It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
ORLANDO, FLA. — The Air Force needs its new long-range strike bomber, even if it can’t give details.
That was the message of a panel held Thursday at the annual Air Force Association Air Warfare Symposium in Orlando, Fla.
The panel featured a full-throated defense of the long-range strike bomber as a key asset for the future of the Air Force. It was a slightly puzzling attitude, given that the bomber has been identified as one of the big three key modernization programs for the service and has secured what Lt. Gen. Burton Field, deputy chief of staff for operations, plans and requirements, called “great support” from Pentagon and congressional leadership.
“Bombers can send messages. They can influence or initiate action, and they are credible because of what they have done in the past,” Field said, specifically citing events last year when a B-2 bomber flew near North Korea and a B-52 was flown through China’s new air defense zone. “Bombers can send messages fast, and they send messages with credibility.”
Zaphod58
The Spirit of Kansas, in 2008, would have cost $1.2T to replace.
jaxnmarko
reply to post by Zaphod58
Only 550 million apiece? Great! That means we can expect them to cost about 3 billion apiece then, according to the usual huge underestimations of military project costs! Well, not really underestimated, just under reporting of true estimates. Or true padding for extra profits, that is. My dad was a GS 17 for the GAO and I grew up hearing about alllll the costs of our projects and how they are so close to NEVER being even close to accurate, that any time ANY project comes close to an actual estimate, it's HUGE news! We've been held captive by that often mentioned Military/Industrial complex, hand in hand robbing of the American taxpayer for generations. F35, F22, B2, Seawolf..... its business as usual.
darksidius
reply to post by Komodo
Yes but a lot of employement in high tech with war plane And I prefer USA stay the first Air Force in the world instead of Chinese or Russia, USAF need this program to stay ahead in the futur.
jaxnmarko
Only 550 million apiece? Great! That means we can expect them to cost about 3 billion apiece then, according to the usual huge underestimations of military project costs!
“It will be through this bomber program that we have our best chance right now of bringing in the exotic new technologies of the future into new development,” Grant said, citing developments such as directed energy weaponry, hypersonics and alternative fuels as options that could be looked at.
they will probably be used to ferry the no 2 product for the bankers up from south america coke
SayonaraJupiter
jaxnmarko
Only 550 million apiece? Great! That means we can expect them to cost about 3 billion apiece then, according to the usual huge underestimations of military project costs!
$ 550 million x a fleet of 100 = $ 55,000,000,000
Meat and potatoes for the military industrial complex. The US needs these projects, like most modern governments do, to keep the industrial and technological momentum and to manage unemployment in certain sectors. Technology has always been #1 to the US to maintain military superiority at all times.
It's not just the base cost we're talking about but the years, probably decades, of ongoing costs to maintain a fleet of 100 exotic bombers. Richard Nixon would love it. So would Howard Hughes, imho.