme Court has routinely ruled in favor of the federal government on supremacy issues, and several legal experts who spoke with TIME said that nullification laws will probably not survive future court cases.
But that doesn’t mean states will stop trying. “Historically, nullification laws have been enacted at various points in time,” says Richard Levy, professor of constitutional law at the University of Kansas. “A lot of time when there are controversies and there’s an ideological polarization, nullification laws crop up, but historically they’ve never worked.”
she carries too. as well as having guards. so she is a class AAA hypocrite as well an olympic class loon.
SheopleNation
LMAO! I bet that puke bag witch Diane Feinstein is having a bad hair day after hearing about this! LMAO!
Hopefully she will come unhinged, and someone with authority will throw her into a mental asylum, and in the nearest padded room with a straight jacket strapped on.
That women is a dangerous, crack pot lunatic that needs to be locked up as soon as possible before she does anymore harm to The United States Constitution. ~$heopleNation
stormbringer1701
she carries too. as well as having guards. so she is a class AAA hypocrite as well an olympic class loon.
SheopleNation
LMAO! I bet that puke bag witch Diane Feinstein is having a bad hair day after hearing about this! LMAO!
Hopefully she will come unhinged, and someone with authority will throw her into a mental asylum, and in the nearest padded room with a straight jacket strapped on.
That women is a dangerous, crack pot lunatic that needs to be locked up as soon as possible before she does anymore harm to The United States Constitution. ~$heopleNationedit on 22-2-2014 by stormbringer1701 because: (no reason given)edit on 22-2-2014 by stormbringer1701 because: (no reason given)
beezzer
reply to post by eLPresidente
Don't get me wrong. I applaud this.
But I worry that this sets the stage for division within our fragile, broken country.
In recent threads, I've seen a further desire to separate, divide, rather than unite.
HomerinNC
reply to post by vor78
No, that would still be illegal. SB 613 contains a provision that would prohibit it.
I see, so MO interprets the 2nd amendment as they see fit
hypocrites
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States, respectively, or to the people.