It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aleister
A question, thank for any answers. The possible fossil pointed out in this thread, the segmented object, is either a naturally formed rock or a fossilized lifeform. Either or, it seems. So it's the best or one of the best possible lifeform candidates found on a Mars Rover photograph. And it happened because the first rover happened to land in the tiny crater which probably exposed this when it hit nearby. That makes it really old, way down there under ground level, brought to light by a meteorite (another song the Beatles could have sung, if they'd thought of it..."Brought to light by a meteorite" nice line and title for a song. I call dibs on the title, anyone want to add some lines here, or if it gets good maybe we can move it to another thread.....so my question:
On this thread, posters talk about the earth lifeform that comes closest to looking like this one has little arms coming out from a central core. I can't see that on this possible fossil, are you saying this object has tiny arms or is itself a segmented tiny arm. I see the segments fine, and in some areas have some melding into some areas of the surrounding rock. Thanks.edit on 22-2-2014 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
Arken
reply to post by Ross 54
Do you seen the video?
He say in the first minute, and quote:
I've found the remains of life forms that are absolutely, conclusively Extraterrestrial.
edit on 22-2-2014 by Arken because: (no reason given)
Aleister
A question, thank for any answers. The possible fossil pointed out in this thread, the segmented object, is either a naturally formed rock or a fossilized lifeform. Either or, it seems. So it's the best or one of the best possible lifeform candidates found on a Mars Rover photograph. And it happened because the first rover happened to land in the tiny crater which probably exposed this when it hit nearby. That makes it really old, way down there under ground level, brought to light by a meteorite (another song the Beatles could have sung, if they'd thought of it..."Brought to light by a meteorite" nice line and title for a song. I call dibs on the title, anyone want to add some lines here, or if it gets good maybe we can move it to another thread.....so my question:
On this thread, posters talk about the earth lifeform that comes closest to looking like this one has little arms coming out from a central core. I can't see that on this possible fossil, are you saying this object has tiny arms or is itself a segmented tiny arm. I see the segments fine, and in some areas have some melding into some areas of the surrounding rock. Thanks.edit on 22-2-2014 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
dragonridr
Aleister
A question, thank for any answers. The possible fossil pointed out in this thread, the segmented object, is either a naturally formed rock or a fossilized lifeform. Either or, it seems. So it's the best or one of the best possible lifeform candidates found on a Mars Rover photograph. And it happened because the first rover happened to land in the tiny crater which probably exposed this when it hit nearby. That makes it really old, way down there under ground level, brought to light by a meteorite (another song the Beatles could have sung, if they'd thought of it..."Brought to light by a meteorite" nice line and title for a song. I call dibs on the title, anyone want to add some lines here, or if it gets good maybe we can move it to another thread.....so my question:
On this thread, posters talk about the earth lifeform that comes closest to looking like this one has little arms coming out from a central core. I can't see that on this possible fossil, are you saying this object has tiny arms or is itself a segmented tiny arm. I see the segments fine, and in some areas have some melding into some areas of the surrounding rock. Thanks.edit on 22-2-2014 by Aleister because: (no reason given)
He had a theory that the picture on mars shows a crinoid. Here are some pictures im not seeing that in the image.
www.bing.com...
MCL1150
reply to post by wildespace
That has to be the most hilarious things ever!
Let's not go over to those rocks that look like skulls from a distance, if you don't drive up to them for inspection, you'll never know, then why go to mars.
Another one to check out I call the broken table...
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
The King is not only naked, he is a hologram.
lotusfoot
Anyone who is familiar with photoshop and knows what a clone tool is can see clearly that NASA clones over stuff. I know that as sure as I know my name. They do such an aweful job as well.
MCL1150
reply to post by wildespace
That has to be the most hilarious things ever!
Let's not go over to those rocks that look like skulls from a distance, if you don't drive up to them for inspection, you'll never know, then why go to mars.
Another one to check out I call the broken table...
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
lotusfoot
Anyone who is familiar with Photoshop and knows what a clone tool is can see clearly that NASA clones over stuff. I know that as sure as I know my name. They do such an aweful job as well.
wildespace
MCL1150
reply to post by wildespace
That has to be the most hilarious things ever!
Let's not go over to those rocks that look like skulls from a distance, if you don't drive up to them for inspection, you'll never know, then why go to mars.
You send a rover to Mars with specific tasks in mind, such as chemical analysis of rocks and soil, geological analysis from the images, and other types of analysis of the martian environment. You don't just go looking at rocks that might (or might not) looks like skulls or bones in your imagination.
Perhaps all the conspiracy/alternative people can chip in together and send a rover to Mars that will do exactly what you want. ;-)
Another one to check out I call the broken table...
mars.jpl.nasa.gov...
Ever heard of ventifacts?edit on 23-2-2014 by wildespace because: (no reason given)
Arken
reply to post by wildespace
With all due respect, wildespace, but... are you an astrobiologist?
Has you established the Astrobiology Research Group at the NASA/Marshall Space Flight Center?
Stll, I admire your attempt to discredit, wildespace..
Still, I admire your enthusiasm Arken.
Thanks. Enthusiasm and perseverance.
Well, my uncle was a blacksmith and he has taught me how using hammer and anvil, fire and water in order to soften the steel...
wildespace
So he thinks those small round things are fossils, based on the similarity of their shape. But morphology alone cannot be used unambiguously as a tool for primitive life detection.
proceedings.spiedigitallibrary.org...
Those things are probably concretions.
Concretions vs. fossils
So, another thread with a loud, sensational title, but little to show for it. A former NASA scientists does not make an infallible expert; plenty of knowlegeable people with big achievements went down the pseudo-science/conspiracy/anti-mainstream path.
Still, I admire your enthusiasm Arken.