It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
a new investigation aimed at uncovering what really took place during the 2009 global influenza pandemic, which led to tens of millions of people being vaccinated for so-called "swine flu." A joint investigation by the British Medical Journal (BMJ) and the Bureau of Investigative Journalism (BIJ) has already uncovered major conflicts of interest at WHO, whereby vaccine companies profited heavily....
"After Dr [Michael] Elashoff's review (he had access to individual patient data and summary study reports) the FDA's advisory committee voted by 13 to 4 not to approve zanamivir on the grounds that it was no more effective than placebo when the patients were on other drugs such as paracetamol," adds the report. "Dr Elashoff's view was that zanamivir was no better than placebo -- and it had side effects."
And before anyone jumps on the main source, Natural News, claiming it's debunked from that, see more info provide. There is a source article with even more info - See here, to look into.
reply to post by beckybecky
Well how about that, I always felt pushing flu vaccines was really getting to the point where it was causing fear among the public. In all my years, I've never seen local pharmacies posting flu reminder signs and pushing flu shots. Every time I have a doctor's visit during the winter months, my family doctor is always pushing me to get a flu shot. The media is always pushing people to get shots during the winter months.
It could be argued that if there was an actual pandemic, then the measures taken wouldn't have been questioned.
But there wasn't, so now the WHO's credibility is mud.
If they did do all this to line their own pockets, they've just shot themselves in the foot, as now everyone will be wary of their claims.
I think there's more to this story than we are being told.