Global Food Supply Deliberately Engineered to End Life

reply to post by Metallicus


No, it isn't "the way the global elite plan to reduce population" - it's merely ONE of the ways.

They can't rely on food alone to be the culprit that kills most of us.

1. Food (well, crappy food)
2. Prescription and OTC drugs (Rockefeller medicine)
3. Invasive medical procedures (Rockefeller doctors)
4. long working hours (some working 2 part-time jobs to make ends meet)
5. collapsing the US economy (esp. destroying the middle class, already happening)
6. creating hate in two-sided systems (black vs. white; religious vs. non-religious; Republican vs. Democrat; etc.)

All of these things are ensuring that we destroy ourselves and the elite get to sit back and watch. They need the populous at odds with each other for their plans to work.

So far, they are winning.

reply to post by Metallicus

Oversighted, overlooked, mass production, mass populations, cutting corners, profits and everything in between including population control and way of getting rid of byproducts by renaming them and reselling them to you, all while making a$ much of a killing they can get away with in the mean time. All of which = Your current state of things. Its not called processed food for nothing, but in reality it is more along the lines of reprocessed foods. As the population grows things will be stretched, and stretched, and more of the same will ensue, as truth is its not really sustainable the way its set up and operated now, and never was meant to be sustainable.

reply to post by nixie_nox

in the 1950s, the average family spent 15% of their household income on food. Now it is down to 5%. But we have far, far more of it. What does that tell you?

That the average family now spends 95% of their income on housing, and the bankers and land barons have more pull in Washington than food producers.

oringinall posted by soficrow
That the average family now spends 95% of their income on housing, and the bankers and land barons have more pull in Washington than food producers.

Agreed. And what good would dead people be to the companies that want to make money off them. The whole premise of killing oyur customers off at an early age is absurd.

reply to post by LouisCypher


Its not about money for them. Currently, yes. But they have access to the highest black op tech, can create with machines, step into holographic meetings that are very realistic. They don't need money. But they do value ownign the world and its all its resources and so a much smaller reduced group of non equal, middle class, northern hemisphere slaves, is right up their alley. But what they're doing is trying to ensure it doesnt look like they did it. They hide behind the suns activities and earth changes and amp with technology. They make accidents with nuclear and pretend they're only meaning well with GMO and heavy metal poisons everywhere. They shift it all off of them.

They don't want the world overrun but humans who are entitled to equality and resources. They don't serve anything like that. People are like tampons to them and they are pledged to the dark side.

They want it all, and in pristine shape, and all along, fossil fuels and polluting industries meant money for them while maintaining their power base.

The real technologies they're using under the wrappers, are clean, but they also can be used by everyone to become empowered and not need them as an infastructure for energy, food growing, de salination of water, purification of water and toxins. In other words, they would become one of us.

And so to them, we have to go. They want to have it all, own it all, have it clean, have us gone. Maintain power. They don't need real money to do that. Its not about money, its about power.

stormcell
All that added sugar is causing people to become overweight and die early from weight related problems.

Like I said. Not fast enough! Global population numbers just keep rising and rising.

If you go along with the "Big Pharma" conspiracists, then what "they" would want is not to kill people, but to keep them alive as long as possible, but in poor health so they have to spend even more billions on inadequate healthcare.

So which is it? Are they trying to kill us, or keep us alive but sick?

reply to post by Blue Shift


Certainly if they're trying to kill us off, they're not doing a very good job. Conspiracy exponents keep banging on about how chemtrails (LOL don't get me started on that one!) are poisoning the air, and fluoride is poisoning our water, and GM or heavy metals are poisoning our food, and yet life expectancy just keeps on going up and up and up.

The things that are killing people, at least in the developed world, are generally obesity related. And that is nothing sinister, just an abundance of food and a lifestyle that no longer requires much, if any, exercise. Seriously, lots of people don't even see the outside world at all - they go into their garage, drive to an underground car park at work, get in the lift, sit at their desk all day and then drive home again!

It's not like anyone is forcing anybody to eat processed, fatty, sugary foods. If you care about what you eat, buy fresh produce from farmers' markets or farm shops where you know where it comes from. Grow some veg in your garden. It's not rocket science.