posted on Feb, 21 2014 @ 12:50 AM
Both the Holmes and Lanza shootings had press releases almost at the ready, and a heavy promotion of gun control with the shootings used as justifying
the gun control laws that "they" want.
But both shootings have serious holes in the official stories [seems to be a regular pattern these days], and serious contradictions from
eye-witnesses. This is the exact same trick "they" used in the Port Arthur shootings in Australia in the 1990's which instantly led to strict new
gun control laws, with the Port Arthur shooting used to justify the new laws. Several eye-witnesses reported seeing TWO gunmen, yet the official story
is ONE gunman. Do I believe the word of people who were there and saw it, or do I believe a system that lies to me every single day ?
And just like with Holmes and Lanza, the media picture released of the Port Arthur gunman, Martin Bryant, was also a picture that appeared to make him
look as crazy as possible. One newspaper even admitted to photo shopping his eyes to "make him look more evil". Isn't allegedly killing 35 people
evil enough without having to photo shop his eyes to make him look more evil, unless they had a certain story to sell to the public, so that they will
then willing accept the new laws, just like we did.
Holmes appeared in court so drugged and sedated that there has to be a question asked of WHO drugged him and WHY ?
Lanza was "killed" at the scene, despite no evidence of him being at the scene, which would of been impossible due to the positioning of cameras at
the school. There has to be questioned asked as to HOW he committed this crime WITHOUT being filmed on at least one of the many cameras ?
Martin Bryant had an IQ no higher than someone classed as being mentally retarded, yet pulled of a massacre of 35 people by himself, over several
different crime scenes. He had no military training to explain his precision shooting. He also had several unexplained trips to England, which when
further investigated, revealed that he was taken to a University campus in England, which also had a part of the University devoted to mind control
Not to mention the eye witness accounts of seeing 2 gunmen, with several reports that neither of the 2 looked like the picture they were shown of
Just yet another case of the black-ops doing the dirty work, and then leaving a patsy to take the blame. Eye witness reports contradict the official
report, yet the official report remains gospel and any questioning is dismissed as "conspiracy theory". See how easily they get away with it. And
when most people would rather just say "yep, that's the guy, you got him, lock him up and every thing is back to normal", then it's not hard to
see why they keep using this same tactic over and over. The majority allow it to happen. The majority would rather take the quick fix, spoon fed
dribble that they even know is dribble, but the dribble is easier to swallow than the truth. The majority are lazy, and "they" rely on it !