It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Learning that all three of the Newtown Selectmen, including Patricia Llodra, had received homes for $0 dollars may shed light on the whole bizarre Sandy Hook experience, where in retrospect it looks as though Llordra’s expression of appreciation to the main stream media for their “respectful professionalism” in covering the observance was really an expression of appreciation for covering up what had actually happened.
reply to post by Sremmos80
It wouldn't be hard to do. The teachers come in to clean the room, and "straighten things up". The first thing that has to be cleaned is the blood. It may not even have been something that the school chose to do, but something the teachers decided to do on their own. Or someone else chose to do to help.
It's entirely possible that the school made the choice to do it themselves as well. But saying that it's "unheard of" for a cleanup to happen without a registered company doing it is disingenuous. Whether it was the pizza place I worked at, or somewhere else, it does happen. It's not legal, but when has that stopped someone when they thought they could save a few bucks.
I wasn't involved in the cleanup, but some of the workers there when I was were involved, and I talked to some of the people that were. From what I was told everything was bagged up and tossed in the dumpster out back.edit on 2/19/2014 by Zaphod58 because: (no reason given)
Why is this in the Ludicrous Online Lies? The whole point of this forum is to deny ignorance. We can't even discuss a topic that has a lot of interest based on the flags and stars. There are a lot of questions that simply haven't been answered.
I really don't comprehend why as site like this is so afraid of this particular topic.
Anyway, I don't pay to be here so they can do what they want, but I still disagree with the site owners on this one particular issue. There are simply too many problems with the official story.
to say that someone with Aspergers is incapable of carrying out this event is ludicrous.
How does he carry all of that and then shoot 26 people, three to 11 times, in 11 minutes? I'm not that good and I'm a good police officer.
no bio-hazard company was contacted to clean blood, bodily fluids. This is impossible.
porta potties were on site; again with no comment by officials and consistent with holding a staged event.
reply to post by therealguyfawkes
Dear readers and members ask yourself what are the odds not a single parent would have filled a lawsuit or wanted to view there kid. This alone is enough to really make you think.
The state enjoys "sovereign immunity" against most lawsuits unless permission to sue is granted.
As Mike Powers, a professional military investigator and ballistics expert, has observed, this young man of slight build could not have carried all these heavy, bulky weapons and ammunition on his person. Furthermore, since first responders were supposedly inside the school within seven minutes, there was not enough time for Lanza to have carried out the shooting as reported. In an interview with Joyce Riley, Powers states that Lanza could not have fired so many times continuously without destabilizing himself from the intense noise from the Bushmaster. As a novice, he could not have shot an AR-15 with such speed and accuracy, supposedly changing magazines 8-10 times without a stoppage.
According to Lt. Vance on the night of the shooting, one victim survived. So in less than seven minutes—or less than five minutes according to the media—Lanza killed 26 people and then himself, producing only one injured victim. This is a 96% kill ratio, which is unheard-of accuracy among the most experienced marksmen. Powers thinks the whole scenario is a physical impossibility. He is not even convinced that Adam Lanza was a real person.
If a fraud, sure there are multiple unanswered questions, but where's the payoff. What's the end game? What was the desired outcome?
With 9/11 we have 2 wars and an increased military industrial complex. Much money was made. Maybe trillions. With Sandy Hook, there is no end game? Tougher gun law legislation was not passed and that appears to be a weak endgame anyway. It wouldn't have been a gun ban just tougher background checks. That's not a bad thing anyway. So I don't see it.
reply to post by Zaphod58
Oh ok, so the teachers went into the FBI controlled crime scene and started cleaning up the blood of the victims. How long after the event do you suppose they were in their respected rooms straightening up?
At least say a school janitor was the one that did it if you are ok just brushing this clean up aspect off to the school doing it.
reply to post by Xcathdra
A judge recently ordered info pertaining to Sandyhook be released, and if I remember right the 911 tapes were part of that release.