It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by lostbook
Global Warming is a crock of hooey and we're fast building opposing cold records across multiple years, in different places to stack beside those warm records coupled to a cyclical drought, the historic record clearly shows (the early 1930's being one and 50's being another for past periods). Bad timing all around.
I'll agree entirely with climate change, indeed. Which direction..or as I'm increasingly wondering, whether it settles in EITHER direction is an open question to me. I actually HOPE we warm, to be straight. Warmth and Co2 is a self correcting error as warmth breeds plant life, plant life literally breathes Co2 as we breathe oxygen and produces oxygen in return. Part of the whole reason we have Co2 on the radar at all (and there are much worse gasses than that plant food) is that humans have been clearing and burning forest for a couple hundred years like trees are bad weeds or something, and turning lush land into desert and grassland. Neither of which make for a working balance when it's on such a LARGE scale.
The problem tho is.... Warmer we can deal with and does clean it's own oven, so to speak ....Colder we just flat out die from direct exposure too, eventually going down that scale...and so does everything else for that matter. ..Or perhaps worst for the human species? Do we just accept we're moving into a very active or overactive period for violence of storms and weather action? man made or not ....time delay is a very real thing and means if it IS heavily contributed by man, and we stopped everything 100% today? It'd still be a decade or two before real differences were seen on a global scale.
The future won't be boring, is the only certainty I think.
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by lostbook
Indeed, I've heard the "It's cooler because it's really warmer" argument and I simply don't buy it. I know that comes as a shock to simply outright say with some folks and I've almost laughed aloud at one reaction in-person but caught myself before being rude.
xuenchen
reply to post by lostbook
How much does CO2 needs to be reduced today to get the climate back to normal?
What is considered a "safe" level?
How much CO2 is in the atmosphere now?
rickymouse
xuenchen
reply to post by lostbook
How much does CO2 needs to be reduced today to get the climate back to normal?
What is considered a "safe" level?
How much CO2 is in the atmosphere now?
If we took action now, we wouldn't see it back to normal for twenty five years. If we do nothing, we can expect it to start compounding. An ice age can stop this, it has done it before. The correction of the earth to this is to form an ice age.
It should have never been called global warming. It got my hopes up. Climate change is what it should have been called in the first place. It is real, but it seems that the governments want to promote capitalism, not fix the problem. So nobody is going to fix this, we will be throwing a bunch of money at it though, to repair what is going to get destroyed.
With no end in sight, the winter of 2014 rages on, ushering in frigid Arctic air and dumping record-breaking snow and ice on much of the nation. This season, ice coverage on Lake Superior has exceeded other measurements in recent history.
"By the long shot this is the most ice we've had on Lake Superior in 20 years," Associate Professor Jay Austin of the Large Lakes Observatory in Duluth, Minn., said.
During a typical winter, 30 to 40 percent of the Great Lakes are covered by ice, according to AccuWeather Senior Meteorologist Brett Anderson.
Source
Usually Arctic air swept over the Great Lakes creates lake-effect snow, but modifies the air, making it warmer. This usually makes regions from Ohio through the Northeast a little warmer than it otherwise would be.
However, this winter 80 to 90 percent of the Great Lakes are covered in ice. As of Thursday, Feb. 13, 2014, Lake Superior was classified as 90 percent covered.
Bilk22
reply to post by lostbook
I thought the climate always changed. Is that news?
Wrabbit2000
reply to post by lostbook
Indeed, I've heard the "It's cooler because it's really warmer" argument and I simply don't buy it. I know that comes as a shock to simply outright say with some folks and I've almost laughed aloud at one reaction in-person but caught myself before being rude.