It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by Argyll
I quoted Wiki on the definition of the term Habitat, from which adjective Habitable is derived
A habitat is an ecological or environmental area that is inhabited by a particular species of animal, plant, or other type of organism. It is the natural environment in which an organism lives, or the physical environment that surrounds a species population.
Wiki
So, when I say habitable I mean life included.
Just because a planet was or is habitable doesn't mean that it is/was habitated (sp)
IMO if planet was/is habitable it was/is life there.
ABLE to be habitated ... there is no assumption of life with habitable.
It has always been maintained Mars was most likely "habitable" for a brief period billions of years ago. It was likely very brief, and life forming is certainly questionable because of that.
Arken
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
ABLE to be habitated ... there is no assumption of life with habitable.
Tricks with words, eh, magician?
For the Occam Razor (the real Occam Razor Law and not OccamsRazor n.04) this means Mars has supported life.
Oh, and even very intelligent life...
Arken
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
It has always been maintained Mars was most likely "habitable" for a brief period billions of years ago. It was likely very brief, and life forming is certainly questionable because of that.
Please explain, in years, your... "Brief Period"... and how you assume that.
Thx.
So much to explore and so much yet to discover I think.
OccamsRazor04
Arken
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
magician....
My wordsmithing skills are pretty magical
Arken
OccamsRazor04
Arken
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
magician....
My wordsmithing skills are pretty magical
Exactly. Only with words' tricks, but not with logic.
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
NASA previously stated that Mars 'could have been habitable'...
Now they're saying that Mars 'was habitable'...
There is obviously difference in those two statements.
First one is telling about the possibility, the second with certainty.
According to you, there is no difference and these statements are of the same meaning.
After Earth, Mars is the planet with the most hospitable climate in the solar system. So hospitable that it may once have harbored primitive, bacteria-like life. Outflow channels and other geologic features provide ample evidence that billions of years ago liquid water flowed on the surface of Mars. Although liquid water may still exist deep below the surface of Mars, currently the temperature is too low and the atmosphere too thin for liquid water to exist at the surface.
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
If we are looking for 'life as we know it' on Mars, that is similar what's found on Earth...
Whenever I say, here on Earth, that one area is habitable, it means with 100% certainty that there's LIFE there in some form.
We don't look for life as we don't know it!
zilebeliveunknown
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
If we are looking for 'life as we know it' on Mars, that is similar what's found on Earth...
Whenever I say, here on Earth, that one area is habitable, it means with 100% certainty that there's LIFE there in some form.
We don't look for life as we don't know it!